Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,596
While the service may be honorable sometimes the behaviors exhibited aren't, especially toward their civilian employers and co-workers.
We've had a couple of ARTs resign in lieu of firing for being on "MLOA." ART is a full time job that doesn't qualify for MLOA.
We've had several officers on Mil Leave from 2 employers (one of whom required seniority resignation to get a job) try to participate in bankruptcy and merger distributions. I'm not sure if they kept either job...I know they lost the one here. These "events" aren't Delta specific; there were also instances of which I'm personally aware at NWA, FedEx and SWA. I'm sure other employers have similar issues as well.
I'm all for USERRA and support the law and its intent 100%. But it saddens/sickens me when folks abuse the law for personal gain. I believe it was way past time for Delta to set a standard and consistently enforce it for all our military members and for those that are still actively working here. The military guys shouldn't be guessing if they're legal or not, and the rules shouldn't be enforced based on "who they know" for the rest of us that are ensuring they have a job to come back to.
We've had a couple of ARTs resign in lieu of firing for being on "MLOA." ART is a full time job that doesn't qualify for MLOA.
We've had several officers on Mil Leave from 2 employers (one of whom required seniority resignation to get a job) try to participate in bankruptcy and merger distributions. I'm not sure if they kept either job...I know they lost the one here. These "events" aren't Delta specific; there were also instances of which I'm personally aware at NWA, FedEx and SWA. I'm sure other employers have similar issues as well.
I'm all for USERRA and support the law and its intent 100%. But it saddens/sickens me when folks abuse the law for personal gain. I believe it was way past time for Delta to set a standard and consistently enforce it for all our military members and for those that are still actively working here. The military guys shouldn't be guessing if they're legal or not, and the rules shouldn't be enforced based on "who they know" for the rest of us that are ensuring they have a job to come back to.
I stated it was rumor only but it only takes one complaint to force action on the part of the company. Someone could follow up with a lawsuit. You are allowed 5 years of military leave on non exempt orders. Most mil leaves over the last few years have at least some of that time period on exempt orders. Personally I think any set of orders where its not voluntary should be exempt. I know some reservists for instance who were ordered to active duty when the did not want those orders. There is a decent sized group furloughed after 911 who had 10 to 12 years of active service prior. They are mostly now coming back since they have their 20 and the companies new program will have little effect on them unless the company demands orders showing status on their return. Many of these pilots begged to get any job keeping them on active duty rather then come back to Delta. I don't blame them and would have done the same thing. The benefits are enormous. You get a immediate retirement check and you are also made whole on retirement from Delta. Now if your a junior pilot who worked for Delta the last 12 years and finallly about to see some movement and 250 retiring military guys show up ahead of you you might not feel the same.
Mil leave as mentioned in the above post is certainly abused and abused more then many know. I saw it all the time before I retired. A pilot would go into a closed squadron to do a few hours of paperwork on 24 Dec to drop his 4 day trip over Christmas. I know one ER pilot in JFK back when the shortest trip we had was a 3 day who bid lines with 5 day blocks on call and put a Mil Leave day in the middle of every 5 day block. He then GS's like crazy on his scheduled off days. He did that for years. I even know one pilot who got hired while still on active duty then claimed he was recalled and departed after doing 3 weeks of ground school. He was actually on regular leave. He was a smart man who is very well situated today.
I have seen dozens of other mil leave scams. Its kind of sad because it eventually makes it more difficult for those who are serving their country and applying the mil leave rules as intended. Its not a easy life working for Delta and flying for a high tempo reserve squadron. Most of the abusers I saw were in very easy reserve jobs where their participation was when they wanted to schedule a drill and they only worked a few days a month. The guys in squadrons or billets demanding 8 to 10 days a month or more seemed to follow the intent of the rules.
It appears from SD letter that Delta is going to enforce the non exempt ruling only going forward so its really not likely to have much effect. I doubt the circumstances of the last 12 years will ever repeat themselves again and it simply wont be a issue.
YEAH! What he^ said.
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
At the bottom it says "The extra X day is added to the 12.N.2 tables when reserve coverage
is projected to be at least 20%."
Last edited by iaflyer; 09-10-2012 at 07:35 AM.
You aren't getting it and what you quoted leaves our question unanswered. Where does it say if we are at the 20% threshold or wont we know until the final lines are published? We know that 20% reserve means the extra X day, where does it say whether or not we are at the 20% mark?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post