Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-26-2012, 11:35 AM
  #108671  
On Reserve
 
Elvis90's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MSP7ERB
Posts: 1,886
Default

Originally Posted by Elvis90
I do wish we had more than 20 B-2s because it is such a capable weapon system.
You can have more, but what are you willing to give up for them?
Let's see, what can I give up to buy a $1.3 Billion B-2? Hmmm...
Elvis90 is offline  
Old 08-26-2012, 11:40 AM
  #108672  
Looking for a laugh
 
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Default

Originally Posted by Boomer
Looks like Ship 4 got rudder-clipped by Air France in JFK.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Hey, don't knock the Air France pilots. At least they did something concrete about solving the "RJ" problem. However, they were in a codeshare busting plane at the time...
Justdoinmyjob is offline  
Old 08-26-2012, 12:04 PM
  #108673  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BTpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: 777
Posts: 495
Default

Originally Posted by Boomer

Looks like Ship 4 got rudder-clipped by Air France in JFK.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.
What the eff guys!?! I thought only the Air Force had the F-16..? So confused right now, dudes
BTpilot is offline  
Old 08-26-2012, 12:32 PM
  #108674  
Gets Weekends Off
 
nwaf16dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 737A
Posts: 1,890
Default

Originally Posted by Jesse
Still, I have to agree with BB, hindsight being 20/20 I have to believe some major DoD dollars could have been saved had the B-1 gone the way of the planned B-70 with experimentation information from it being used for development purposes instead. But some might counter it helped keep the pressure on the USSR to keep its Tu-160 program going. At least the B-1 can say it had more fight in it than the B-58.
Yeah, but the B-58 was named after a white-trash porno mag, which is awesome
nwaf16dude is offline  
Old 08-26-2012, 12:52 PM
  #108675  
meh
 
Roadkill's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 828
Default

Originally Posted by BTpilot
What the eff guys!?! I thought only the Air Force had the F-16..? So confused right now, dudes
aggressors. They went with something that would automatically instill fear in Naval aviators and bring back memories of always getting their butts kicked.
Roadkill is offline  
Old 08-26-2012, 01:08 PM
  #108676  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 394
Default

Originally Posted by nwaf16dude
Yeah, but the B-58 was named after a white-trash porno mag, which is awesome
Now that is a classic quote!
texavia is offline  
Old 08-26-2012, 01:36 PM
  #108677  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by BTpilot
What the eff guys!?! I thought only the Air Force had the F-16..? So confused right now, dudes
I think a lot of people have F-16s. As to the U.S. Military, I believe if those were U.S. Navy airplanes they'd say The Navy.

So I don't know who those belong to.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 08-26-2012, 01:39 PM
  #108678  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Schwanker
It takes 3 to start
2 to taxi
Leaves 1 to take-off

Although it is pretty cool to see they now do "close air support" with JDAMs from 30,000 ft.
I don't get it. The C-141 only has 2 engines?

forgot to bid is offline  
Old 08-26-2012, 01:44 PM
  #108679  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Really, the best transport of them all is seen here with the C-5,



It's the de Havilland Canada DHC-4 Caribou (designated by the United States military as the CV-2 and later C-7 Caribou). It s a Canadian-designed and produced specialized cargo aircraft with short takeoff and landing (STOL) capability. The Caribou was first flown in 1958 and although mainly retired from military operations, is still in use in small numbers as a rugged "bush" aircraft.

The de Havilland Canada company's third STOL design was a big step up in size compared to its earlier DHC Beaver and DHC Otter, and was the first DHC design powered by two engines. The Caribou, however, was similar in concept in that it was designed as a rugged STOL utility. The Caribou was primarily a military tactical transport that in commercial service found itself a small niche in cargo hauling. The United States Army ordered 173 in 1959 and took delivery in 1961 under the designation AC-1, which was changed to CV-2 Caribou in 1962.

The majority of Caribou production was destined for military operators, but the type's ruggedness and excellent STOL capabilities requiring runway lengths of only 1200 feet (365 metres)[1] also appealed to some commercial users. US certification was awarded on 23 December 1960. Ansett-MAL, which operated a single example in the New Guinea highlands, and AMOCO Ecuador were early customers, as was Air America, (a CIA front in South East Asia during the Vietnam War era for covert operations). Other civil Caribou aircraft entered commercial service after being retired from their military users.

Some are still operated in Papua New Guinea.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 08-26-2012, 01:52 PM
  #108680  
Gets Weekends Off
 
buzzpat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Urban chicken rancher.
Posts: 6,070
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Really, the best transport of them all is seen here with the C-5,



It's the de Havilland Canada DHC-4 Caribou (designated by the United States military as the CV-2 and later C-7 Caribou). It s a Canadian-designed and produced specialized cargo aircraft with short takeoff and landing (STOL) capability. The Caribou was first flown in 1958 and although mainly retired from military operations, is still in use in small numbers as a rugged "bush" aircraft.

The de Havilland Canada company's third STOL design was a big step up in size compared to its earlier DHC Beaver and DHC Otter, and was the first DHC design powered by two engines. The Caribou, however, was similar in concept in that it was designed as a rugged STOL utility. The Caribou was primarily a military tactical transport that in commercial service found itself a small niche in cargo hauling. The United States Army ordered 173 in 1959 and took delivery in 1961 under the designation AC-1, which was changed to CV-2 Caribou in 1962.

The majority of Caribou production was destined for military operators, but the type's ruggedness and excellent STOL capabilities requiring runway lengths of only 1200 feet (365 metres)[1] also appealed to some commercial users. US certification was awarded on 23 December 1960. Ansett-MAL, which operated a single example in the New Guinea highlands, and AMOCO Ecuador were early customers, as was Air America, (a CIA front in South East Asia during the Vietnam War era for covert operations). Other civil Caribou aircraft entered commercial service after being retired from their military users.

Some are still operated in Papua New Guinea.
Dude, that's a C-17.

Last edited by buzzpat; 08-26-2012 at 01:54 PM. Reason: Dang it.
buzzpat is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices