Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-19-2013, 01:08 PM
  #120451  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: 7ERA
Posts: 269
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Well if that's true, that is a huge paradigm shift. While in mediation prior to their strike, they were expressly forbidden by federal mediators for even making a demand for anything with a DL management signature. How and why was that changed, and why is that poisionous practice still being used?
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
To your answer, I do not know and would not presume to agree with the pretense of the question without more information.

Gloopy, and Bar you ever think:

From what I have been told from a different point of view:


The fine print in both of theses agreements is the DAL PWA still supersedes them. I have heard the argument wrt to these agreements, that though it is a direct relationship/agreement with Delta Air Lines, Inc, they are only guaranteeing their part of the "permitted flying" as defined under our PWA and if our PWA changes its at Delta's knowledge and concurrence of these documents they signed. Delta would be dutifully bound to our PWA and its new limits. They signed it. What many say is neither of these direct DCI agreements bind Delta to flying other than what is currently permitted and if that changes their agreements are subject to the change. (Permitted flying changes these agreements change)The end cap statement is it does not change "permitted flying" to "excess bargaining" and ultimately not scopeable by another carrier(this will still hold true with all other permitted flying in Section1 as well), meaning we are free to recapture and define permitted flying it at our desire.

Talk to your reps and get their take on what they know. What I posted above is what I am hearing as the answer to your concerns.
Rogue24 is offline  
Old 01-19-2013, 01:09 PM
  #120452  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

This is a far cry from SD's sales job on possible hiring in 2012 if we signed the TA:

At this point, we don’t expect to begin pilot hiring until 2014. When we do begin hiring, all current Pinnacle pilots who meet Delta’s objective hiring criteria will be eligible to apply for a position at Delta, be considered and interviewed under a streamlined selection process. Like all pilot candidates, the Pinnacle pilots will have to demonstrate standard job knowledge, undergo computer-based screening and participate in Delta’s standard interview panel. The major difference is that this streamlined process will take place in one day rather than the customary two-day timeframe.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 01-19-2013, 01:45 PM
  #120453  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
This post is true if the merger happens without an agreement worked out before hand. If DALPA negotiated a straight staple of 9E beforehand as a condition of merger, and 9EALPA signed off to it, that would be the terms of the merger. Individual 9E pilots would not be able to sue for higher seniority unless they threw ALPA out like at USair, which, is not going to happen with 12,000 vs a small handful of senior Pinnacle pilots.

Edit: I don't think ALPA national cares if there is any upside to any deal. They just want to show other regionals why there is perks to being ALPA IMHO.
Maybe, but I just don't trust the process, the "federal merger law" and the inevitable lawsuit fallout enough to risk putting our seniority numbers on the line for no real gain. Even the "unity" potential here is eliminated as soon as PCL pilots all become DAL pilots because at that point, management still has the same number of RJ's and large RJ's to outsource.

If a prenup was absolutely iron clad and lawsuit proof, and a 100% staple, and the total number of allowable outsourced airframes was decreased in proportion to the number of PCL pilots coming over, then I could see it. But I really doubt that will happen or even be pursued by either party.
gloopy is offline  
Old 01-19-2013, 01:47 PM
  #120454  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,233
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
This is a far cry from SD's sales job on possible hiring in 2012 if we signed the TA:
Sad news.
I also recall the DALPA touch and go (12-06, 23 June 2012) on Delta staffing with and without the TA.

If we are not hiring until January 2014 Delta will shrink by 757 pilots.
Without TA it would have shrunk by 577.

I sure hope I misinterpreted something, can't wait to get corrected
Lifeisgood is offline  
Old 01-19-2013, 01:50 PM
  #120455  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by TOGA LK
But Pinacle already signed off on a contract and LOA stating that their progression would be to the bottom of the list at Delta, how could they expect that to change during a merger? Career earnings and expectations, an RJ pilot doesn't have much of either to claim in an integration especially after they just contracted to be the lowest paid in the industry.

.02
That's a good arguement, but is it strong enough to over come binding arbitration when all the rage is relative integration at least to some degree? DALPA can't risk one single seniority number. Not only that, what is there really to gain by doing this? And how and why is management going to agree? If its done, don't we end up with exactly the same number of allowable outsourced RJ's and large RJ's that can then be flown anywhere?
gloopy is offline  
Old 01-19-2013, 03:09 PM
  #120456  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Maybe, but I just don't trust the process, the "federal merger law" and the inevitable lawsuit fallout enough to risk putting our seniority numbers on the line for no real gain. Even the "unity" potential here is eliminated as soon as PCL pilots all become DAL pilots because at that point, management still has the same number of RJ's and large RJ's to outsource.

If a prenup was absolutely iron clad and lawsuit proof, and a 100% staple, and the total number of allowable outsourced airframes was decreased in proportion to the number of PCL pilots coming over, then I could see it. But I really doubt that will happen or even be pursued by either party.
I think you are putting the cart before the horse though, neither ALPA national or management want us to merge together and recapture small jet scope. This is about getting regional pilots under the ALPA umbrella and making them work for as little as possible. If you ask me, ALPA national is trying to make a power play that its regional partners get exclusive rights to Delta mainline jobs in the future. Imagine if the only way to get a high paying job in this profession is to go through ALPA first, that would be very good for their business. Pinnacle is looking like the pilot project for this.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 01-19-2013, 03:44 PM
  #120457  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NuGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,907
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
I honestly don't know. There is some talk out of national that ALPA will try a single carrier petition because of the way this is structured.
Heyas Bar,

It was my understanding that the GoJets/TSA decision established a precedent that made this an impossibly high bar to hurdle. Surely they know better.

Nu
NuGuy is offline  
Old 01-19-2013, 04:00 PM
  #120458  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flamer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Lowest Pay I Could Find
Posts: 1,044
Default

Originally Posted by Lifeisgood
Sad news.
I also recall the DALPA touch and go (12-06, 23 June 2012) on Delta staffing with and without the TA.

If we are not hiring until January 2014 Delta will shrink by 757 pilots.
Without TA it would have shrunk by 577.

I sure hope I misinterpreted something, can't wait to get corrected
Please don't tell me you fell for the carrot. No surprises here. The group will fall for it again. People should read more quotes from George Santayana.
Flamer is offline  
Old 01-19-2013, 05:06 PM
  #120459  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 403
Talking

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
This is a far cry from SD's sales job on possible hiring in 2012 if we signed the TA:
Yeah, but 80, so many things have changed since he (pretty much) promised hiring!

- The economy has gone downhill drastically. Well, actually, I guess it's kind of more of a flat hill. Like completely level.

- Life in the military has gotten so bad (by not changing at all) that droves of people have started to come off mil leave...hundreds every day. We have so many people coming off mil leave we can't even find planes to put them in! We may have to flow some of them down to Pinnacle!

- We have so many airplanes unexpectedly going into lie-flat mod...we never could have predicted this before the TA. And like the Bermuda Triangle, or Bangkok, once they go in, they never come back out.

Those are just a few of the changes...there could be more!
FlyZ is offline  
Old 01-19-2013, 05:47 PM
  #120460  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: FO
Posts: 3,044
Default

In light of this LOA, I wonder if the Compass guaranteed interview (for non-flow pilots) is an agreement between Compass management and DL or between the MEC and DL. I believe it is an agreement between managements
BlueMoon is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices