Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-2013, 01:32 AM
  #122611  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Big ones
Posts: 784
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
I found out a long time ago that if you step up and actually do something to improve pilots' lives, rather than just writing about it on a webboard, that you will subject yourself to this type of personal attack. I am so used to it by now that it just rolls off me like water on the windshield.

If you ever decide to get off your butt and actually do something, then you will find out that solutions are never as easy as they seem. It is ironic that the same people that go ballistic on this forum over the "FLY" button on the Delta safety video, then act as if there is a "GET MORE" button at the union office, and the only thing we need to do is push that button and money will flow like the Mississippi in April.

If it were that easy then someone at American, or United, or Continental, or Southwest, or US Airways would have pressed that button a long time ago. Remember American took 6 years and they never found that button, Airtran 7 years, United 3 years, Continental 4 years. Why oh why did they not push that button? Is it just that Carl, and TOGA, and Purple knew where the button was and didn't tell them, or is it because that button does not exist.

I think you can tell that the button does not exist. There is only one thing. Work. Grinding, difficult, stressful work. Of course you don't know that because you have never done it, instead you choose to denigrate those that work on your behalf. But hey, we have a free country so you can say what you want. I just ask all the readers to decide which theory is more plausible; is there some magic button to push or is there just a series of extremely difficult problems to solve and solving them is neither easy nor free of problems. You decide.

The fact is that our deal was the trigger that broke the entire industry out of the bankruptcy era. United followed us. American is directly hanging onto our coattails. US Airways is just along for the ride with American. Without our deal, we are stuck for years and years in stasis.

So launch away with your attacks it makes no difference to me. I know what I did, I know what our team accomplished, I know what it meant to the industry. Almost every negotiator, professional and pilot alike, has expressed their gratitude to the Delta MEC for breaking out of the logjam. I value their opinions over the webboard guys any day.

So I am now much happier that I have peeled off those layers of responsibility layers that affected me both at work and at home for too many years. I feel no remorse because I gave my time, now it is someone else's turn. In the most difficult times I always relied on this quote from Winston Churchill:

"It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself for a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat."

So I have stumbled, I have fallen short, I have dared and lost, I admit to all those failings. But I was there, fighting the best fight I could and others were sitting on the sidelines carping and crying and complaining. If that makes you feel superior then go ahead. I don't see it that way. I have a camaraderie with those guys that I fought with that will last my lifetime. Those are just as important to me as the monetary gains that we achieved. I only wish for you that you can get off this mountain of bitterness that you have built for yourself and get involved in some positive action to better the lives of those around you. You seem to be a particularly unhappy and bitter person. Your attacks mean nothing to me as you aren't in the arena, you aren't fighting the fight, you are just a brick thrower.

I hope that didn't bamboozle you.
Well said.

(PS you might be quoting Pres Roosevelt but that's really beside the point. Thank you for laboring for so many strangers.)
tripled is offline  
Old 02-13-2013, 01:56 AM
  #122612  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by tripled
Well said.

(PS you might be quoting Pres Roosevelt but that's really beside the point. Thank you for laboring for so many strangers.)
Couldn't his diatribe also be considered long winded internet bloviation as so eloquently previously described by himself?

It's at the least long winded, and there is some serious self love in there!
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 02-13-2013, 02:09 AM
  #122613  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CheapTrick's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: A350
Posts: 629
Default

Is self love wrong? If it is, I don't want to be right.
CheapTrick is offline  
Old 02-13-2013, 02:18 AM
  #122614  
Gets Weekends Off
 
whitt767's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: 7ERB
Posts: 142
Default

Just saw Profit Sharing Check in the bank. Great, but Obama took 25% for Income tax, 6% Soc Sec, 2% Medicare, and ALPA took 2%....Guess what? That equals 35%.... Back to the coal mine.
whitt767 is offline  
Old 02-13-2013, 03:02 AM
  #122615  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,612
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Here's the thing, the 320/73N/89/DC9 will with the 90s be averaging 5.7 crews per jet. Close to Southwest and it should move further down on this next AE.
The only measure of productivity between pilot groups is block hours flown per pilot. Aircraft usage goes up and down with the economy, marketing and type of operation. Usage varies quite a bit at Delta even among narrow body fleets. At the moment as a example we have a surplus of MD88/90 airframes and could fly them more if marketing decides the economy is improving by adding pilots. We needed as many as 35 pilots for each 777 but that is because of high daily hours flown and the need for 3 and 4 man crews.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 02-13-2013, 03:11 AM
  #122616  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,612
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
But on the 88/90, which flies a near identical mission to SWAs 737 fleet, we are running about 4.9-4.8 crews vs SWAs 5.6 crews.

And that's set to go lower if as they said in the crew planning newsletter they reduce staffing further on that jet even with more 90s coming.

But if we went up to SWAs 5.6, we could soon add almost 370 pilots alone just for the 88.
Our 88/90 fleet is being way underutilized so your numbers don't have any meaning. The number used to measure productivity that is valid is block hours flown per pilot.
2011 numbers
SWA 62.1
DAL 42.9

Those numbers are being skewed some because Delta was carrying a greater surplus of pilots then SWA however we are no where near their level of productivity. 2012 numbers are not out yet.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 02-13-2013, 03:18 AM
  #122617  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,612
Default

Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
Johnson conveniently ignores the higher pilot requirements of Delta's international flying. Why does it seem like the data is always so skewed with some of these guys? Thanks for pointing out an actual apples to apples metric unlike Johnson.
The apples to apples measurement is block hours flown per pilot. Unless you know the average daily usage of each fleet comparing hulls to pilots is meaningless. The comparison posted also uses the total number of SW pilots including management, training, mil leave, personal leave, long term sick verses the exact manning numbers at Delta on the 88/90 excluding the above pilots. To get a actual comparison you have to add all those pilots back into the Delta numbers.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 02-13-2013, 03:22 AM
  #122618  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Imapilot2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Captain Jack
Posts: 1,003
Default

Originally Posted by whitt767
Just saw Profit Sharing Check in the bank. Great, but Obama took 25% for Income tax, 6% Soc Sec, 2% Medicare, and ALPA took 2%....Guess what? That equals 35%.... Back to the coal mine.
How else will us working people pay for Obamacare if not highly taxed? As I said last year, wait until this country sees welfare recipients triple with the new 29 hour requirement over 40. Its coming my friend and the damn working man beware.
Imapilot2 is offline  
Old 02-13-2013, 03:23 AM
  #122619  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,612
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Here's the thing, the 320/73N/89/DC9 will with the 90s be averaging 5.7 crews per jet. Close to Southwest and it should move further down on this next AE.
I know your a smart guy from your posts so I can only conclude your are trying to mislead readers with your post. You are fully aware your using the total number of SW pilots verses a snapshot of one fleet at Delta that excludes a large number of pilots your including at SW. This includes management pilots, personal leave pilots, mil leave pilots, long term sick pilots, training pilots ect....
sailingfun is offline  
Old 02-13-2013, 03:43 AM
  #122620  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flamer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Lowest Pay I Could Find
Posts: 1,044
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
You mean the C2012 contract comparison that was completely plagiarized by SWAPA in their own contract preps?

Or that SWAPA memo that said DAL was going to pass them in contract value?

Intentionally misleading and covering up the truths...please.
It was intentionally misleading. It used small nuggets of data broken out in individual sections to portray the TA favorably to other contracts. To say our vacation, for example, is even in the same ball park as SWA or FDX is just not true. Then, the overall wrap up for compensation was absent as well. I'll repost the AirTran welcome packet link. Every SWA pilot here has stated that this is truth data. So if you are so proud of the transparent presentation of the data in the 2012 contract comparison, why is there such a disparity? Try not to take this personally, I just wish people didn't have to do their own research because our union was providing FULL truth data. Scambo makes 30% less flying the 777 than his peer SWA buddy. That is a fact. It would be nice if ALPA would at least acknowledge that. They lose credibility, at least with me, when they don't. I am not as upset about making less than I am about being told that I actually am.

http://library.constantcontact.com/d...me-Booklet.pdf
Flamer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices