Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2013, 05:39 AM
  #123521  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ferd149's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: LAX ERA
Posts: 3,457
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
What are the economics of the 747-400. Something simple that shows max pax and max cargo (actually carried) vs fuel burned for a long haul flight.

Or, vacation pax ATL to MCO.

Where the 777 really shines is low fuel burn, especially late in the trip segment on an ULH.
If this happens, I'll be wrong AGAIN......I figured the days of the 4 engine airliner were done. The logistics train on a 4 engine jet have to be huge. But, if you get them cheep enough up front I can see how it works out.

Plus, the added bonus is T finally gets to fly his Whale.........he won't tell ya but that's what he really wants to do

Last edited by Ferd149; 02-22-2013 at 05:50 AM.
Ferd149 is offline  
Old 02-22-2013, 05:49 AM
  #123522  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
Default

Originally Posted by HBdude
To add to the used 744 discussion - a LCA from my base said he spoke with a Boeing employee in the back while DH'ing about 7-8 months ago, who said it was his job to look for used 744's for Delta. Didn't give it much thought at the time. But it may help add something to the discussion now.
Delta has there own internal used aircraft group. They monitor virtually every airliner for sale world wide. That is how now and then we pick up the odd 757 or 767. If the question is are we looking at xxx aircraft that might be for sale the answer is always yes because they monitor everything that is on the market. If they see something that interests them they will often travel for a inspection even though it rarely leads to a purchase. This often starts rumors when it's mentioned they are traveling to inspect aircraft.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 02-22-2013, 05:55 AM
  #123523  
Looking for a laugh
 
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Delta has there own internal used aircraft group. They monitor virtually every airliner for sale world wide. That is how now and then we pick up the odd 757 or 767. If the question is are we looking at xxx aircraft that might be for sale the answer is always yes because they monitor everything that is on the market. If they see something that interests them they will often travel for a inspection even though it rarely leads to a purchase. This often starts rumors when it's mentioned they are traveling to inspect aircraft.
They didn't such a hot job on the DD for 6818, the AeroMexico 757. That thing is a POS.
Justdoinmyjob is offline  
Old 02-22-2013, 05:57 AM
  #123524  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149
I can't imagine the CASM is as good as a 777. If this happens, I'll be wrong AGAIN......I figured the days of the 4 engine airliner were done. The logistics train on a 4 engine jet have to be huge. But, if you get them cheep enough up front I can see how it works out.

Plus, the added bonus is T finally gets to fly his Whale.........he won't tell ya but that's what he really wants to do
Ferd;

There are trip segments where a greater than 2 engine jet make better sense. For example - in the airway manual, Iran and Afghanistan are "don't land here unless you are on fire" countries. So, on a light twin, you lose a motor and you could be trucking 7-800 miles on the other engine. Rare yes, possible yes. Africa - I don't know if they still use the "for training purposes only" handout, but all those Air France destinations in western africa used to be off limits to us for diverting (theoretically). IMO, economics isn't the only consideration. Application of etops is important too.

Also, the stations where we cube and or gross out on cargo and leave pax behind are potential 747 stations. Can you imagine being able to easily non-rev in and out of argentina? or greece? or turkey? (do we even fly there anymore?

747s are used all over the world. I can't imagine a huge logistics chain requirement for a jet that so many carriers operate.

Economics are a huge consideration, but not the only one.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 02-22-2013, 05:58 AM
  #123525  
Gets Weekends Off
 
vprMatrix's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 243
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
If the company wanted the early retirement package because we are overstaffed, why did they also want the productivity increases that required fewer pilots?

My guess is that they wanted it to smooth out training bumps down the line.

Wait!

I thought we were told the early retirement package was something that was good for us anyway. Now, it comes out that it was something that the company wanted? I think someone pointed that out last year.

Boy. We sure did fall for it (again).
Originally Posted by sailingfun
The 747 if used on a daily 10 hour round trip flight burns in excess of 20 million dollars a year more fuel then the 777 300. The question becomes how much additional revenue can the 747 generate.
What $/gal is your 20 million based on. It would also be helpful to know what kind of fuel lbs difference per 10 hour segment there is between the two.

The 747 can carry an extra 100 pax per 10 hour segment or 200 per day on some of our more expensive tickets. It's possible that it could make up a good bit of the 20 mil difference.
vprMatrix is offline  
Old 02-22-2013, 06:10 AM
  #123526  
Gets Weekends Off
 
nwaf16dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 737A
Posts: 1,890
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The 747 if used on a daily 10 hour round trip flight burns in excess of 20 million dollars a year more fuel then the 777 300. The question becomes how much additional revenue can the 747 generate.

Edit: A forum reader just emailed me and stated the number is closer to 30 million a year at 3.50 a gallon for fuel.
I don't doubt your numbers, but how much does it cost to finance a 300mil airplane vs a 40 mil jet that you might even be able to pay cash for?

I'm clearly no expert, and I'll be very happy to see any new, non-replacement, big jets.
nwaf16dude is offline  
Old 02-22-2013, 06:15 AM
  #123527  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dirtdiver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 767A
Posts: 791
Default

Originally Posted by Wilbur Wright
Correct. The fences come down for the AE after December 31, 2014.

How can we possibly crew these 744s?

All fNWA with the DB plan will be retiring any day!
Dirtdiver is offline  
Old 02-22-2013, 06:16 AM
  #123528  
Sho me da money!
 
FIIGMO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: B25, Left
Posts: 947
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
You know we get knocked around here for rumors, but there is nothing wrong with rumors. I don't think rumors originate out of thin air most of the time but rather we hear them because former line pilots and friends of pilots working on/investigating a project have loose lips. But that doesn't mean the project isn't real. It might not get approved, but it may have been studied all the way down to seeing the plausibility with it in different departments.

So would Delta acquire a bunch of used 747-400s?

1) I hope so.

2) Carl's source said Delta wants 773s. Boeing's price is too high? What is Boeing's current price?
3) Would we really want the 773?
  • RA this past week in Seattle in an interview with the Puget Sound Business Journal made this comment about the 739, could the same thought process apply to 773 as well?
  • Well, it doesn't look like we want the 748:

4) Carl's source says Boeing would not budge. Why would Boeing not want to budge?

5) Carl's source says Boeing has 11 747-400s on the used car lot with low miles and previously owned by non-smokers who only drove them on the highway if ever. Are there used 744s out there?
  • There are 10 744s listed on Boeing.com Boeing.com Used 744 Lot
  • Globalplanesearch.com has (to the best of my counting ability and after removing all of the 744Fs and BCF models) 36 744-400 passenger jets for sale of which 22 are what Delta would refer to as "they are young" jets and are less than 20 years of age. APCF crowd would refer to them as "of legal age".Other 744s for sale.
  • Globalplanesearch.com lists a 93 model for $18M, 92 for $20M, 92 for $26M and 97 for $23M. Other 744s for sale.
  • Planespotters.net lists that there are about 20 744s (as best I can count) stored, not written off, that are under 20 years of age: 744 Stored
  • Who knows where these planes are coming from or from what airline or whether there are customers willing to trade in 744s for those 748s Boeing is desperate to sell. Boeing warns about unclaimed 747-8 production slots

6) Would Boeing really give us barely used 744s for half the price of a 773?
7) Would Delta do it?
  • Richard Anderson 01/22/2013
  • Was there another reason RA was in Seattle this past week and now we get this tidbit from Carl?

So with all of that said and referenced, I ask, DALAD, are you buying or selling what Carl heard?

I am buying and going long.

Standby for input from people who actually know what they're talking about.
Good GAWD man!!!! Where do you get the time for this stuff????
FIIGMO is offline  
Old 02-22-2013, 06:18 AM
  #123529  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ferd149's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: LAX ERA
Posts: 3,457
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
Ferd;

There are trip segments where a greater than 2 engine jet make better sense. For example - in the airway manual, Iran and Afghanistan are "don't land here unless you are on fire" countries. So, on a light twin, you lose a motor and you could be trucking 7-800 miles on the other engine. Rare yes, possible yes. Africa - I don't know if they still use the "for training purposes only" handout, but all those Air France destinations in western africa used to be off limits to us for diverting (theoretically). IMO, economics isn't the only consideration. Application of etops is important too.

Also, the stations where we cube and or gross out on cargo and leave pax behind are potential 747 stations. Can you imagine being able to easily non-rev in and out of argentina? or greece? or turkey? (do we even fly there anymore?

747s are used all over the world. I can't imagine a huge logistics chain requirement for a jet that so many carriers operate.

Economics are a huge consideration, but not the only one.
Yup, agree with everything you say.

I remember RA talking about them years ago at NWA. He said something to the effect that back in the day you had to have a big airplane to fly big distances. Now not so much (I think the discussion was 747 vs 777 vs 330 to Asia).

I wish they would do more with the Whale to places like you mention. I hung out on the 757 for an additional 5 to 8 years waiting for the Whale. By the time I could hold it (with a line) it only did crossings and MNL....boring

I REALLY hope we get them.

Ferd
Ferd149 is offline  
Old 02-22-2013, 06:20 AM
  #123530  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
Default

Originally Posted by vprMatrix
What $/gal is your 20 million based on. It would also be helpful to know what kind of fuel lbs difference per 10 hour segment there is between the two.

The 747 can carry an extra 100 pax per 10 hour segment or 200 per day on some of our more expensive tickets. It's possible that it could make up a good bit of the 20 mil difference.
I stated that you have to look at how much more revenue the 747 can generate. Based on 80,000lbs per leg more fuel burn the cost is almost 30 million at 3.50 a gallon. Again the revenue generation is the question. The 747 can carry a lot more in the middle stage lenghts however in the ULH operations that margin goes away.
The other consideration is the difference in maintenance costs between a 4 engine 10 to 20 year old jet and a brand new 2 engine jet. They are substantial. There is a reason that 747 400 are being scraped. Here is article from last June. Note that the newest 400's at 10 years old were selling for 36 million in June and many are being broken up for scrap.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-0...ear-reign.html
sailingfun is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices