Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
01-02-2013, 04:16 PM
Da Hudge
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Specifically that 3209- ~3249 will be replaced by the 739 lift.
It's subject to change, but that dodging the issue is the highest liklihood for how it will transpire.
While aircraft are being replaced, it should not be discounted that in the same breath the mainline fleet is planned to grow from around 720 to 796. If you discount one, you have to discount the other.
01-02-2013, 04:18 PM
Da Hudge
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
01-02-2013, 04:19 PM
Da Hudge
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
01-02-2013, 04:21 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 302
01-02-2013, 04:55 PM
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
01-02-2013, 04:57 PM
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
It was stated at official meetings, and on numerous ocassions. Logic would dictate that is what is planned to happen.
Specifically that 3209- ~3249 will be replaced by the 739 lift.
It's subject to change, but that dodging the issue is the highest liklihood for how it will transpire.
While aircraft are being replaced, it should not be discounted that in the same breath the mainline fleet is planned to grow from around 720 to 796. If you discount one, you have to discount the other.
Specifically that 3209- ~3249 will be replaced by the 739 lift.
It's subject to change, but that dodging the issue is the highest liklihood for how it will transpire.
While aircraft are being replaced, it should not be discounted that in the same breath the mainline fleet is planned to grow from around 720 to 796. If you discount one, you have to discount the other.
It's quite possible that 3209-3249 are parked, but there has not been any official statement released to the pilot group. That's been my entire point.
01-02-2013, 05:09 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 302
01-02-2013, 05:10 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: "Prof" button manipulator
Posts: 1,685
It was stated at official meetings, and on numerous ocassions. Logic would dictate that is what is planned to happen.
Specifically that 3209- ~3249 will be replaced by the 739 lift.
It's subject to change, but that dodging the issue is the highest liklihood for how it will transpire.
While aircraft are being replaced, it should not be discounted that in the same breath the mainline fleet is planned to grow from around 720 to 796. If you discount one, you have to discount the other.
Specifically that 3209- ~3249 will be replaced by the 739 lift.
It's subject to change, but that dodging the issue is the highest liklihood for how it will transpire.
While aircraft are being replaced, it should not be discounted that in the same breath the mainline fleet is planned to grow from around 720 to 796. If you discount one, you have to discount the other.
The force is strong amongst the both of you!
Stated to whom? At what meetings? People run rampant with unsubstantiated rumors on this thread, & it results in more silly rumors. That is a general statement, & not directed at you.
It's quite possible that 3209-3249 are parked, but there has not been any official statement released to the pilot group. That's been my entire point.
It's quite possible that 3209-3249 are parked, but there has not been any official statement released to the pilot group. That's been my entire point.
Last edited by Elliot; 01-02-2013 at 05:27 PM.
01-02-2013, 05:51 PM
veut gagner à la loterie
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
somebody tell Louisville they're 14 point underdogs.
01-02-2013, 05:59 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: LAX ERA
Posts: 3,457
It's cold'ern $hit in Hotlanta tonight. Sayz the Arizona boy
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
