Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2012, 02:46 PM
  #112111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jack Bauer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,357
Default

Originally Posted by dragon
Will do.

I never feel like Delta is doing the "pooping" the sh1t seems to be coming from the people I pay every month. I expect DAL management to do everything in its power to maximize $$ for the shareholders (I still have my shares). I expect my union to maximize our profitability without giving away the farm.

This illustrates the problem with the idea of change from within. The system will go to extraordinary lengths to protect itself.
I agree with everything you wrote here.
Jack Bauer is offline  
Old 10-06-2012, 02:52 PM
  #112112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TANSTAAFL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Still in one
Posts: 784
Default

Originally Posted by 76drvr
I couldn't agree more. It's an easy vote for me. I want an MEC focused on our contract, the other stuff being pandered by some of the candidates was just political fluff.

Why would we want to model our MEC after less effective MEC's? Our MEC is delivering results, improving the pay of the average Delta pilot, capturing more Delta pilot flying inside the Delta system, which increases staffing requirements for the mainline, improving domestic and international code share language, expanded joint venture protections and increasing the size of the Delta mainline fleet to 796 aircraft by the end of 2015. And they did it under-budget.

We don't need lint pickers, or reps with a political ax to grind, we need leadership with it's eye on what's important.
Which less effective MEC's? Never mind the old evil APA. Delivering results that are not reflective of the will of the pilot group flies in the face of a democratic organization. Gerrymandering the vote and process until you get the democratic result you desire is not leadership, nor lint picking. Fascism, communism, and feudalism have all delivered positive results at one point or another as well.
I cannot speak to the current candidates, although joining the winning side and claiming the high road while not living up to previous campaign promises and rhetoric is not a desirable characteristic I want to see in a candidate.

Speaking to the current small field in C20 I have heard there will be some stealth candidates who are either going to write themselves in or have ballot stuffing at the nomination meeting. Kilowatts and Rhythm and Blues. Not what I want to see in a candidate either. If you are running, stand up and have the stones to announce and appeal to the whole LEC on your merits.

Last edited by TANSTAAFL; 10-06-2012 at 03:07 PM.
TANSTAAFL is offline  
Old 10-06-2012, 03:03 PM
  #112113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Go Gators!
newKnow is offline  
Old 10-06-2012, 03:07 PM
  #112114  
Line Holder
 
SFWB's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: Mecca320B
Posts: 94
Default

Go Gators!!!! Chomp Chomp!!!
SFWB is offline  
Old 10-06-2012, 03:11 PM
  #112115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by TANSTAAFL
Which less effective MEC's? Never mind the old evil APA. Delivering results that are not reflective of the will of the pilot group flies in the face of a democratic organization. Gerrymandering the vote and process until you get the democratic result you desire is not leadership, nor lint picking. Fascism, communism, and feudalism have all delivered positive results at one point or another. I cannot speak to the current candidates, although joining the winning side and claiming the high road while not living up to previous campaign promises and rhetoric is not a desirable characteristic I want to see in a candidate.
14-5
94% turnout.
62%-38%
Every single council in favor.

This is gerrymadering? Really? It looks to me like your point of view lost a whole series of democratic elections.

Originally Posted by TANSTAAFL
Speaking to the current small field in C20 I have heard there will be some stealth candidates who are either going to write themselves in or have ballot stuffing at the nomination meeting. Kilowatts and Rhythm and Blues. Not what I want to see in a candidate either. If you are running, stand up and have the stones to announce and appeal to the whole LEC on your merits.
I'd prefer everyone be up front to. Isn't this predicting a repeat of DTW last cycle?

If the result doesn't come out the way you want, will it be gerrymandered?

Last edited by slowplay; 10-06-2012 at 03:28 PM.
slowplay is offline  
Old 10-06-2012, 03:32 PM
  #112116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: A big one that looks like a little one
Posts: 633
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank

...or maybe he planned his future around the concept that his union would look out for his (and not the company's) best interests?

We won't make that mistake again.
Tough to collect a check when you and your union burn your company to the ground. American Airlines was recently ranked the most likely company to not exist at the end of 2013. Why? Because the pilots hated management and they've ruined the brand.
SailorJerry is offline  
Old 10-06-2012, 03:34 PM
  #112117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TANSTAAFL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Still in one
Posts: 784
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
14-5
94% turnout.
62%-38%
Every single council in favor.

This is gerrymadering? Really? It looks to me like your point of view lost a whole series of democratic elections.



I'd prefer everyone be up front to. Isn't this predicting a repeat of DTW last cycle?

If the result doesn't come out the way you want, will it be gerrymandered?
We are never going to agree on this so we may as well give it a breather and agree to disagree. You won this round and can backwards engineer your democratic victory . As to the last DTW cycle I'm confused by your comment. Don't recall any stealth candidates?
TANSTAAFL is offline  
Old 10-06-2012, 03:37 PM
  #112118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: A big one that looks like a little one
Posts: 633
Default

Originally Posted by Jack Bauer

That argument works both ways. The short time from fervent sales pitch and the company securing a huge productivity increase to the current tone/language coming from ALPA/management is instructive. And yet none of the preexisting conditions when the contract was voted on have really changed. Not only that but we spent some future retirements in the process.

It's a sales job that was not honest and no two ways about it is leading to more stagnation for those trapped in the middle and at the bottom................Dude.

Spin away.
So how do you fix the majority of pilots not really caring? I don't care that its instructive. We got sold. So what? What more was there to gain? Unless you're RA or GH you don't make the decisions that drive any pilot hiring, so your theory that preexisting conditions would be honored after the fact is where you may need some instruction.

Doesn't matter what ALPA says, or what the company says. My instruction leads me to believe you would have voted no if we'd been given FDX+5%. Well within your right but its weird that the vocal minority still can't sell their idealism, isn't it?
SailorJerry is offline  
Old 10-06-2012, 03:38 PM
  #112119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TANSTAAFL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Still in one
Posts: 784
Default

Originally Posted by SailorJerry
Tough to collect a check when you and your union burn your company to the ground. American Airlines was recently ranked the most likely company to not exist at the end of 2013. Why? Because the pilots hated management and r they've ruined the brand.
And what about management hating the pilots? Interesting as a union member you, and our MEC regulars seem biased to blame the pilots. There is always more to the story. I'm sure the APA will never want to join ALPA after the trashing they've received from DALPA and Moak, but then we have to have a boogeyman to rationalize our engagement that is too far in the other direction.
TANSTAAFL is offline  
Old 10-06-2012, 03:40 PM
  #112120  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by dragon
Don't try arguing with them. They don't understand why we aren't happy to sit at the bottom of a never moving list and suck hind teat.

They got theirs and don't really care.
That's not really true, but putting the vitriol aside for a moment, what exactly should "we" do about it?
tsquare is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices