Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-18-2013, 05:27 AM
  #123211  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RunFast's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Working 5 to 9
Posts: 518
Default

What does "Use PF Keys" mean when trying to swap with pot?
RunFast is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 05:42 AM
  #123212  
Gets Weekends Off
 
volav8r1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: The New Delta
Posts: 115
Default

Originally Posted by RunFast
What does "Use PF Keys" mean when trying to swap with pot?
At the bottom of the screen click the Save button. It's labled "PF12" I think.
volav8r1 is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 05:47 AM
  #123213  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: Decoupled
Posts: 922
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Click here <-------------
Thanks. Those are nice financial calculators.
orvil is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 06:17 AM
  #123214  
You scratched my anchor
 
Al Czervik's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,910
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Just as the B Scale guys fought and won, we who have suffered with outsourcing will have our day. We are not irrelevant we are just early. When Delta starts hiring legions of former RJ pilots the politics will change rapidly.
Good post. The regional guys will never forget the lessons learned.
Al Czervik is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 07:13 AM
  #123215  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by Flamer
8/4/3/3 comes to mind.
yep. 4/8/3/3.

and let's not forget to factor in the loss of a piece of the profit sharing pie.
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 07:26 AM
  #123216  
Gets Weekends Off
 
crewdawg52's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Right Seat 744
Posts: 946
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Hancho
When PCS for MAR opens this week does the first run go in seniority order or first in que?
I believe its white slips, swap w/ pot, yellow slips in order, seniority.
crewdawg52 is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 07:40 AM
  #123217  
Sho me da money!
 
FIIGMO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: B25, Left
Posts: 947
Default Curious Ques.

I am not a finance guy by any means, after all I went to state college and we know that is like going to high school twice!! But looking back at our relatively short history since BK, (not a TA debate at all) DAL pilots had a leg up on other legacies as far as pay and we did see progressive gains even before we signed the last TA. My question is, (when looking at current financials and assuming some static market conditions and economic principles) how will the financials look at AA and UAL when those new pilot costs kick in over the next few years? End term contracts do have some significant raises for those pilots, some as high as 40%. Given the fact that 2012 year end had us all very similar in terms of over all profit, the fact that UAL and AA have some pretty big making up to do compared to DAL (because of post BK and current TA pay raises) would it would be safe to say UAL and AA will be squeezed much harder than DAL as far as pilot costs?.......

Just askin!
FIIGMO is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 07:45 AM
  #123218  
Sho me da money!
 
FIIGMO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: B25, Left
Posts: 947
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Look's like the rumored squabble with AS may have some credence. LAX-SEA is going to 1x 757, 1x 738, and 1xCR9... and MEM-SEA is returning for the summer with 1x A320.
Quit teasing everyone 80!!! Please share the source I would love to book a Jump Seat while commuting! Or am I not reading the required memos?

Fiig
FIIGMO is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 07:50 AM
  #123219  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,014
Default

Originally Posted by FIIGMO
I am not a finance guy by any means, after all I went to state college and we know that is like going to high school twice!! But looking back at our relatively short history since BK, (not a TA debate at all) DAL pilots had a leg up on other legacies as far as pay and we did see progressive gains even before we signed the last TA. My question is, (when looking at current financials and assuming some static market conditions and economic principles) how will the financials look at AA and UAL when those new pilot costs kick in over the next few years? End term contracts do have some significant raises for those pilots, some as high as 40%. Given the fact that 2012 year end had us all very similar in terms of over all profit, the fact that UAL and AA have some pretty big making up to do compared to DAL (because of post BK and current TA pay raises) would it would be safe to say UAL and AA will be squeezed much harder than DAL as far as pilot costs?.......

Just askin!
I've not modelled it, but US Air (ie America West) always outperformed my expectations. When excavating through their financials, the real reason they did well was their well below labor costs. I believe with the merger, they will lose their America West style labor model. It should help Delta in comparison, just the same way that AirTran / ValuJet being absorbed by higher cost Southwest helps level the playing field.

Also, in comparison, we have a better network. We should be able to continue a revenue premium and hopefully add to it.

For the first time in a long time it appears management is far enough out in front of our immediate problems to focus on longer term strategy.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 08:04 AM
  #123220  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,014
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
I have come to the conclusion that the only way these deals will work out is if the penalty for non-compliance is spelled out ahead of time.

A good example is pulling 6 seats out of the RJs is the company does XXXXX. It is spelled out in black and white and the company knows what will trigger it and they have avoided triggering it.

Saying that we will play ball (whatever the issue is) now and in the future the company will do XXXXX seems to be a big failure. Because the company eventually may not do XXXX and we are left to ponder the consequences on a Web board.

Now this issue is a lot more complicated than this - for instance a lot of what the company does, they can do without DALPA's blessing even though they would like to have the Pilots on-board. I get that - All I am asking for is that when we come to the agreements spell out the terms and consequences of non-compliance ahead of time.

I have said DALPA does not have a great track record on this issue but at times they have fought hard and won - fighting the Force-Majeure and winning the no furlough clause fight after the Gulf War comes to mind. At other times they have been very unimpressive - Scope related issues comes to mind here.

Scoop
Scoop,

Yours is a solid idea. But, you have to look at history. Have we enforced scope, or traded it?

Trading one pilot's job to benefit other pilots is an ugly business for a union to be in, so it is not something done in the light of day. But, when I have brought forward multiple violations of our scope the ONLY actionable response I've EVER received is, "what kind of bargaining leverage does that give us?"

Now when faced with a Constitutional issue on scope (who bargains with Delta management) the Delta MEC prefers to redefine the terms to avoid a conflict over what is "Delta flying."

IMHO, we Delta pilots have great jobs. In large part we are happy with our Company and to some extent by extension, our representation. We are peace loving pacifists and we are represented as such. Until the politics change to the extent that the majority of pilots are willing to recall those who don't desire a fight ... we are wasting our time even thinking about putting non compliance penalties in the contract. (IMHO, our Reps might be right, if they fought and lost they might be unpopular and popularity is the basis for election ... that's just reality)

While few politicians would say they desire non compliance, almost all are willing to trade in it.

I have suggested a requirement that the Company be forced to staff for our share of flying, regardless of whether we do it. If that model is accepted, it would give us the benefit of scope compliance without as great a potential for extended non compliance and the trading that typically resolves the so called problem of noncompliance.

P.S. I still wonder if Contract 2000 was written with expected non compliance. The RJ triggers were exceeded on management's schedule, even though the aircraft orders were negotiated BEFORE C2K negotiations were complete.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices