Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-2013, 06:16 PM
  #122591  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
That's a very interesting take.

But what is your view on why our own union would go to such galactic lengths to show heavily skewed data for the sole purpose of making management's case that we should only expect minimal gains? What union would do that? I totally get why management would do it, but why our own union? We had absolutely no advocate on our side of the table. We had note takers that simply communicated to us what management was willing to do...and not do.

Carl
Minimal gains.
Carl's pay rate premerger 178 per hour.
Carl's payrate on 1 Jan 14. 262 per hour plus 39 per hour DC.
Total new rate 301 per hour.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 02-12-2013, 06:20 PM
  #122592  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Where was the JFK-GEO cancellation published? Can't say I'll miss that 1230am departure. Especially after sitting SC for 15 hours before reporting for the flight.
You may not miss it, and I may not miss it, but the category will miss it when block hours are calculated, and AE's and Displacements are effected.

I can't believe there isn't enough revenue in there to run something equal to or smaller than Carribean, for example a 737-700, on the route that evidently supported a 757 profitably.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 02-12-2013, 06:22 PM
  #122593  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

So I see more people griping about how we get smoked in earnings by SWA. So let's talk about that.

According to the SWA profile on APC, Southwest has roughly 570 airplanes and 6400 pilots. So they run around 11 pilots(NOT crews) per airplane. DAL has roughly 720 planes and 11,800 pilots. That works out to roughly 16 pilots per airplane.

So, we can already see that the DAL pilot contract creates MORE jobs(Keep in mind our augmentation requirements are contactual) then the SWA pilot contract. HOWEVER, some people on here complain non stop about poor pay and stagnation. So what do you think will happen if DAL pilots successfully obtain a contract which essentially is identical to the SWA pilot contract? Just sit back and think, because if you think we're experiencing stagnation now you can expect even more for SWA pilot contract.

Last edited by johnso29; 02-12-2013 at 07:03 PM.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 02-12-2013, 06:25 PM
  #122594  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flyallnite's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Stay THIRSTY, my friends!
Posts: 1,898
Default

Originally Posted by cni187
So if nothing great and stupendous materializes before the end of 2015, you think DALPA will try and sell us another subpar contract? Hopefully this group(Dal Pilots) will be a lot more critical next time.

There will be a perceived need by the pilot group to "give more at the office", and it will be sold to us. My guess is widebody orders tied to further outsourcing and sub par pay increases.
flyallnite is offline  
Old 02-12-2013, 06:26 PM
  #122595  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
You may not miss it, and I may not miss it, but the category will miss it when block hours are calculated, and AE's and Displacements are effected.
That's true. Eventually I'll be shoved off the 7ER.

Originally Posted by Sink r8
I can't believe there isn't enough revenue in there to run something equal to or smaller than Carribean, for example a 737-700, on the route that evidently supported a 757 profitably.
My guess is they've decided it's "better" to send our passengers on GOL.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 02-12-2013, 06:34 PM
  #122596  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Position: C560XL/XLS/XLS+
Posts: 1,278
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
You may not miss it, and I may not miss it, but the category will miss it when block hours are calculated, and AE's and Displacements are effected.

I can't believe there isn't enough revenue in there to run something equal to or smaller than Carribean, for example a 737-700, on the route that evidently supported a 757 profitably.
The Guyanese government apparently designated Carribean Airlines as their Flag carrier and Suriname Airways announced non stop service to JFK as well out of GEO. EZ jet has already gone out of business with their 767-200 service. Also the Trinidadian government is subsidizing Carribean's fuel. We can't compete and our own government is allowing it to happen.
dalad is offline  
Old 02-12-2013, 06:40 PM
  #122597  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by dalad
The Guyanese government apparently designated Carribean Airlines as their Flag carrier and Suriname Airways announced non stop service to JFK as well out of GEO. EZ jet has already gone out of business with their 767-200 service. Also the Trinidadian government is subsidizing Carribean's fuel. We can't compete and our own government is allowing it to happen.
Wonderful.

I have no idea what the applicable laws are, or whether we have an open skies agreement, or what rights Suriname has to carry people between the two countries, but something sounds wrong. Makes you wonder if the US owed a little something to Guyana, and this was a little offset for SEA-HND. Unfounded, wild speculation on my part, of course, but how does this happen?
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 02-12-2013, 06:45 PM
  #122598  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
So I see more people griping about how we get smoked in earnings by SWA. So let's talk about that.

According to the SWA profile on APC, Southwest has roughly 570 airplanes and 6400 pilots. So they run around 11 pilots(NOT crews) per airplane. DAL has roughly 720 planes and 11,800 pilots. That works out to roughly 16 pilots per airplane.

So, we can already see that the DAL pilot contract creates MORE jobs then the SWA pilot contract. HOWEVER, some people on here complain non stop about poor pay and stagnation. So what do you think will happen if DAL pilots successfully obtain a contract which essentially is identical to the SWA pilot contract? Just sit back and think, because if you think we're experiencing stagnation now you can expect even more for SWA pilot contract.
But on the 88/90, which flies a near identical mission to SWAs 737 fleet, we are running about 4.9-4.8 crews vs SWAs 5.6 crews.

And that's set to go lower if as they said in the crew planning newsletter they reduce staffing further on that jet even with more 90s coming.

But if we went up to SWAs 5.6, we could soon add almost 370 pilots alone just for the 88.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 02-12-2013, 06:56 PM
  #122599  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
But on the 88/90, which flies a near identical mission to SWAs 737 fleet, we are running about 4.9-4.8 crews vs SWAs 5.6 crews.

And that's set to go lower if as they said in the crew planning newsletter they reduce staffing further on that jet even with more 90s coming.

But if we went up to SWAs 5.6, we could soon add almost 370 pilots alone just for the 88.
I'm not sure if the missions are near-identical. They also fly much longer legs than the 88/90 could ever fly. So maybe a mix of 88, 737, A320, and 757 missions. Maybe that mix gets them much higher utilization rates per airplane?
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 02-12-2013, 07:10 PM
  #122600  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jack Bauer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,357
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
But on the 88/90, which flies a near identical mission to SWAs 737 fleet, we are running about 4.9-4.8 crews vs SWAs 5.6 crews.

And that's set to go lower if as they said in the crew planning newsletter they reduce staffing further on that jet even with more 90s coming.

But if we went up to SWAs 5.6, we could soon add almost 370 pilots alone just for the 88.
Johnson conveniently ignores the higher pilot requirements of Delta's international flying. Why does it seem like the data is always so skewed with some of these guys? Thanks for pointing out an actual apples to apples metric unlike Johnson.
Jack Bauer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices