Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-16-2012, 10:40 AM
  #118141  
#WEDAT
 
Burn Notice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: 717a
Posts: 286
Default

It is good to see constructive discussion. The important thing you both bring up is contact your reps!! Make sure they know you want compliance.
Burn Notice is offline  
Old 12-16-2012, 11:21 AM
  #118142  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 488
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Your point is valid going forward. By the time the process runs its course the company will have had 4 plus years of non compliance. You can not impose retroactive flying. There has to be a penalty to the company for that time period.


If we can get the new contract rammed through in record time via "constructive engagement," why should it take 4 years to end their contract non-compliance?

Is the "constructive engagement" less of a two-way street than it appears? Only when it suits them?

That being said I agree that compensation for the period of grievance is needed in addition to the ending of the non-compliance/violation. Compensation in exchange for allowing them to continue the violation with our agreement is the no-no.
APCLurker is offline  
Old 12-16-2012, 12:47 PM
  #118143  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: A big one that looks like a little one
Posts: 633
Default

Originally Posted by APCLurker

If we can get the new contract rammed through in record time via "constructive engagement," why should it take 4 years to end their contract non-compliance?

Is the "constructive engagement" less of a two-way street than it appears? Only when it suits them?

That being said I agree that compensation for the period of grievance is needed in addition to the ending of the non-compliance/violation. Compensation in exchange for allowing them to continue the violation with our agreement is the no-no.
Unfortunately the real issue is likely interest and intent. We have enough complicated and technical issues on our plate at any given time, and very few take the Bucking Bar approach and drill down into the codeshare specifics. Should we be mad - well yeah - our share of the flying is not in compliance with the specified levels. Should we be made whole? Absolutely.

But as long as we all jump at the chance to email the government about transferring our Haneda slot, or swapping slots at LGA, but we have no interest in bashing down the company's door over a section 1 violation, then the company has no motivation to do anything differently

ALPA or not - 10,000 angry pilots would make for a productive direct relationship with the company. But since only 100 or so are probably troubled by this issue on a daily basis...

Guess the question is - what is our goal? I'd quote the SPC Chairman but it's probably something along the lines of "continue constructive engagement". That's not planning - that's pandering to the company and the majority of happy pilots at Delta.
SailorJerry is offline  
Old 12-16-2012, 01:46 PM
  #118144  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar

The trend has been for Delta management to violate scope, then negotiate their way out of compliance.

.
But DALPA said "constructive engagement" was "good for us," and DALPA would never mislead us.
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 12-16-2012, 02:33 PM
  #118145  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by FedElta
Hey Clamp,

Just curious...why did you delete my reply to Gunship Guy ??

Regards,
BG
Sorry... slow's post quickly triggered a number of (rightfully) angry replies... your post quoted one of those that quoted his deleted post.

Cleanup when someone says something, um, ill-advised can be a bit of a pain if you can imagine. It would have been more fun had I not happened to have logged in until later in the day!
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 12-16-2012, 02:37 PM
  #118146  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: DAL FO
Posts: 2,165
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
But DALPA said "constructive engagement" was "good for us," and DALPA would never mislead us.
What exactly is your strategy then? I'm all ears. When I hear a better idea backed up by solid reasoning, I will jump behind it 100%.

*Hint - Chronic pessimism and emotional one-liners are not a strategy.
LeineLodge is offline  
Old 12-16-2012, 03:24 PM
  #118147  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge
What exactly is your strategy then? I'm all ears. When I hear a better idea backed up by solid reasoning, I will jump behind it 100%.

*Hint - Chronic pessimism and emotional one-liners are not a strategy.
Please don't quote drank. I am sure I am not alone in that I have him on /ignore, and the only time I have to read his drivel is when he is quoted.
tsquare is offline  
Old 12-16-2012, 03:44 PM
  #118148  
Gets Weekends Off
 
buzzpat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Urban chicken rancher.
Posts: 6,070
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Please don't quote drank. I am sure I am not alone in that I have him on /ignore, and the only time I have to read his drivel is when he is quoted.
^^^^^^^ Don't quote drank. Life is so much better.
buzzpat is offline  
Old 12-16-2012, 03:59 PM
  #118149  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ferd149's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: LAX ERA
Posts: 3,457
Default

Never mind

Last edited by Ferd149; 12-16-2012 at 04:09 PM. Reason: It wasn't that funny
Ferd149 is offline  
Old 12-16-2012, 04:42 PM
  #118150  
Gets Weekends Off
 
capncrunch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,324
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge
What exactly is your strategy then? I'm all ears. When I hear a better idea backed up by solid reasoning, I will jump behind it 100%.

*Hint - Chronic pessimism and emotional one-liners are not a strategy.
Just so we are clear, telling people to "call their reps" is a cop out as well.
capncrunch is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices