Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-14-2013, 02:40 PM
  #119961  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFDX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 1,804
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149
Target.............just kidding Elvis

Seriously, Elvis, what is the pod just aft of the nose gear. If you can tell me without killing me

Ferd
The Sniper XR targeting pod is being integrated on the B-1 fleet. The pod is mounted on an external hardpoint at the aircraft's chin near the forward bomb bay. Following accelerated testing, the Sniper pod was fielded in summer 2008.

From wikipedia so I don't have to kill you.
USMCFDX is offline  
Old 01-14-2013, 02:46 PM
  #119962  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ferd149's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: LAX ERA
Posts: 3,457
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFDX
The Sniper XR targeting pod is being integrated on the B-1 fleet. The pod is mounted on an external hardpoint at the aircraft's chin near the forward bomb bay. Following accelerated testing, the Sniper pod was fielded in summer 2008.

From wikipedia so I don't have to kill you.
Yeah, cool article............thanks. I guess my days of hitting the ground somewhere on the range just ain't good enough anymore
Ferd149 is offline  
Old 01-14-2013, 02:54 PM
  #119963  
Gets Weekends Off
 
nwaf16dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 737A
Posts: 1,890
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFDX
The Sniper XR targeting pod is being integrated on the B-1 fleet. The pod is mounted on an external hardpoint at the aircraft's chin near the forward bomb bay. Following accelerated testing, the Sniper pod was fielded in summer 2008.

From wikipedia so I don't have to kill you.
Flew with the Sniper pod a bunch...it's an awesome piece of hardware, even when you don't have three extra guys to run it.
nwaf16dude is offline  
Old 01-14-2013, 03:03 PM
  #119964  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 581
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
I second the request for pics.

Yours is definitely the peak of GM / Corvette design. Which wheels do you have on yours? What color?

Last year I was half way looking for a 67 327 / 350. Briefly had a 72 LS5 steel cities grey convertible.
Best pics I have were taken before I bought it with my friend's nephew at the wheel. Probably not appropriate to put his picture on the Internet without his okay.

Color is Laguna blue, white vinyl top, dark blue vinyl seats. Wheels right now are the stock stamped steel wheels with factory hubcaps. 1966 was the last year of the (optional) true knock-off wheels. Originals in nice shape are obscenely expensive. Even the reproduction ones are over $500 each.

This year I plan to get a set of "period correct" American Racing Torq Thrust wheels with some slightly wider tires.

First Corvette was a 1973 454/ 4-speed Coupe. It was bright yellow with a black leather interior.
Wasatch Phantom is offline  
Old 01-14-2013, 03:21 PM
  #119965  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by Wasatch Phantom
Best pics I have were taken before I bought it with my friend's nephew at the wheel. Probably not appropriate to put his picture on the Internet without his okay.

Color is Laguna blue, white vinyl top, dark blue vinyl seats. Wheels right now are the stock stamped steel wheels with factory hubcaps. 1966 was the last year of the (optional) true knock-off wheels. Originals in nice shape are obscenely expensive. Even the reproduction ones are over $500 each.

This year I plan to get a set of "period correct" American Racing Torq Thrust wheels with some slightly wider tires.

First Corvette was a 1973 454/ 4-speed Coupe. It was bright yellow with a black leather interior.
Yokahama advans are the best performance tire I have ever used. FWIW. Michelins on the trucks and advans on the muscle and sports cars. You would be impressed with the difference.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 01-14-2013, 03:29 PM
  #119966  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Posts: 403
Default

Has anyone else noticed how well our stock is doing? Seems to be slowly sliding up a few pennies each day....
p3flteng is offline  
Old 01-14-2013, 03:30 PM
  #119967  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Not necessarilly. Maybe WRT the AK/KLM JV that could be correct, but at least WRT the FT/DT regs I don't think we can say that yet.

Many think the company will be chomping at the bit to get 2 pilots ops for 9 block hours and 3 pilot ops one hour over the current limit for 4.

But that hinges around a provision in the new rules that eliminate the "legal to start legal to finish" aspect of that one rule. IOW, it becomes a hard time, projected at throttle up, or a gate return must occur. Not only does this make 8:59 2 pilot ops a risk, it makes 8:01 pilot ops a risk. Assuming the average for 8-9 hour 2 pilot ops would be 8:30, that means that, on average, any 30 minute delay would cause a gate return and possible cancellation or massive re-crew delay. They will spend far more money on that than they will save axing the number of FO positions on the 8-9 hour only flights, not to mention the hits to the operation and subsequent follow on costs. There may be a few 8:03 turns they would like to have and would be willing to carry the risks, especially if they were multipile leg hub to hub days where they could recrew easier, but we would obviously want something for that, so what we wanted, even if minimal, would likely blow the cost savings of that tiny rarely used benefit out of the water in the first place.

As for the 8-9 hour 2 crew ops, the potential savings is minimal and the inherent costs and risks are steep and statistically guaranteed. I just don't see the company eager to come to the negotiating table and give us anything to get something they, after careful review, would likely not really even want.
Of course there is nothing to say that those kind of ops have to occur year-round. The company has reams of data on the reliability of flights to and from... say... FRA from JFK. There might be a couple of months where they stand to have a 99% reliability of performing both ways under 9 hours, and would be willing to run that risk. The bean counters have micrometers out, and they have the history to back up their decisions. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see something like that.
tsquare is offline  
Old 01-14-2013, 03:49 PM
  #119968  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sinca3's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 917
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
Yokahama advans are the best performance tire I have ever used. FWIW. Michelins on the trucks and advans on the muscle and sports cars. You would be impressed with the difference.
You've never used Michelin PSS's then!
sinca3 is offline  
Old 01-14-2013, 03:52 PM
  #119969  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Permanently scarred
Posts: 1,707
Default

Anyone interested in the coin I'm selling?
GunshipGuy is offline  
Old 01-14-2013, 04:01 PM
  #119970  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by sinca3
You've never used Michelin PSS's then!
What initially drew me to yokahamas (from michelins) was the buzz about them on the mini forum plus they're a very high mileage tire. Put them on the mini S and they started replicating when I needed new meats.

Michelin makes great tires, no doubt.

There are a ton of junky tires out there and frankly I've run them all. There is a definite difference when you switch to great performance tires.

IMO the worst (brand name tires) are kumho's.
scambo1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices