Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2009, 07:59 AM
  #11861  
Underboob King
 
Superpilot92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Guppy Commander
Posts: 4,412
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
How does one insert a photo here?
I use photobucket.com to get the codes that allow you to post pics on forums.
Superpilot92 is offline  
Old 08-07-2009, 08:32 AM
  #11862  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,576
Default

ACL,

SOOOO. It has been almost a month since the predictions of a plan/purchase, etc. Do you think your leak played you or should we expect some form of announcement soon? Read something recently that ual, aa and lcc are not as bad off as some analcysts have predicted.
NERD is offline  
Old 08-07-2009, 08:33 AM
  #11863  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by Superpilot92
I use photobucket.com to get the codes that allow you to post pics on forums.



Hey!!!! Thanks Super. It only took me 30 mins to figure out!!

Last edited by newKnow; 08-07-2009 at 09:11 AM.
newKnow is offline  
Old 08-07-2009, 08:38 AM
  #11864  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by NERD
ACL,

SOOOO. It has been almost a month since the predictions of a plan/purchase, etc. Do you think your leak played you or should we expect some form of announcement soon? Read something recently that ual, aa and lcc are not as bad off as some analcysts have predicted.
I think the good things are still in the works if not coming really soon. We're a strong airline all things considered and we're still looking at cutting jobs soon, I wouldn't be surprised if other airlines are looking at making major changes soon as well that could be to our benefit. Just a hunch.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 08-07-2009, 08:39 AM
  #11865  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,596
Default

Originally Posted by satchip
Why not? We have an economic argument that bringing the outsourced subcontracted flying back to mainline is a net gain for the company. That is the only way we are going to get it back is by convincing the board there is a ROI. Anderson is a brand control type of guy. DCI is ruining the brand. The public is turning against the RJ because of comfort and safety. We could be the first legacy to run our own "big plane, little plane" add ala SWA.

And if it takes a strike, so be it.

Your economic argument has been fought over, discussed, checked, verified and more by many experts at both DALPA and the company in both LOA 46 and the chapter 11 contract. They were rehashed again in joint contract. The only aircraft we can come close to flying at a economic rate matching the current DCI block hour rate is the E170/175 and even that may be to big a spread to be viable on a economic basis unless we can force the other majors to bring the flying back on a timely basis also. I would support a all out effort to do that in the next contract.

There will be new elections and new people at DALPA soon. When many of those people who are strong on scope see the real numbers and the overall effects of markets served and feed to the mainline as they access confidential data they will vote and act the same as the current members. The only advantage is we wont be facing a 1113 motion again unless fuel soars in price which should let us make some scope gains.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 08-07-2009, 08:54 AM
  #11866  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by NERD
ACL,

SOOOO. It has been almost a month since the predictions of a plan/purchase, etc. Do you think your leak played you or should we expect some form of announcement soon? Read something recently that ual, aa and lcc are not as bad off as some analysts have predicted.
If you recall it was not me who stated that. It was someone else, But yes all of that stuff he hinted at should be public soon.....
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 08-07-2009, 08:57 AM
  #11867  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheWagman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 218
Default

Originally Posted by satchip
Why not? We have an economic argument that bringing the outsourced subcontracted flying back to mainline is a net gain for the company. That is the only way we are going to get it back is by convincing the board there is a ROI. Anderson is a brand control type of guy. DCI is ruining the brand. The public is turning against the RJ because of comfort and safety. We could be the first legacy to run our own "big plane, little plane" add ala SWA.
Would this qualify for the "Cash for Clunkers" program 3 crj's for a A319 and we'd still be reducing seats!

Last edited by TheWagman; 08-07-2009 at 08:58 AM. Reason: grammar
TheWagman is offline  
Old 08-07-2009, 08:58 AM
  #11868  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Your economic argument has been fought over, discussed, checked, verified and more by many experts at both DALPA and the company in both LOA 46 and the chapter 11 contract. They were rehashed again in joint contract. The only aircraft we can come close to flying at a economic rate matching the current DCI block hour rate is the E170/175 and even that may be to big a spread to be viable on a economic basis unless we can force the other majors to bring the flying back on a timely basis also. I would support a all out effort to do that in the next contract.

There will be new elections and new people at DALPA soon. When many of those people who are strong on scope see the real numbers and the overall effects of markets served and feed to the mainline as they access confidential data they will vote and act the same as the current members. The only advantage is we wont be facing a 1113 motion again unless fuel soars in price which should let us make some scope gains.
I think that we are all talking about the 170/175 Sailing. And all of the anecdotal fixes to keep them from growing DCI once those jets are on board.
Also, I was under the impression that the MEC chose to take no action on the resolution to regenerate new numbers for DCI. It is my understanding that the numbers that the MEC has been presented are from the 1113C era. It is time for new numbers.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 08-07-2009, 09:00 AM
  #11869  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by TheWagman
Would this qualify for the "Cash for Clunkers" program 3 crj's for a A319 and we'd still be reducing seats!
You sir, have the idea of the day. Maybe we should ask the President. I mean after all it would reduce Co2 omissions too
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 08-07-2009, 09:07 AM
  #11870  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

I do not see these announcements of further Admin and Exec positions as much of a surprise. They have been doing a lot of this as of late. MSP is a ghost town.
acl65pilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices