Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-18-2012, 09:41 AM
  #118251  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

i used to have a coex leather jacket, i think they took the leather off a 10’ couch to make it. it was so dang thick and heavy, my wife forbid it out of the closet. got a higher end one due to another job, that's stuck in the closet too.

are leather jackets out of style? i really liked them. but i do live in Gawga and its going to be seventy here tomorrow so you never wear them.

you know its one thing for socal not to have seasons because is California. Gawga is just pine trees. they start about 6’ from the side of the road and its all you see. 100’ tall mangy skinny trees. after nine years in this state i find it has no personality, is very warm, has ugly trees, and it has an unknown view due to those same ugly trees.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 12-18-2012, 09:42 AM
  #118252  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jughead's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: ATL717A
Posts: 890
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
Delta is a very imagine obsessed carrier
I'm not familiar with this.

What was your job, after the vetting process?
Jughead is offline  
Old 12-18-2012, 09:50 AM
  #118253  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by Jughead
I'm not familiar with this.

What was your job, after the vetting process?
It should say image, not imagine, typo. To give you an example, I was flying CRJ 900's around the system when we were painting the 900's in Delta colors. This was so Delta had Delta paint on certain airplanes on certain routes to show off the new 900 paint jobs. I had 4 days that typically looked like this: Ferry a Delta colored plane from DTW - SLC, fly 1 revenue leg SLC-BOI, Ferry BOI - JFK. Fly JFK - BOS, ferry BOS - MEM, pick up another Delta color airplane, ferry MEM - SLC, Pick up NWA colored airplane in SLC, ferry SLC - DTW. Delta paid millions those months to show off our 900's painted in Delta colors. Nobody even cared what color the plane was painted in except DAL management.


I was in customer service through college, then I was in tech ops mgt after college, got laid off during the bankruptcy in 2005, then got hired at Mesaba as a pilot.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 12-18-2012, 10:26 AM
  #118254  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,233
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
..Delta paid millions those months to show off our 900's painted in Delta colors. Nobody even cared what color the plane was painted in except DAL management.
..
My college marketing professor would be very proud. He used to say "he, who doesn't want to pay for brand recognition, will pay twice!"
Shouldn't every company do that?

P.S. I am glad the times of former FA's running network and putting 777's on Florida turns are gone. Nothing to do with paint, but it's good to see common sense.
Lifeisgood is offline  
Old 12-18-2012, 10:40 AM
  #118255  
Sho me da money!
 
FIIGMO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: B25, Left
Posts: 947
Default

Anyone know why it is in the best interest of our REVENUE paying customers to be subjected to extremely poor service and nasty flight attendants because they choose to work 14 hr coast to coast back to backs several days in a row?

Everyone gets tired from work, I get that. But these flight attendants have been absolutely nasty and very unpleasant to work with. The customer suffers because these FA's get burned out and of course are tired. It is affecting not only the passengers but the other crew as well. Nasty and rude is not what anyone wants to deal with at 2230 before and during a coast to coast redeye. Work rules should be adjusted to optimize for the passenger and safety experience. By not allowing this and a HOST of other measures will cull the group as well as increase the customer experience which will lead to solid revenue. Until then we are doomed with regard to JV's and the superior service some other carriers provide will sway high $$ passengers to make other choices..

Rant over.
FIIGMO is offline  
Old 12-18-2012, 10:57 AM
  #118256  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by FIIGMO
Anyone know why it is in the best interest of our REVENUE paying customers to be subjected to extremely poor service and nasty flight attendants because they choose to work 14 hr coast to coast back to backs several days in a row?

Everyone gets tired from work, I get that. But these flight attendants have been absolutely nasty and very unpleasant to work with. The customer suffers because these FA's get burned out and of course are tired. It is affecting not only the passengers but the other crew as well. Nasty and rude is not what anyone wants to deal with at 2230 before and during a coast to coast redeye. Work rules should be adjusted to optimize for the passenger and safety experience. By not allowing this and a HOST of other measures will cull the group as well as increase the customer experience which will lead to solid revenue. Until then we are doomed with regard to JV's and the superior service some other carriers provide will sway high $$ passengers to make other choices..

Rant over.
It is a core belief of mine that some people are just nastier than others. They are rude when they are well rested and they are ruder when they are tired. IMO, this is a leadership issue - as in flight leader / Capt leadership. Attitude dictates behavior.

Twice in my DAL career, since noone else was going to do it, I have told crewmmebers that they are way out of line and need to get a handle on their rottenness. (short story version)

Once in my time here, I told an FA never to say another word to me, ever.

I can be rude too. But I believe in management at the point of infraction, not writing stuff up, to be maybe handled two weeks later, if ever.

That said, it take more than one observable negative behavior to get my real attention. You are a big boy, handle it.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 12-18-2012, 11:17 AM
  #118257  
Sho me da money!
 
FIIGMO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: B25, Left
Posts: 947
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
It is a core belief of mine that some people are just nastier than others. They are rude when they are well rested and they are ruder when they are tired. IMO, this is a leadership issue - as in flight leader / Capt leadership. Attitude dictates behavior.

Twice in my DAL career, since noone else was going to do it, I have told crewmmebers that they are way out of line and need to get a handle on their rottenness. (short story version)

Once in my time here, I told an FA never to say another word to me, ever.

I can be rude too. But I believe in management at the point of infraction, not writing stuff up, to be maybe handled two weeks later, if ever.

That said, it take more than one observable negative behavior to get my real attention. You are a big boy, handle it.
My point Scambo is that environments have an effect on ones behavior. Trust me I have said what I felt was needed to be said when I thought it was warranted. So I certainly can handle it, you imply I can not. SO I will take your tone in a positive way instead of looking at it as an attack.

Back to the point. DAL Mgt should address this issue and the only way they can deal with it is if it does get brought to their attention. A nasty rude flight attendant will not like what I have to say. But I also try to give them a benefit of the doubt and not judge too quick without observing a little before I feel the need to step in and say something. The point is simple, most of these flight attendants do it to themselves to work until they are exhausted because they can and the customer suffers. Delta needs to fix that. I can speak up for myself and stand my ground "like a big boy" when needed. The passenger who asks for a glass of water and is given attitude and simply ignored cannot. That is when DAL needs to know about it.
FIIGMO is offline  
Old 12-18-2012, 11:40 AM
  #118258  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by SailorJerry
DALPA clearly tipped their hand on how they felt about flows in the Summer of 2010 when they opted out of the full negotiated extent of the letters. DAL would have honored the full agreement, but DALPA (and DAL) wanted out, so they shut it down. Sure we have 300-400 more flows to go, but that's it.
What you typed above is innacurate, incomplete and misleading. The PWA required flow-down to remain available; it did not require flow-up. DAL Flight Ops management was the group that wanted out of flow (comments of 10,000 applicants for 80 positions). DALPA negotiated to ensure those on the CPZ property at that time (where flow-down was maintained) kept their rights, and one year's worth of XJT flows (where there wasn't flow-down) still kept their slots. Saying that DALPA "shut it down" is not factual; quite the opposite, in fact.

Originally Posted by SailorJerry
Our pilot selection process and our training methods aren't compatible with just anyone. I hate to sound so egomaniacal when I say that, but having been through the process, I can assure you it has a specific target that is, honestly, a rare breed.
I'm sure you can tell who the Delta pilots that came from NWA, Republic, Hughes Air West, North Central, Western, National and Pan Am without going through the DAL pilot selection process are immediately...not.

It's interesting to me that guys (not you) who routinely bash our management and our company are so protective of management's prerogative on who to hire. I think we're a great group of pilots, but the blending that has taken place belies the "pilot selection" theory, imo.
slowplay is offline  
Old 12-18-2012, 11:46 AM
  #118259  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
What you typed above is innacurate, incomplete and misleading. The PWA required flow-down to remain available; it did not require flow-up. DAL Flight Ops management was the group that wanted out of flow (comments of 10,000 applicants for 80 positions). DALPA negotiated to ensure those on the CPZ property at that time (where flow-down was maintained) kept their rights, and one year's worth of XJT flows (where there wasn't flow-down) still kept their slots. Saying that DALPA "shut it down" is not factual; quite the opposite, in fact.
This is 100% correct, the union at XJ fought hard with DALPA to keep the flow intact, it was DAL management that wanted out of the flow.

There is some type of flow agreement in the 9E TA we just don't know the details yet.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 12-18-2012, 11:54 AM
  #118260  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,940
Default

Originally Posted by FIIGMO
Anyone know why it is in the best interest of our REVENUE paying customers to be subjected to extremely poor service and nasty flight attendants because they choose to work 14 hr coast to coast back to backs several days in a row?

Everyone gets tired from work, I get that. But these flight attendants have been absolutely nasty and very unpleasant to work with. The customer suffers because these FA's get burned out and of course are tired. It is affecting not only the passengers but the other crew as well. Nasty and rude is not what anyone wants to deal with at 2230 before and during a coast to coast redeye. Work rules should be adjusted to optimize for the passenger and safety experience. By not allowing this and a HOST of other measures will cull the group as well as increase the customer experience which will lead to solid revenue. Until then we are doomed with regard to JV's and the superior service some other carriers provide will sway high $$ passengers to make other choices..

Rant over.


Figmo,

You may be on to something here. I have seen more than a few burned out FA's flying consecutive coast to coast turns.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices