Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-2013, 05:28 AM
  #122631  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Sailing, according to the welcome to SWA packet, they say they:
  • fly an average of 10.78 hours per day per jet. Using that figure x 365.2425 days and you get 3,937 hours per SWA jet per year.
  • they have 5,813 line pilots*.

Last year we found out we flew around 1.9M domestic block hours and when divided by a fleet of 566 domestic jets you come up with a number of about 3,428 hours per domestic DAL jet per year. Those numbers are close to industry standards so I'll run with them.

So using their data from the AirTran welcome packet:
  • SWA: 3,937 hours x 549 jets / 5813 line pilots = 372.85 hours per pilot per year.
  • DAL: 3,428 hours x 182 MD88/MD90s** / 1735 line pilots = 359.59 hours per pilot per year.
So a little less... unless you take into account they are talking about reducing the staffing. Say, a 3.3% reduction or 58.38 pilots system wide? Then we equal SWA.
Except that I don't know too many MD88/MD90 As and Bs making $240,000 and $140,000 with an average of 18 days off a month.

So are we getting close to SWA productivity? I don't know, looks like they fly their jets a little more and the individual pilot flies more hours in less days than we do but they get more days off. So, yes from a company standpoint but no from a pilot standpoint. Now lets assume for a moment all of this is right, what now? What does it mean? It means, we get what we negotiate and approve or allow.

*5813 pilots plus 10% is around 6458, so it looks like 10% is the average for offline pilots as well.
**Based on 65 MD90s
You are lumping our domestic 757/767 fleet into your numbers and applying it to the Md88. Our Md88 utilization rate is very low at the moment. That's not valid. The average daily numbers comparing like sized small narrow bodies I posted.
In the end however the only valid way to compare pilot productivity is block hours per pilot. SW enjoys a huge advantage in that department.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 02-13-2013, 05:32 AM
  #122632  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by Columbia
But....Dalpa said SWA pay by 2015. Will the work rules then change? If not, then why would they make an apples to oranges comparison, I.e. Pay check does not mean pay rates?
I initially said the SWA contract, not pay.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 02-13-2013, 05:33 AM
  #122633  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Maybe the reason (per the SWA welcome packet) SWA runs a 5.3 crew per jet and we run 4.8 per jet is... they have to give their guys more days off then we get?








.

Last edited by forgot to bid; 02-13-2013 at 06:00 AM.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 02-13-2013, 05:37 AM
  #122634  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Maybe the reason (per the SWA welcome packet) SWA runs a 5.3 crew per jet and we run 4.8 per jet is... they have to give their guys more days off then we get?
Then why would we run more crews on our 737s? We have yet to staff our upcoming 737 deliveries.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 02-13-2013, 05:40 AM
  #122635  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
You are lumping our domestic 757/767 fleet into your numbers and applying it to the Md88. Our Md88 utilization rate is very low at the moment. That's not valid. The average daily numbers comparing like sized small narrow bodies I posted.
In the end however the only valid way to compare pilot productivity is block hours per pilot. SW enjoys a huge advantage in that department.
Couple of things, it's hard to do a comparison of like sized narrow bodies between a fleet that consists mostly of 737-700 sized airplanes paying the same as our 747s and a fleet of MD88s and 90s that are larger who pay less. I agree.

Did you see the numbers I posted? It's based off of the numbers SWA posted.

As to 88 utilization, at the moment (February) or for the year? I remember hearing over 50% of the departures in ATL last summer were to be MD88s. When one of ours breaks in ATL is seems as if it's hard to find another.

We've heard the 757s in Asia are inefficient, but they're lumped into the domestic BH number (the one used for the DCI ratio). Some of the 757s are old too are they not? Are they being used to their max?

And the 753s seem to fly a lot from ATL-MCO, that's not a long flight. Some of those 737s and 757s are running common 88 rotations as well.

So unless you have annual MD88 hours, I'm going to use the average.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 02-13-2013, 05:50 AM
  #122636  
Gets Weekends Off
 
nwaf16dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 737A
Posts: 1,890
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
That was then, this is now, and RA2 doesn't seem to live by that rule, quite the opposite, seems he's never walked away from a yard sale empty handed...
He's like the guy that shows up at your yard sale and offers you a quarter for that old stereo you have marked at $50.
nwaf16dude is offline  
Old 02-13-2013, 05:50 AM
  #122637  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Couple of things, it's hard to do a comparison of like sized narrow bodies between a fleet that consists mostly of 737-700 sized airplanes paying the same as our 747s and a fleet of MD88s and 90s that are larger who pay less. I agree.

Did you see the numbers I posted? It's based off of the numbers SWA posted.

So unless you have annual MD88 hours, I'm going to use the average.

In other words, you're going to continue to make stuff up.
slowplay is offline  
Old 02-13-2013, 05:57 AM
  #122638  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Then why would we run more crews on our 737s?
Or cover training as new jets come in.

Speaking of that, we were promised 7 crews per 717, yet, 7 crews per crew planning is overstaffed?
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 02-13-2013, 05:58 AM
  #122639  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
In other words, you're going to continue to make stuff up.
No, I don't work for DALPA.

I'm just going to use the numbers we have available and do some rather simple math.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 02-13-2013, 06:00 AM
  #122640  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Or cover training as new jets come in.

Speaking of that, we were promised 7 crews per 717, yet, 7 crews per crew planning is overstaffed?
I'm not following. Coffee hasn't kicked in yet. What fleet is overstaffed at 7 crews per plane?
johnso29 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices