Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
so Starbucks isn't letting me hang out and post on APCF anymore.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
I'm in agreement that should be all about numbers and not politics.... However we live in a world where people don't always think the same way we do, and thus undertake paths that you or I might not choose. There are pluses and minuses to methods, I prefer the slower and deliberate method to be employed more often than we have seen, but I also recognize that there are times when the Reps have elected a team they trust to "execute" the direction of the MEC, they put the team in place, let them do their job, and not necessarily call a meeting to vote on everything that comes along.
I'm with you completely on the dissemination of info in these types of matters. I'd love to see the TAJV "scope report card" just like most everyone here, but I'm not going start complaining when I just got a good quality update on another section of the scope clause.
george: "...but that information doesnt seem to be forthcoming..."
I should have merely said: How do you know? It has only been 3 days since the new Chairman took office.
Does that work Sink?
I'm with you completely on the dissemination of info in these types of matters. I'd love to see the TAJV "scope report card" just like most everyone here, but I'm not going start complaining when I just got a good quality update on another section of the scope clause.
george: "...but that information doesnt seem to be forthcoming..."
I should have merely said: How do you know? It has only been 3 days since the new Chairman took office.
Does that work Sink?
Results, of course, are driven by strategy and tactics. I didn't get the impression George was asking for impatient, hot-headed moves. I'm not going to speak for him, but deliberate is always fine with me. You can, of course, be deliberate and not be slow.
Thanks LUV!
What is the difference between a paper ZED and an EZED?
My understanding is we list via the id90 site linked in Travelnet and then have to actually pick them up/pay for them at a DL ticket counter? Is that about right?
Can I get a paper and/or EZED the day of travel? Or do they need to be bought a few days in advance?
Thanks again
What is the difference between a paper ZED and an EZED?
My understanding is we list via the id90 site linked in Travelnet and then have to actually pick them up/pay for them at a DL ticket counter? Is that about right?
Can I get a paper and/or EZED the day of travel? Or do they need to be bought a few days in advance?
Thanks again
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: DAL FO
Posts: 2,192
Go to travelnet> leisure travel> Interline travel> then MyIDtravel, click confirm, then the Booking/listing menu. It'll walk you through listing and paying for etickets. I've never used it for hawaiian, but it looks like it will work for them. I used it for some SWA tickets over the holidays and it worked like a charm. No paper tickets or trips to the ticket counter involved.
I've been a thorn in the side of many schedulers, particularly on this issue. And your scenario doesn't make sense. If they give you a 5 hour call out immediately from rest, that's fine, but when did you know about it? If you chose not to check your schedule on your 24 hour FAR rest where you have no obligation to the company whatsoever, then you didn't know about it until you were forced to check your schedule at the end of that rest. That means those 5 hours in between can't be considered as lookback rest for that day's assignment. In other words, you have a 5 hour shorter duty day because that time is included in your duty day per the FAR's.
Or, if, as you say, you are truly on long call, then the only way for that to happen is for you to check your schedule the minute you leave FAR rest, see nothing on your line, and then go to long call, which is 12 hours or 10 for SC. In that case there would be no 5 hour call out.
Now as pilots we are an inquisitive bunch, and obsess over few things more than our schedules. We simply "have to know" so we in most cases freely chose to schedule check during an FAR rest, so most of the time this issue of legality resolves itself. But we don't have to, and the company can't make us otherwise that is an FAR violation of FAR rest and would require a new 24 hours of FAR rest from the moment of any "required" schedule check. Find me one scheduler that thinks that makes me their "favorite" and I will buy you a case of beer.
Regardless of the 24 hour FAR rest issue though, there is a dangerous line of legality some are walking WRT green slipping a report while on long call under 9 hours. While 9 to 11:59 prior is a legitimate and legal GS, under 9, especially under 8, is begging for an FAR violation as you can't use time spent on long call as retroactive look back rest. That is a dirty little secret no one wants to address but it stays under the radar because its very hard to track and prove, for now. But its illegal nonetheless.
Or, if, as you say, you are truly on long call, then the only way for that to happen is for you to check your schedule the minute you leave FAR rest, see nothing on your line, and then go to long call, which is 12 hours or 10 for SC. In that case there would be no 5 hour call out.
Now as pilots we are an inquisitive bunch, and obsess over few things more than our schedules. We simply "have to know" so we in most cases freely chose to schedule check during an FAR rest, so most of the time this issue of legality resolves itself. But we don't have to, and the company can't make us otherwise that is an FAR violation of FAR rest and would require a new 24 hours of FAR rest from the moment of any "required" schedule check. Find me one scheduler that thinks that makes me their "favorite" and I will buy you a case of beer.
Regardless of the 24 hour FAR rest issue though, there is a dangerous line of legality some are walking WRT green slipping a report while on long call under 9 hours. While 9 to 11:59 prior is a legitimate and legal GS, under 9, especially under 8, is begging for an FAR violation as you can't use time spent on long call as retroactive look back rest. That is a dirty little secret no one wants to address but it stays under the radar because its very hard to track and prove, for now. But its illegal nonetheless.
This is one of those things that people do to "go along to get along", but it only takes one or two intrepid types to write letters to the FAA asking for an interpretation.
That's how Whitlow got started. A couple of guys called "BS", and decided to do something about it. And without it, we'd still be sitting 24 hour reserve domestically.
Nu
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
For non-EZed companies (ie paper tickets) they still want you to go to the link on Dl net and it will take all you info and send it to Delta ticketing. They will (I've had some go through in 1 hr, some took 2 days) create a listing for you on the airline and send you a record locator back to your email which you take to a delta counter and zip, with one swipe all your tickets are spit out so it takes the agent about a minute to do.
Just for a point of order, if you have a paper zed for two city pairs, the other airlines will accept that ticket as well, so you only really need one Zed between two city pairs and you can use on any airline that is using paper zed tickets still, ie UAL, AAL, etc.
Lastly, the agent can put a listing in for you at the counter in a pinch situation(ie stuck in hnl and need to get out) but it takes them about 5 mins per ticket (if they are the quick ones) and it helps to have some chocolates or kind words to get them to do it as it does take them away from other tasks especially if they are checking in lots of pax.
Enjoy the islands!
Aloha,
LUV
Runs with scissors
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,756
so it looks as if you guys are buying us, we are either the next comair, or the next destroy, rebuild and sell for huge profits. I have always wondered this question, maybe someone can answer it for me. I am not suggesting that this should happen or that we even deserve it but what is the difference lets say between delta buying alaska and delta buying pinnacle. Both have unions but in one case it would trigger a pilot seniority list integration and in the other it does nothing. What does your scope clause say about this or does nothing happen because one is a regional? Its just a question that I have always been curious about. What is ALPA nationals position on the matter? Also, please dont view this post as a regional punk just trying to get to mainline, Im just trying to understand policy in these situations.
Wayy back when Delta bought both Com Air and ASA, many of us Mainline pilots wanted to put them all on our list. We knew then, and saw later, that if we didn't get them all under our contract, that more and more of our small jet flying would be outsourced to them, as it eventually was. I was a MD88 Capt. in 1992 and lost my Capt. seat for the next 8 years, as Delta sold off the DC9 and 737-200 fleets, while Delta bought hundreds of bigger and bigger RJ's for ASA and Com Air pilots to fly.
When the Delta MEC approached the ASA and Com Air MEC's about filing for single carrier status, and a single seniority list, of course the RJ guys wanted Date of Hire, which would have put JC Lawson into the left seat of a Delta 767, at over $160,000yr. at that time. Needless to say, that idea didn't go over real well at mainline, and the issue was dropped.
Later, when Delta furloughed, JC and his boys told our furloughed guys to resign from Delta and get in line, at the bottom of their list. But when Com Air went on strike to get better pay/benefits, many of us Mainline guys supported them, I walked in circles for hours in MCO with a sign, even made the cover of the ALPA magazine.
You now see what that strike cost Com Air. Delta Management sent a message, and I think most of the RJ guys understand it now, "Strike, and we will replace you..."
Why ALPA National allows it is beyond me. They want your dues money, of course, but they don't want to take a stand. Without the leverage of a national work stoppage, the whipsawing will continue. Nobody at National has the stones for that, because they might have to go to jail, and give up that fat paycheck.
Your beef is not with the Delta Mainline Pilots, nobody at National cares what we want. Talk to the clowns in DC making $500,000yr. who haven't flown an airplane in years. When the B scales came, they didn't say No. When the RJ's took our jobs, they didn't say NO! When we all lost our retirements, they didn't say NO!, So, when do you think they will? Ever?
I expect they will eventually allow cabotage without a work stoppage as well....
Wayy back when Delta bought both Com Air and ASA, many of us Mainline pilots wanted to put them all on our list. We knew then, and saw later, that if we didn't get them all under our contract, that more and more of our small jet flying would be outsourced to them, as it eventually was. I was a MD88 Capt. in 1992 and lost my Capt. seat for the next 8 years, as Delta sold off the DC9 and 737-200 fleets, while Delta bought hundreds of bigger and bigger RJ's for ASA and Com Air pilots to fly.
When the Delta MEC approached the ASA and Com Air MEC's about filing for single carrier status, and a single seniority list, of course the RJ guys wanted Date of Hire, which would have put JC Lawson into the left seat of a Delta 767, at over $160,000yr. at that time. Needless to say, that idea didn't go over real well at mainline, and the issue was dropped.
Later, when Delta furloughed, JC and his boys told our furloughed guys to resign from Delta and get in line, at the bottom of their list. But when Com Air went on strike to get better pay/benefits, many of us Mainline guys supported them, I walked in circles for hours in MCO with a sign, even made the cover of the ALPA magazine.
You now see what that strike cost Com Air. Delta Management sent a message, and I think most of the RJ guys understand it now, "Strike, and we will replace you..."
Why ALPA National allows it is beyond me. They want your dues money, of course, but they don't want to take a stand. Without the leverage of a national work stoppage, the whipsawing will continue. Nobody at National has the stones for that, because they might have to go to jail, and give up that fat paycheck.
Your beef is not with the Delta Mainline Pilots, nobody at National cares what we want. Talk to the clowns in DC making $500,000yr. who haven't flown an airplane in years. When the B scales came, they didn't say No. When the RJ's took our jobs, they didn't say NO! When we all lost our retirements, they didn't say NO!, So, when do you think they will? Ever?
I expect they will eventually allow cabotage without a work stoppage as well....
When the Delta MEC approached the ASA and Com Air MEC's about filing for single carrier status, and a single seniority list, of course the RJ guys wanted Date of Hire, which would have put JC Lawson into the left seat of a Delta 767, at over $160,000yr. at that time. Needless to say, that idea didn't go over real well at mainline, and the issue was dropped.
Later, when Delta furloughed, JC and his boys told our furloughed guys to resign from Delta and get in line, at the bottom of their list. But when Com Air went on strike to get better pay/benefits, many of us Mainline guys supported them, I walked in circles for hours in MCO with a sign, even made the cover of the ALPA magazine.
You now see what that strike cost Com Air. Delta Management sent a message, and I think most of the RJ guys understand it now, "Strike, and we will replace you..."
Why ALPA National allows it is beyond me. They want your dues money, of course, but they don't want to take a stand. Without the leverage of a national work stoppage, the whipsawing will continue. Nobody at National has the stones for that, because they might have to go to jail, and give up that fat paycheck.
Your beef is not with the Delta Mainline Pilots, nobody at National cares what we want. Talk to the clowns in DC making $500,000yr. who haven't flown an airplane in years. When the B scales came, they didn't say No. When the RJ's took our jobs, they didn't say NO! When we all lost our retirements, they didn't say NO!, So, when do you think they will? Ever?
I expect they will eventually allow cabotage without a work stoppage as well....
TEN
Runs with scissors
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,756
Thanks for the kind words Ten, as the years go by and I keep seeing the same stupid stuff going round and round, my Grumpy Old Man syndrom is kicking in, I may just have to run for....something, just so I can go to a meeting and scream at somebody!
Here's the 'problem' as it has been explained to me by many ALPA reps I have been close friends with over the years. The Reps say, "It's the pilots, they won't support a work stoppage". But when I talk to the pilots, they say, "It's the leadership, they won't lead us!"
So it becomes a circular argument, the only winner is; Management.
The next question is (in song form):
"Will the circle be unbroken, bye and bye Lord, bye and bye..."
When will we, as a pilot group, demand more of our leadership? Should our leadership demand more of us, if we are not coming to meetings or showing up to vote??
Given that most guys don't even vote for their LEC leadership, and sure as heck are not about to walk away from their jobs, how do you motivate that guy to take a stand?
Gotta run now and generate some more revenue for DAL, at least I'm getting 8.5% more to do it today...now, if I could only get my DB money back, I could quit this job and go sailing!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post