Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Runs with scissors
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,738
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Posts: 272
"5 years at DAL, 5% up the list. At this average rate I will be holding A320 captain after 50 years at DAL! Almost guaranteed! Err, wait, the average male life expectancy says I'll be dead by then. I never wanted to use that tiller anyways"
Don't worry you are doing quite a bit better than the 2001 hires. I have moved up 9.44% in the last decade and 1.6% since 2008. The 1999-2001 hire group (Depends on if you were DAL or NW) does not break into the top 50% of the seniority list until 2022 (21-23 years after being hired they can be Jr. narrow body Capt.) So, with only 586 retirements between now and 2017 you should expect continued stagnation. Yes we are getting the 717's, but according to many people we are pretty fat with pilots and most of those position will come out of our current pilot group despite what the company and union led us to believe prior to the PWA being signed and have since backed away from.
But hey what can we say. At least we are not 1999 hires at United, my brother is in that boat.
"I was 10% from the bottom of the list pre SLI, 10% post SLI, and am around 3% better than that now, but way more junior than I was in ATL pre-SLI on a much smaller airplane. Gah![/QUOTE]"
That would be expected when you merge with a company with that has 258 narrow body aircraft and 62 wide body aircraft. Then you shed 24% of those wide body aircraft (62-15 cargo 747)and 20% of the narrow body fleet (68 original DC9's -52). Every body moves down you are fat with pilots, you don't hire for years and pilots move to bases they deem more desirable which in the case of this merger appears to be LAX, ATL and SLC. I would say SEA but since it's not a hub and all
Just to be fair the original Delta pilots did the same thing to the original Western pilot bases. It is what it is.
Don't worry you are doing quite a bit better than the 2001 hires. I have moved up 9.44% in the last decade and 1.6% since 2008. The 1999-2001 hire group (Depends on if you were DAL or NW) does not break into the top 50% of the seniority list until 2022 (21-23 years after being hired they can be Jr. narrow body Capt.) So, with only 586 retirements between now and 2017 you should expect continued stagnation. Yes we are getting the 717's, but according to many people we are pretty fat with pilots and most of those position will come out of our current pilot group despite what the company and union led us to believe prior to the PWA being signed and have since backed away from.
But hey what can we say. At least we are not 1999 hires at United, my brother is in that boat.
"I was 10% from the bottom of the list pre SLI, 10% post SLI, and am around 3% better than that now, but way more junior than I was in ATL pre-SLI on a much smaller airplane. Gah![/QUOTE]"
That would be expected when you merge with a company with that has 258 narrow body aircraft and 62 wide body aircraft. Then you shed 24% of those wide body aircraft (62-15 cargo 747)and 20% of the narrow body fleet (68 original DC9's -52). Every body moves down you are fat with pilots, you don't hire for years and pilots move to bases they deem more desirable which in the case of this merger appears to be LAX, ATL and SLC. I would say SEA but since it's not a hub and all
Just to be fair the original Delta pilots did the same thing to the original Western pilot bases. It is what it is.
"5 years at DAL, 5% up the list. At this average rate I will be holding A320 captain after 50 years at DAL! Almost guaranteed! Err, wait, the average male life expectancy says I'll be dead by then. I never wanted to use that tiller anyways"
Don't worry you are doing quite a bit better than the 2001 hires. I have moved up 9.44% in the last decade and 1.6% since 2008. The 1999-2001 hire group (Depends on if you were DAL or NW) does not break into the top 50% of the seniority list until 2022 (21-23 years after being hired they can be Jr. narrow body Capt.) So, with only 586 retirements between now and 2017 you should expect continued stagnation. Yes we are getting the 717's, but according to many people we are pretty fat with pilots and most of those position will come out of our current pilot group despite what the company and union led us to believe prior to the PWA being signed and have since backed away from.
But hey what can we say. At least we are not 1999 hires at United, my brother is in that boat.
"I was 10% from the bottom of the list pre SLI, 10% post SLI, and am around 3% better than that now, but way more junior than I was in ATL pre-SLI on a much smaller airplane. Gah!
Don't worry you are doing quite a bit better than the 2001 hires. I have moved up 9.44% in the last decade and 1.6% since 2008. The 1999-2001 hire group (Depends on if you were DAL or NW) does not break into the top 50% of the seniority list until 2022 (21-23 years after being hired they can be Jr. narrow body Capt.) So, with only 586 retirements between now and 2017 you should expect continued stagnation. Yes we are getting the 717's, but according to many people we are pretty fat with pilots and most of those position will come out of our current pilot group despite what the company and union led us to believe prior to the PWA being signed and have since backed away from.
But hey what can we say. At least we are not 1999 hires at United, my brother is in that boat.
"I was 10% from the bottom of the list pre SLI, 10% post SLI, and am around 3% better than that now, but way more junior than I was in ATL pre-SLI on a much smaller airplane. Gah!
That would be expected when you merge with a company with that has 258 narrow body aircraft and 62 wide body aircraft. Then you shed 24% of those wide body aircraft (62-15 cargo 747)and 20% of the narrow body fleet (68 original DC9's -52). Every body moves down you are fat with pilots, you don't hire for years and pilots move to bases they deem more desirable which in the case of this merger appears to be LAX, ATL and SLC. I would say SEA but since it's not a hub and all
Just to be fair the original Delta pilots did the same thing to the original Western pilot bases. It is what it is.[/QUOTE]
You just made black Friday, inky black Friday
"
That would be expected when you merge with a company with that has 258 narrow body aircraft and 62 wide body aircraft. Then you shed 24% of those wide body aircraft (62-15 cargo 747)and 20% of the narrow body fleet (68 original DC9's -52). Every body moves down you are fat with pilots, you don't hire for years and pilots move to bases they deem more desirable which in the case of this merger appears to be LAX, ATL and SLC. I would say SEA but since it's not a hub and all
Just to be fair the original Delta pilots did the same thing to the original Western pilot bases. It is what it is.
That would be expected when you merge with a company with that has 258 narrow body aircraft and 62 wide body aircraft. Then you shed 24% of those wide body aircraft (62-15 cargo 747)and 20% of the narrow body fleet (68 original DC9's -52). Every body moves down you are fat with pilots, you don't hire for years and pilots move to bases they deem more desirable which in the case of this merger appears to be LAX, ATL and SLC. I would say SEA but since it's not a hub and all
Just to be fair the original Delta pilots did the same thing to the original Western pilot bases. It is what it is.
Not sure why that post came out weird like that
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
I wish people would learn to use the quote function properly. Good grief.
Sorry. I have a cold so I'm grumpy.
Sorry. I have a cold so I'm grumpy.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
"
That would be expected when you merge with a company with that has 258 narrow body aircraft and 62 wide body aircraft. Then you shed 24% of those wide body aircraft (62-15 cargo 747)and 20% of the narrow body fleet (68 original DC9's -52). Every body moves down you are fat with pilots, you don't hire for years and pilots move to bases they deem more desirable which in the case of this merger appears to be LAX, ATL and SLC. I would say SEA but since it's not a hub and all
Just to be fair the original Delta pilots did the same thing to the original Western pilot bases. It is what it is.
That would be expected when you merge with a company with that has 258 narrow body aircraft and 62 wide body aircraft. Then you shed 24% of those wide body aircraft (62-15 cargo 747)and 20% of the narrow body fleet (68 original DC9's -52). Every body moves down you are fat with pilots, you don't hire for years and pilots move to bases they deem more desirable which in the case of this merger appears to be LAX, ATL and SLC. I would say SEA but since it's not a hub and all
Just to be fair the original Delta pilots did the same thing to the original Western pilot bases. It is what it is.
Delta dramatically increased the flying at the original Western bases. There was no stagnation after the merger. In fact there was extensive growth. Both LAX and SLC saw a huge increase in RSM's and a increase in flights. Both of those former Western Hubs are much larger even today then at the time of the merger.
Having said that I am somewhat amused or bewildered, not sure which about your comments that the original Delta pilots did it to the western pilots. Do you honestly think the pilots control where flights go?????
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Runs with scissors
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,738
"
That would be expected when you merge with a company with that has 258 narrow body aircraft and 62 wide body aircraft. Then you shed 24% of those wide body aircraft (62-15 cargo 747)and 20% of the narrow body fleet (68 original DC9's -52). Every body moves down you are fat with pilots, you don't hire for years and pilots move to bases they deem more desirable which in the case of this merger appears to be LAX, ATL and SLC. I would say SEA but since it's not a hub and all
Just to be fair the original Delta pilots did the same thing to the original Western pilot bases. It is what it is.
That would be expected when you merge with a company with that has 258 narrow body aircraft and 62 wide body aircraft. Then you shed 24% of those wide body aircraft (62-15 cargo 747)and 20% of the narrow body fleet (68 original DC9's -52). Every body moves down you are fat with pilots, you don't hire for years and pilots move to bases they deem more desirable which in the case of this merger appears to be LAX, ATL and SLC. I would say SEA but since it's not a hub and all
Just to be fair the original Delta pilots did the same thing to the original Western pilot bases. It is what it is.
In 1988, I was a BOS based 727 F/E, standing in the SLC pilot lounge, the day the Bid Award was posted, that put 40 767 slots into SLC. As I looked down the list, the top 20 767 possitions were all previous 727 Capts. and the next 20 were all 737 Capts. The Delta pay rate on the 767 was about DOUBLE what the former Western 737 pay rate was.
Yeah, the Western guys REALLY got screwed!
Western was mostly a 737 Airline, They had some 727's too, and 5 DC10's, replaced by Delta's L1011's on the west coast, oh, and then there were all the MD11's Delta put into LAX.
I just hope that some day, before I retire, somebody buys Delta, and Screws me like that!
You can have my date of hire, and my Seniority Number, just double my pay and put me into a brand new wide body, when I'm looking at retiring off a 737....
Last edited by Timbo; 11-23-2012 at 09:27 AM.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Posts: 272
Delta dramatically increased the flying at the original Western bases. There was no stagnation after the merger. In fact there was extensive growth. Both LAX and SLC saw a huge increase in RSM's and a increase in flights. Both of those former Western Hubs are much larger even today then at the time of the merger.
Having said that I am somewhat amused or bewildered, not sure which about your comments that the original Delta pilots did it to the western pilots. Do you honestly think the pilots control where flights go?????
Having said that I am somewhat amused or bewildered, not sure which about your comments that the original Delta pilots did it to the western pilots. Do you honestly think the pilots control where flights go?????
My only personnel Delta experiences are: furlough, merger, capacity reduction, and loss of seniority as pilots exercise there rights to move to bases that were not originally available to them.
However, I would not have been oppossed to huge increases in RSM's and flights following the merger. I just did not know it was actually could happen.
And one final note, all of the former NW Capt's I have flown with are very happy flying out of LAX and SLC. Every one of them saying he was looking at commuting for the rest of his career prior to the merger. I have only flown with one NW Capt based in ATL but he was happy also because be had been commuting from Chattanooga TN to DTW for something like 15 years. So its all good. And truthfully if original Delta guys have flooded into MSP and DTW then disregard everything I have said because with the exception of my personal info I actually have know idea that very well could be the case.
I will be quiet now.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post