Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Exactly. Turkish air offers a great economy comfort class that can rivals our outdated world biz class in the 767. Once they close this route, those DL customers may never return.
Funny how we cut out IST and at the same time United is adding Ewr- IST? I guess we are so good at chasing yield these days.. ahh, bean counters, gotta love'em!
Funny how we cut out IST and at the same time United is adding Ewr- IST? I guess we are so good at chasing yield these days.. ahh, bean counters, gotta love'em!
So.. what makes UAL think they are gonna make boatloads of money going from EWR, when DAL, who had been serving that market for years, perhaps did not? UAL pulled back from their foray into Africa when they found that those markets could not support two carriers. Maybe this will be the same. Turkish flies from JFK to IST. Maybe there is room for one.. and not two. I guess my point is that there is nothing to indicate that the route people at UAL are better rocket surgeons than our guys. We will find out.
Alpha,
I agree with you in many regards even if you are an arrogant p#%k.
The economy has and always will drive this business. No one expected instant hiring. ALPA and the Co, created that expectation and is now backing away from it. The rub is the economy was deliberately down played while all the rosy prognostications were being made. The fact that it is now not so rosy is exactly what many were concerned with which were the lies you had to counter in the hiring T&G?
Rumor is the 717 could be delayed due to AD compliance and SWA having "difficulty" getting parts (?), which is directly tied to hiring, we are now dropping much point to point in Europe in favor of the old NWA/KLM model, which will result in less net traffic for everyone, and again delay hiring (which of course was completely dismissed during the SLI/JCBA discussion)
I have a feeling if the candid conversations about the effect of the economy had gotten as much airtime as it is now, the TA passage might have been more questionable, which is of course why it didn't.
The only lack of critical thinking I see Alpha is an institutional arrogance that thinks they are the only ones with the correct answers. I find it highly ironic you are now defending the TA with many of the same arguements made against the TA at the time. I'm used to TA's falling short, but usually not before much of it is even implemented.
Back to my belly button, and for all our sakes hoping to be proven wrong in the long run.
I agree with you in many regards even if you are an arrogant p#%k.
The economy has and always will drive this business. No one expected instant hiring. ALPA and the Co, created that expectation and is now backing away from it. The rub is the economy was deliberately down played while all the rosy prognostications were being made. The fact that it is now not so rosy is exactly what many were concerned with which were the lies you had to counter in the hiring T&G?
Rumor is the 717 could be delayed due to AD compliance and SWA having "difficulty" getting parts (?), which is directly tied to hiring, we are now dropping much point to point in Europe in favor of the old NWA/KLM model, which will result in less net traffic for everyone, and again delay hiring (which of course was completely dismissed during the SLI/JCBA discussion)
I have a feeling if the candid conversations about the effect of the economy had gotten as much airtime as it is now, the TA passage might have been more questionable, which is of course why it didn't.
The only lack of critical thinking I see Alpha is an institutional arrogance that thinks they are the only ones with the correct answers. I find it highly ironic you are now defending the TA with many of the same arguements made against the TA at the time. I'm used to TA's falling short, but usually not before much of it is even implemented.
Back to my belly button, and for all our sakes hoping to be proven wrong in the long run.
I agree with your premise that Delta is Northwest airlines with a new logo. But, we are more fuel efficient than folks give us credit for. I enjoy MD88 bashing more than anyone; it isn't that bad once you get it up to altitude. The MD90 beats the 737 and A320 on short routes. The 717 is an outlier, but for its mission nothing but a CRj1000 is cheaper.
Of course the 737-900 will improve our numbers at the expense of forgetting the APU every now and then on the after TO check
Of course the 737-900 will improve our numbers at the expense of forgetting the APU every now and then on the after TO check
I don't remember if it was Sailing, Slow, Alpha, TSquare, or Lundberg.
The talking points I remember went something like...
"The TA says the economy can not be used as Force Majeure to avoid the fleets/ratios/commitments"
"Even if the economy slips, at least this TA forces Delta to shrink the Regionals too"
The talking points I remember went something like...
"The TA says the economy can not be used as Force Majeure to avoid the fleets/ratios/commitments"
"Even if the economy slips, at least this TA forces Delta to shrink the Regionals too"
I went back to find some of Lundberg's outrageous claims. Found this instead...
It's Monday.
Hi boys! Herman's wife here... AKA angrypilotwife.com. Bless your heart! While I am all knowing, and all powerful, I have NOT been posting underboob pics for you. Clearly an oversight on my part. Perhaps we can make "Underboob Mondays" a regular addition to AngryPilotWife.com. I'll work on that for ya'll. BTW, some shapes do NOT occur in nature. As for APW, "They are real, and they are spectacular".
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
I tend to think you guys are correct on one point: Europe's woes are being used to mask a pullback that looks to be intentional and planned, where we feed one another's hub, and forgo direct flights. If it were not so, we'd stick with frequency reductions. I just don't get the feeling there is an intention to add direct flights back later, especially not after a US-based STAR or oneworld competitor gets in.
I think this a foolish move a) because it adds connections, b) because competitors are frequently interested in filling the void, and c) some pax have a prference for a carrier from their own country. JFK-CDG-bravethebaggagrhandlerstrikemisconnecttryingtofibd therightterminalcatchanA320sichourslaterandsitnext toasmellyguyinamddleseat-BUD is NOT the same as JFK-BUD.
When furloughed, I sometimes had to buy tickets for employees, for example to Korea from the East Coast. I would get a limousine to JFK, and KAL direct, over a flight via DTW and NRT. My boss once let a travel agent buy such a ticket on NW, and swore he would never do it again, based on the extra connection(s).
Bottom line, every time you add a flight segment, especially on another airline, you increase the chance of an insatisfactory experience exponentially.
This feels like the SECOND time we're going to squander all of the PanAm Atlantic rights we grossly overpaid for.
I think this a foolish move a) because it adds connections, b) because competitors are frequently interested in filling the void, and c) some pax have a prference for a carrier from their own country. JFK-CDG-bravethebaggagrhandlerstrikemisconnecttryingtofibd therightterminalcatchanA320sichourslaterandsitnext toasmellyguyinamddleseat-BUD is NOT the same as JFK-BUD.
When furloughed, I sometimes had to buy tickets for employees, for example to Korea from the East Coast. I would get a limousine to JFK, and KAL direct, over a flight via DTW and NRT. My boss once let a travel agent buy such a ticket on NW, and swore he would never do it again, based on the extra connection(s).
Bottom line, every time you add a flight segment, especially on another airline, you increase the chance of an insatisfactory experience exponentially.
This feels like the SECOND time we're going to squander all of the PanAm Atlantic rights we grossly overpaid for.
Didn't we used to have a "business hub" in the middle of Europe called Frankfurt..........!?!
Denny
Denny
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post