Originally Posted by johnso29

When did I ever defend the 9E Bridge Agreement?

Originally Posted by SailorJerry

Don't make that face at me. My sarcasm eludes me on my iPhone after 2 margaritas.

Originally Posted by SailorJerry

By the time we even get to the full brunt of the work rules we'll be back into preliminary bargaining. The company will have had plenty of time to watch their world class operation disintegrate in front of them if they've pushed too far. What was the line at the end of Boondock Saints?

The question is not how far.

The question is:

Do you posses the constitution? The depth of faith...

...to go as far as is needed?

Originally Posted by johnso29

I came from a regional. I'll take our current work rules over that anyday.

Originally Posted by johnso29

I came from a regional. I'll take our current work rules over that anyday.

Originally Posted by Jack Bauer

A lot of guys feel powerless, have zero confidence their union will fix anything and yet soldier on hoping for a better alternative to come along. On time/completion performance may or may not suffer.

Then as you say, we are right back in contract negotiations again. The company will say they are on the verge of ordering some wide bodies (RA spotted in Toulouse)...the only way they can pull it off economically is trading in more 50's for some mainlines sized RJ's (outsourced to the regionals). ALPA sells the HE11 out of hit and here we go again.....wash, rinse, repeat. The career we call airline pilot stagnates another decade (preventing some from ever upgrading) unless we change our bargaining agent. Forget the idea of changing the fortress we call ALPA. Most have given up hope on that as ALPA continues to flaunt their power and become even more impervious to change.

Guys already in the left seat have less heartburn (except for Carl ) and just go for the cash. Can't really blame them....it's human nature. Anyone who is an FO that buys off on the fervent sales pitch continues to shoot him/herself in the foot. This will become even more apparent as the full extent of the fire sale we just had kicks in. I have to laugh every time I read the weekly updates with not one word of hiring (like it's a dirty word now). Quite a switch from what we were hearing leading up to C2012. And please don't tell me its due to the economy changing (it has actually gotten better) or more military guys coming back than planned. As someone said earlier those stats just don't add up.

Originally Posted by capncrunch

If we keep up these concessionary contracts you'll have the same as you did before.

Originally Posted by Jack Bauer

Why move back closer to that then? Hold the line.

Originally Posted by capncrunch

If we keep up these concessionary contracts you'll have the same as you did before.

Originally Posted by johnso29

I don't think we moved backwards. IMO the ALV+15 issue is being blown way out of proportion. But as I've said before, only time will tell.

Originally Posted by sailingfun

Delta is like a elephant. They never forget so yes they hold long grudges. The A321 rumors are just that. The company has stated they want 30 to 40 more narrow body aircraft to augment the order for the 900's. That could be more 900's or A321's. One way or another you are going to hear about both aircraft as they are played against each other. No real new news here. What is new however is the discussion of some bridge widebody aircraft. The company originally said they were happy with the WB fleet and they would place a WB order for aircraft this year however it would be for mostly replacement aircraft after 2017. They are now hinting at a bridge order for 10 to 15 widebodies for near term delivery that would be growth aircraft. They are talking 777 or A330. I suspect whoever offers the best deal will get the contract for both orders. The A330 has had a recent gross weight increase which makes it a more attractive to Delta then in the past.
Going against Alaska in SEA I suspect is not going to happen. We don't have any gate space on LAX or SEA. If they add some more international in SEA then gates will be really tight. The same applies in LAX and contrary to what has been posted here Alaska is not using are gates in LA. They swapped the gates they had in LA to move over to terminal 6 to co locate with Delta but the additional gates gained in 6 belong to them. We can put some pressure on them with bigger aircraft but any route we go head to head on with them becomes a large money loser for both sides. Alaska has deep pockets and a long battle could happen. I think RA will reach a mutual agreement with them instead of going that route.