forgot to bid

according to 23.2.d: A reserve pilot will not be required to remain on call after his accumulated credit equals or exceeds his reserve guarantee.

So first, if the ALV is 75 hours or greater you get 7 SCs. Wanted to mention that.

Second, the way I read that is if you have an ALV of 80 hours and you have accumulated credit equaling 79:59, you can go to ALV+15 which is 95 hours. Like 80 said, you have 4 days left and are ALV - 5 hours, you can be assigned a 20 hour trip and hit near 95 hours. Sure you were full at 80 hours but you didn't equal/exceed 80 before you got your next trip which can exceed 80 up to 95.

Right?

Kind of like the bucket system. At 80 points you are in bucket 1 and at 81 you are in bucket 2. So if you've got 80 points and are starting reserve you're up ahead of a pilot senior to you. Had you flown to 81 points you're in bucket 2 and that pilot senior to you is now ahead of you for any trips. Anyways, the guys who work weekends will get slaughtered.

capncrunch

It's funny that you have to point that out to Sailingfun. We all know perfectly well he knows this but he lives in a world of half truths to make ALPA look better. It just seems like if someone needs to use half truths and fuzzy math to support their point most of the time they'd realize they are arguing against being truthful and they would stop. Nope.

dalad

The actual truth to the reserves number is this. When we went to PBS the intent was to have 10% of the pilots on reserve. We have been over that number ever since it was implemented. I know, I was in those meetings were that was discussed. What is going on now has nothing to do with the latest contract. The company realized that the 10%was unrealistic and has been tweaking ever since. Your beef should be with crew resources, not DALPA.

DeadHead

Is it too early to order my C2015 bag tag and lanyard from DALPA?

Herkflyr

Contrary to many recent posts, I see most reserves are sitting at home getting paid to grow a beard. Most widebody reserves aren't getting close to half the ALV, much less to the ALV. "Yeah but wait till summer" you say. Well, hmmm..., isn't that how things always are in this industry? Summertime flying picks up and pilots fly more? Or did I miss something?

The entire ALV+15, while I admit concessionary, isn't going to be nearly as onerous as you think, due to those pesky things called FARs. There is no way a domestic pilot is going to be flying 95 hours a month except as a statistical outlier--it certainly won't be the norm. Further, the 7 short call thing only takes effect when the new FT/DT rules are in effect, which limits any short call (domestic or international) to 14 hours.

The true reason for ALV+15 was the long 12-14 day trips flying to the Pacific that in the summertime frequently are worth 85+ hours.

Under the old contract if a pilot sicked out of one of those, not one reserve in the entire airline would be eligible to be assigned it, even if he had 15 or more continuous on call days, because you could not be assigned a trip that would cause you to exceed the ALV.

In prior eras, DAL (south) rarely had such trips, but the NWA side always did.

I do not believe it is unreasonable for the company to expect a reserve with zero hours to be assigned a published trip completely over his on call days. Any reserve in a WB category whose line started out with 18 straight on call days (which is common in such categories) should be eligible for such. Apparently the thinking on this forum disagrees.

As for "reserves are going to be slaughtered." I disagree. Reserves flying a bunch over summer?...yes, but isn't that what the airline industry is all about? At least now they have the calendar day average going for them, which applies to reserves and deadhead-only duty periods. While not perfect, now a two-day trip is always worth at least 9 hours to a reserve, where it might have only been worth four before!

Last, despite lots of complaints here, I believe that we would have furloughed long ago except for two things:

RA truly doesn't want to rock the boat with all the strategic moves he has in mind, and I think he has accepted the price of peace by having temporarily surplus pilot staffing.

The contractual provision that mandates the company remove all seats over 70 from every DCI aircraft if mainline so much as furloughs one pilot. Further, this isn't subject to force majeure and is much more effective than a blanket no-furlough clause which we have all seen is about worthless. If management wants the 76 seaters so bad--and apparantly they do--then it will be costly indeed to furlough anyone from the mainline.

NWA320pilot

Not entirely true....... If someone had a yellow slip in then they could be assigned the trip. As a FO on an aircraft that flies ALV+ trips I didn't see crew scheds having a problem assigning these trips. We have too many guys wanting to fly in excess of ALV!

The Cavalier

That's just it. There was never a provision that didn't allow a pilot to go above the ALV if they chose to. Now we force them to.

It's funny because on 3 different occasions in the past 2 years I have either hit ALV or come within 2 hrs of it. On 2 other occasions I've probably come within 3-5 hrs of ALV and the result was more less the same. This was all in a domestic category. So I don't buy this idea that reserves in those categories don't fly enough to see a degradation of QOL. I understand that the summers means working more but now that we've moved the summer months to 30 day periods now we're talking min days off. When you're working every on call day the added extra 2 days that you could look forward to were valuable.

The idea that you have to be ALV+15 to be screwed is flawed. Not being full is bad enough but there will a lot of ALV+5 and ALV+10 going on which is bad enough. Taking OPTIONS away from pilots is never a good thing. Furthermore if ALV+15 is a rule to cover 12-14 day trips, why not make AlV+15 a intl category only reserve rule?

The Cavalier

You know the regional I worked for would use the "it's industry standard" line to justify routinely flying you into your days off.

Funny thing is those FAR's that you say will prevent the company from flying reserves in a domestic category to 90+ hours per month sure didn't prevent the regional I worked for from doing it routinely 4-6 months/year over the course of 7 years of employment with less productive trips. Glad to know the FAR's here are different.

Columbia

Etihad on a growth spree

Etihad buys India's Jet's London slots as deal talks continue - Yahoo! News

acl65pilot

I'm going to jump in on this one.

DALPA is very aware of what the deficit is, what it will take to be in compliance at the end of the measurement period, and what it will take to be in compliance a year later. (End of the Cure period)

The measurement period is three years with Air France/KLM/AZ. The contract does not have any corrective mechanisms in place before the end of the measurement period, and then there is a 12 month cure period after that. That means that even if it does not look like DAL will be in compliance there is no trigger to claim they are in violation of the contract until the end of the cure period. Good or bad, what we see today is a measurement and is not contractually significant. Until there is a true violation of the PWA, any action taken will be dismissed because no violation as yet to occur.

DALPA measures this constantly and is aware of the EASK balance.

*Of note labor laws in France just recently changed and the Q1 2013 pull down by Air France is quite significant. Apparently these changes to French Labor law allow AF more flexibility in their block plan. Again, your union is watching the EASK balance.