Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-2013, 06:15 PM
  #120231  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Generally no.

Folks like me who post a lot (~ 6,700) know that people fact check us, research our posts and hold us accountable.

It seems you ( 42 posts ) come here when ALPA has political problems deliberately post in such a way as to introduce false issues to distract from the malfeasance of your political friends. ( like your bringing up the RJDC when Dan Ford and Ken Cooksey never dreamed of trying to lock the Delta MEC out of the room like Lee Moak just did to the Delta pilots ... we Delta pilots were completely taken for granted ... not even a "how do you do?" )

A man of integrity looks past the politicians to the real issues. We hope ALPA and Delta will both be here long after our brief time on the stage has passed. The more important issues involve the governance of our union so that it remains an ongoing entity.

So, what office do you currently hold on behalf of our association?
This is puzzling Bar. On one hand you're correct in stating that the most serious of our problems is the governance of our union. On the other hand, you seem to believe that the reason it's so important is to ensure ALPA remains an ongoing entity. Whether ALPA remains an ongoing entity is way down on the list of importance. The reason resolving our governance issues is so important is because the lack of governance and adherence to policy is causing the dues paying members to be ill-served. Any "entity" that behaves this way shouldn't be an entity...much less an ongoing one. It only deserves ongoing status if their desire to represent exceeds their desire for self-serving survival.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 01-16-2013, 06:16 PM
  #120232  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,728
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
So if the first PCS run is on the 20th, how is it that reserve requirements for Feb 3rd went from above coverage to below coverage? 27 required 29 available and now its 27-27. How did it go down if the PCS first run hasn't happened?

One person got to drop their February awarded trip before the PCS run, how do you do that? I'd like to be able to do that.
Lots of possible reasons for that; a sudden illness, a scheduled surgery conflict, sudden mil. leave, etc.
Timbo is offline  
Old 01-16-2013, 06:24 PM
  #120233  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

forgot to bid is offline  
Old 01-16-2013, 06:28 PM
  #120234  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,014
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
This is puzzling Bar. On one hand you're correct in stating that the most serious of our problems is the governance of our union. On the other hand, you seem to believe that the reason it's so important is to ensure ALPA remains an ongoing entity. Whether ALPA remains an ongoing entity is way down on the list of importance. The reason resolving our governance issues is so important is because the lack of governance and adherence to policy is causing the dues paying members to be ill-served. Any "entity" that behaves this way shouldn't be an entity...much less an ongoing one. It only deserves ongoing status if their desire to represent exceeds their desire for self-serving survival.

Carl
Carl,

Should we have overthrow the US Government when we have a President who goes off the reservation? Have we? Or, does it make more sense to participate in the next election and help the guy you want get elected?

Besides the fact that I think I'm more of a loyalist than Lee Moak, if ever I were to even breathe a word of support for decertification Hornetsnest, Sailing, Slow and Alpha would have a Section VIII resolution on the agenda for the very next LEC meeting. He he he, maybe I should make such a post just to watch the representational response How fast do you think they could move to Section 8 my keester?

They might just do it anyway on the principle that I'm more trouble than my $2,500 is worth.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 01-16-2013, 06:31 PM
  #120235  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
I do not get your points. You equate Delta pilot labor to any other vendor that Delta management does a contract with. You go further to state that if Delta wants to do mutually exclusive deals with different pilot groups, none of our business.

You also state senior Captains are going to lose their house, while conveniently ignoring the plight of their First Officers who will be the guys really losing their jobs.

I don't care for the political brand of whitewash used to paint over representational malfeasance. Plain and simple, the Pinnacle pilots did not abide by Section 40 of the Admin Manual. Plain and simple, our pilot group got locked out of the room.
I don't care for it either Bar. I care even less for defending the entity that performs the malfeasance as worthy of being ongoing.

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
How can our ALPA be any more irrelevant than to not even participate?
This is exactly what Mr. Moak is trying to show we Delta pilots who threw out his hand-picked MEC Chairman, and elected new reps who ran on returning to a bottom-up representation union. When Mr. Moak signs the Pinnacle agreement, he will be showing these new insolent reps (and the insolent pilots they "represent") that ALPA national decides what will be in your contract...period. The only question is: Will our new reps go to the mat on this, or will they roll over? If they roll over, spending money on a local chapter of ALPA is a total waste of time and money. Because we will be completely irrelevant.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 01-16-2013, 06:39 PM
  #120236  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,014
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
That would have made a splash. Can passengers sue? If so, do they sue Delta? So when they say we couldn't fly as cheaply as the lowest bidder regional airline, does that include lawsuits because of things done outside of their direct control while transporting their passengers?

Maybe, I get what it is about this Pinnacle thing you don't like, you see it as Delta pilots are on the path to just becoming one of many suckling...

To "save money" the subsidiaries were under Delta's risk management (insurance) program. Delta's program got hit for both the Comair and the Colgan losses.

Yes. I think one makes a more satisfying picture than many.

Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 01-16-2013, 06:43 PM
  #120237  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,014
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
When Mr. Moak signs the Pinnacle agreement, he will be showing these new insolent reps (and the insolent pilots they "represent") that ALPA national decides what will be in your contract...period. The only question is: Will our new reps go to the mat on this, or will they roll over? If they roll over, spending money on a local chapter of ALPA is a total waste of time and money. Because we will be completely irrelevant.

Carl
President Moak is one of the most expert political operatives I've ever witnessed. He is the master of the fait accompli.

Our new Reps don't take office until March. There is little they can do to fix an agreement which was ratified today.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 01-16-2013, 06:46 PM
  #120238  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
To "save money" the subsidiaries were under Delta's risk management (insurance) program. Delta's program got hit for both the Comair and the Colgan losses.

Yes. I think one makes a more satisfying picture than many.

That's a small baby and the mothers stomach looks like she is sporting a six pack and while big they don't look swollen. There isn't any flinching. The back is to straight.

I say that is more tease than baby please. I say that is a fake photo.

How about this photo? Can this work?

forgot to bid is offline  
Old 01-16-2013, 06:47 PM
  #120239  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Position: C560XL/XLS/XLS+
Posts: 1,278
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
That's a small baby and the mothers stomach looks like she is sporting a six pack and while big, no flinching and they don't look swollen.

More tease than please. I say that is a fake photo.

How about this photo? Can this work?

Evander! Is that you?
dalad is offline  
Old 01-16-2013, 06:51 PM
  #120240  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,014
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
How about this photo? Can they work?

Got no idea if they can work.

But man, couldn't I use some of those tax deductions?
Bucking Bar is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices