Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,576
ACL,
SOOOO. It has been almost a month since the predictions of a plan/purchase, etc. Do you think your leak played you or should we expect some form of announcement soon? Read something recently that ual, aa and lcc are not as bad off as some analcysts have predicted.
SOOOO. It has been almost a month since the predictions of a plan/purchase, etc. Do you think your leak played you or should we expect some form of announcement soon? Read something recently that ual, aa and lcc are not as bad off as some analcysts have predicted.
I think the good things are still in the works if not coming really soon. We're a strong airline all things considered and we're still looking at cutting jobs soon, I wouldn't be surprised if other airlines are looking at making major changes soon as well that could be to our benefit. Just a hunch.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,596
Why not? We have an economic argument that bringing the outsourced subcontracted flying back to mainline is a net gain for the company. That is the only way we are going to get it back is by convincing the board there is a ROI. Anderson is a brand control type of guy. DCI is ruining the brand. The public is turning against the RJ because of comfort and safety. We could be the first legacy to run our own "big plane, little plane" add ala SWA.
And if it takes a strike, so be it.
And if it takes a strike, so be it.
Your economic argument has been fought over, discussed, checked, verified and more by many experts at both DALPA and the company in both LOA 46 and the chapter 11 contract. They were rehashed again in joint contract. The only aircraft we can come close to flying at a economic rate matching the current DCI block hour rate is the E170/175 and even that may be to big a spread to be viable on a economic basis unless we can force the other majors to bring the flying back on a timely basis also. I would support a all out effort to do that in the next contract.
There will be new elections and new people at DALPA soon. When many of those people who are strong on scope see the real numbers and the overall effects of markets served and feed to the mainline as they access confidential data they will vote and act the same as the current members. The only advantage is we wont be facing a 1113 motion again unless fuel soars in price which should let us make some scope gains.
If you recall it was not me who stated that. It was someone else, But yes all of that stuff he hinted at should be public soon.....
Why not? We have an economic argument that bringing the outsourced subcontracted flying back to mainline is a net gain for the company. That is the only way we are going to get it back is by convincing the board there is a ROI. Anderson is a brand control type of guy. DCI is ruining the brand. The public is turning against the RJ because of comfort and safety. We could be the first legacy to run our own "big plane, little plane" add ala SWA.
Last edited by TheWagman; 08-07-2009 at 08:58 AM. Reason: grammar
Your economic argument has been fought over, discussed, checked, verified and more by many experts at both DALPA and the company in both LOA 46 and the chapter 11 contract. They were rehashed again in joint contract. The only aircraft we can come close to flying at a economic rate matching the current DCI block hour rate is the E170/175 and even that may be to big a spread to be viable on a economic basis unless we can force the other majors to bring the flying back on a timely basis also. I would support a all out effort to do that in the next contract.
There will be new elections and new people at DALPA soon. When many of those people who are strong on scope see the real numbers and the overall effects of markets served and feed to the mainline as they access confidential data they will vote and act the same as the current members. The only advantage is we wont be facing a 1113 motion again unless fuel soars in price which should let us make some scope gains.
There will be new elections and new people at DALPA soon. When many of those people who are strong on scope see the real numbers and the overall effects of markets served and feed to the mainline as they access confidential data they will vote and act the same as the current members. The only advantage is we wont be facing a 1113 motion again unless fuel soars in price which should let us make some scope gains.
Also, I was under the impression that the MEC chose to take no action on the resolution to regenerate new numbers for DCI. It is my understanding that the numbers that the MEC has been presented are from the 1113C era. It is time for new numbers.
I do not see these announcements of further Admin and Exec positions as much of a surprise. They have been doing a lot of this as of late. MSP is a ghost town.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post