Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-06-2012, 09:33 AM
  #114651  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar

Any news on whether they will be ready by their delivery date? Frankly, it is surprising to see Delta and Southwest are playing so nicely in the sandbox. It is out of character for SWA.
SWA is desperate.
tsquare is offline  
Old 11-06-2012, 09:35 AM
  #114652  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Many pilots will recall the often repeated story that mainline can not perform our own feed flying because of all of the other costs other than pilots, which are presumed cheaper if handled by the regional carriers. This post lays out some of the details of the transition to Delta Global Services as Regional Elite employees learn that they no longer have a job.
Just heard from some folks at REAS being transitioned to DGS. Here's the details for their city:

- New ramp employees start at $8.25, above wing start at $9.25.
- Top out is after three years at $0.85 above starting wage.
- All existing employees will be started at DGS at their respective level on the payscale at DGS. So a 3+ year "above wing" employee will be brought down to $10.10. A brand new above wing employee will get a raise from $8.75 (REAS starting wage) to $9.25.
- No vacation or sick time.
- No buddy passes or ZED fares.
- Health insurance to cost about three times as much as Regional's did.

And I'm sure there's more but these are the bullet points that stuck out to me. Everyone thought Regional Elite was pretty bad in employee satisfaction and compensation, but I think DGS takes the cake! Any shred of career employees Regional Elite had left from the days of Comair and Mesaba will hopefully turn down this DGS insult and find new jobs that actually pay liveable wages.
By comparison, the pay rates appear "competitive" with what some Companies renown for customer service pay (like Disney).
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 11-06-2012, 09:42 AM
  #114653  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Too Tall's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Mad Doggy
Posts: 250
Default

I love it when scheduling puts 8 on short call when the target is 4, seem like they are now determined to max every reserve pilots SC for the month.
Too Tall is offline  
Old 11-06-2012, 09:42 AM
  #114654  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Capt
Posts: 2,049
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
And the relevance of this is? We are getting 88 717s for a song... SWA is paying a ton of money to get rid of them.. to bring them up to our standards. Let's say that those 88 717s are costing us... oh.. and I am making this up... 200K/month to lease. How many new 319s do you think we can get for that amount of money? How many jobs will THAT translate into? If/when this group will ever get it's heads out of the sand and realize that management is gonna buy whatever size airplanes THEY see fit to buy, maybe our payscales will be rationalized to fit that a little better.... but I am not holding my breath.
My point was I do not think Allegiant was in the market for the B717. breathe.
boog123 is offline  
Old 11-06-2012, 09:52 AM
  #114655  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by Too Tall
I love it when scheduling puts 8 on short call when the target is 4, seem like they are now determined to max every reserve pilots SC for the month.
The irony for those of us trying to fly, is that we can't Yellow Slip because we are always either already assigned short call, or resting up from doing nothing.







Tried to convince a scheduler that excessive short calls are inefficient ...

Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 11-06-2012, 10:13 AM
  #114656  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by boog123
My point was I do not think Allegiant was in the market for the B717. breathe.
Why not? Delta was picking between the A319 & B717. Why wouldn't Allegiant?
johnso29 is offline  
Old 11-06-2012, 10:31 AM
  #114657  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,607
Default

Originally Posted by Too Tall
I love it when scheduling puts 8 on short call when the target is 4, seem like they are now determined to max every reserve pilots SC for the month.
What category are you speaking about. There are expected to be major weather issues tomorrow with the possible closure of LGA and JFK due to high winds. It would be smart to insure you have a lot of reserves at least in ATL and DTW.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 11-06-2012, 10:45 AM
  #114658  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: B737 CA
Posts: 1,518
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
Spout all the uninformed, inaccurate, and foolish things you want... It does not change the fact that you are NOT a Delta Pilot and you do NOT know "what the membership wants".
What precisely was uniformed, inaccurate, or foolish about what I typed? Point by point, are the CR9/E175 aircraft:
  • Brand-new 76-seat jets - Yes
  • Mainline Comfort - Yes, 3 class including economy comfort, with very comfortable seats, pitch equaling the best mainline domestic, and wifi installed fleet-wide.
  • Mainline Performance - Yes, similar speed, range, and seat-adjusted fuel burn.
  • Mainline Capabilities - Full fuel, pax, and bags on most routes, including such "regional" staples as MSP-YVR and JFK-DFW.
  • Flown on a coast-to-coast network - Yes, including the US & Canada's largest cities in all four corners, I often fly coast-to-coast in a single day. It's a "regional" airplane only if North America is a "region."
  • Will they stick around for 20-25 years? Well, that obviously remains to be seen as was pointed out, but 5 years in they're still quite reliable, far more than when we got them, and DAL obviously likes them enough to give you guys an early contract for 70 more. I'd think they stay around a long time unless you guys outsource 100-120-seaters, you might be able to get them retired early in that case!
So the only other thing I could have typed that was uninformed, innaccurate, or foolish is that not many DAL guys included more outsourced replacement jets in their wish list. You're right, I'm not DAL (just carry your pax)... I only know about a dozen or so DAL pilots and only carry 2 or 3 DAL guys on my jumpseat each week, and DALPA never released the survey results, so I don't know what the pilot group wanted. Perhaps most pilots actually were in lock-step with DALPA and were all for the greater outsourcing of mainline-capable airplanes. I gave the pilot group the benefit of the doubt. Funny to get accused of being too optimistic about the DAL pilot group.

Why don't you go negotiate a solidly improved contract for your own airline before being critical of someone else's collective bargaining agreement...
Actually, our very first contract becomes amendable later this month, so we're in the process of doing just that. Unfortunately it seems that somebody saddled us with mandatory baseball-style arbitration clause...I forget who at the moment...but it almost seems like they didn't want us to negotiate a solidly improved contract. We'll give it the ole college try regardless!

Just in case you forgot: Go back to your own forum and leave Delta pilots to be concerned with Delta Pilot issues.
No, I didn't forget that my presence here drives you (shiznit) crazy, it's just about the only thing keeping me around what with the absence of underboob and all the rumors being depressing ones. But hey, I'll actually agree to leave you to your own forum the minute I stop seeing DAL pilots posting in the CAL/UAL and AA and various regional forums.
JungleBus is offline  
Old 11-06-2012, 10:56 AM
  #114659  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Elliot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: "Prof" button manipulator
Posts: 1,685
Default

Originally Posted by JungleBus
No, I didn't forget that my presence here drives you (shiznit) crazy, it's just about the only thing keeping me around what with the absence of underboob and all the rumors being depressing ones. But hey, I'll actually agree to leave you to your own forum the minute I stop seeing DAL pilots posting in the CAL/UAL and AA and various regional forums.
JB,

Don't worry about $h!tniz's behavior towards poster's he doesn't agree with. He's a company puppet, and chooses to fling insults instead of constructively engaging in the conversation.

Take for example, Purple Drank's posts on the forum, and how everyone attacks him when he posts desire for additional improvements. The L & G about Delta has turned into a swamp of depressing "group think" mentalities, and if you don't agree with the "club", you're obviously either incapable of posting on a "mainline" forum, or "too junior" to realize how difficult all those previously employed by Delta truly had it.

Keep offering the "other side of the fence" Jungle, and hopefully Shiz will go away.

Fly safe,

GJ
Elliot is offline  
Old 11-06-2012, 11:06 AM
  #114660  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,607
Default

Originally Posted by JungleBus
What precisely was uniformed, inaccurate, or foolish about what I typed? Point by point, are the CR9/E175 aircraft:
  • Brand-new 76-seat jets - Yes
  • Mainline Comfort - Yes, 3 class including economy comfort, with very comfortable seats, pitch equaling the best mainline domestic, and wifi installed fleet-wide.
  • Mainline Performance - Yes, similar speed, range, and seat-adjusted fuel burn.
  • Mainline Capabilities - Full fuel, pax, and bags on most routes, including such "regional" staples as MSP-YVR and JFK-DFW.
  • Flown on a coast-to-coast network - Yes, including the US & Canada's largest cities in all four corners, I often fly coast-to-coast in a single day. It's a "regional" airplane only if North America is a "region."
  • Will they stick around for 20-25 years? Well, that obviously remains to be seen as was pointed out, but 5 years in they're still quite reliable, far more than when we got them, and DAL obviously likes them enough to give you guys an early contract for 70 more. I'd think they stay around a long time unless you guys outsource 100-120-seaters, you might be able to get them retired early in that case!
So the only other thing I could have typed that was uninformed, innaccurate, or foolish is that not many DAL guys included more outsourced replacement jets in their wish list. You're right, I'm not DAL (just carry your pax)... I only know about a dozen or so DAL pilots and only carry 2 or 3 DAL guys on my jumpseat each week, and DALPA never released the survey results, so I don't know what the pilot group wanted. Perhaps most pilots actually were in lock-step with DALPA and were all for the greater outsourcing of mainline-capable airplanes. I gave the pilot group the benefit of the doubt. Funny to get accused of being too optimistic about the DAL pilot group.

Actually, our very first contract becomes amendable later this month, so we're in the process of doing just that. Unfortunately it seems that somebody saddled us with mandatory baseball-style arbitration clause...I forget who at the moment...but it almost seems like they didn't want us to negotiate a solidly improved contract. We'll give it the ole college try regardless!

No, I didn't forget that my presence here drives you (shiznit) crazy, it's just about the only thing keeping me around what with the absence of underboob and all the rumors being depressing ones. But hey, I'll actually agree to leave you to your own forum the minute I stop seeing DAL pilots posting in the CAL/UAL and AA and various regional forums.

The total number of 76 seats jets in the category you mentioned was reduced in the new contract not increased as you claim. The company can have more total 70 and 76 seat jets combined but few 76 seat large RJ's then the old contract potentially allowed. The number of allowed 76 seaters did not increase by 70 airframes as you post.
sailingfun is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices