Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-22-2012, 08:29 PM
  #103831  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Originally Posted by DLpilot
The cheaper it is to operate those 76 seaters, the more advantageous to replace mainline flying.
IF the TA goes through, there will be fewer of them allowed than if there is a no vote. A NO vote will ensure 255 of them. Yes, there would be fewer 70 seaters too, but the uneconomical 50s would stick around longer. Maybe you like those 50 seaters?
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Old 06-22-2012, 08:37 PM
  #103832  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 758
Default

Do you not think they would replace a high cost mainline flight with a couple of bottom of the barrel large RJs?
DLpilot is offline  
Old 06-22-2012, 08:40 PM
  #103833  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 758
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
IF the TA goes through, there will be fewer of them allowed than if there is a no vote. A NO vote will ensure 255 of them. Yes, there would be fewer 70 seaters too, but the uneconomical 50s would stick around longer. Maybe you like those 50 seaters?
I would rather deal with uneconomical 50 seaters than premium large RJs that are being operated at bankruptcy rates any day of the week!
DLpilot is offline  
Old 06-22-2012, 08:44 PM
  #103834  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Originally Posted by DLpilot
I would rather deal with uneconomical 50 seaters than premium large RJs that are being operated at bankruptcy rates any day of the week!

You still don't understand. 200 plus 50 seaters are GONE. Then add 70 larger ones. The middle ones, (102 70 seaters) would FILL IN for some of the 200 smaller ones leaving. Then there would still be room for 76 seaters to take some of the 50 seater routes. Then throw in 88 717s. Those would fill in for better performing 76 seat routes. It's a simple concept you are missing.

BTW, here could be a hint from RA himself on Plan B:


Richard Anderson: " if our pilots turn down the agreement. It is premature to get into the specifics of that plan, but our time and the significant value dedicated to this agreement and re-fleeting will have to be rededicated to the alternative plan. Our relationship with ALPA will continue but the near-term opportunities I mentioned above will be lost and we will no longer be under the same time constraints that were necessary to close this deal."


Go ahead, roll the dice.
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Old 06-23-2012, 02:21 AM
  #103835  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
From RA's own keyboard:

Q7. What is the latest with Delta’s fleet strategy? How do we plan to address our future fleet needs?
A. We continue to pursue an opportunistic fleet strategy that features acquisition and deployment of the most efficient aircraft available to meet the needs of our customers. We have employed this strategy to acquire both new and used aircraft to replace mainline (DC9s, older 757s) and regional (50-seat jets, Saab turboprops) aircraft. On the new side, we finalized a deal last summer with Boeing to purchase 100 new 737-900ER jets, which will begin delivery next year. On the used side, we have been buying MD-90s and will have 65 of these flexible, cost-efficient planes in service by the end of next year. You have probably also heard that the recent announcement of Delta’s tentative agreement with our pilots could provide the opportunity to accelerate the fleet strategy with the addition of 88 Boeing 717 aircraft to the mainline fleet, subject to pilot ratification of the agreement.

I'm sure the "cost neutral" (which was never said by management and only said by the C20 rep, btw) guys will now claim what used to be their burning bush is inaccurate...

It's a good strategy for you to continue to imply Captain Tucker is lying. It only makes his council's pilots more resolved to understand that you and alfaromeo have lied consistently from the start. Virtually every word you post is either a flat out lie, or so badly distorted it may as well be a lie. Tom's letter lays that all out very well.

Regardless of how this TA goes, it will be imperative to purge you, alfaromeo, O'Malley and every single person from the MEC administration. You have all failed so badly that I'm embarrassed to be associated with you. You've shamed this pilot group by your behavior and abuse of power.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 06-23-2012, 04:46 AM
  #103836  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TANSTAAFL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Still in one
Posts: 784
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
From RA's own keyboard:

Q7. What is the latest with Delta’s fleet strategy? How do we plan to address our future fleet needs?
A. We continue to pursue an opportunistic fleet strategy that features acquisition and deployment of the most efficient aircraft available to meet the needs of our customers. We have employed this strategy to acquire both new and used aircraft to replace mainline (DC9s, older 757s) and regional (50-seat jets, Saab turboprops) aircraft. On the new side, we finalized a deal last summer with Boeing to purchase 100 new 737-900ER jets, which will begin delivery next year. On the used side, we have been buying MD-90s and will have 65 of these flexible, cost-efficient planes in service by the end of next year. You have probably also heard that the recent announcement of Delta’s tentative agreement with our pilots could provide the opportunity to accelerate the fleet strategy with the addition of 88 Boeing 717 aircraft to the mainline fleet, subject to pilot ratification of the agreement.
Really? What do you expect Richard to say - if we reject the TA we are prepared to sweeten the pot?
TANSTAAFL is offline  
Old 06-23-2012, 05:33 AM
  #103837  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sinca3's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 917
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
You still don't understand.
Bill, it seems it's you that don't understand the other sides point! Have you even tried to see that side and have a constructive argument or debate?
I'm not saying either side is right, but you seem so hard up to prove your point and get Yes votes that you are failing to at least acknowledge the possibility of the con argument.
sinca3 is offline  
Old 06-23-2012, 05:52 AM
  #103838  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: DAL FO
Posts: 134
Default

If you vote yes to this TA you extend the life of DCI. With more large rj's you decrease the delta pilots leverage for future negotiations. Our current language, and current uneconomical 50 seater's are much more powerful than the language proposed.

My personal opinion is that if you think the 717s are tied to this deal you aren't smart enough to cast a vote for this TA.

Guys are posting photos of 717 markings already painted in msp.

Do you think southwest airlines is going to hinge their entire fleet plan on how a bunch of delta pilots vote?

I've personally flown with numerous captains who have had FAA jumpseaters that state flat out that the 717's are a done deal.

How many more clues do you guys need?
fly2002 is offline  
Old 06-23-2012, 06:04 AM
  #103839  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sinca3's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 917
Default

The painted lines for the 717 have been their for years! I wouldn't put too much thought into that....I noticed it first time I flew into MSP over 5 years ago.
sinca3 is offline  
Old 06-23-2012, 06:04 AM
  #103840  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: A big one that looks like a little one
Posts: 633
Default

Originally Posted by fly2002
If you vote yes to this TA you extend the life of DCI. With more large rj's you decrease the delta pilots leverage for future negotiations. Our current language, and current uneconomical 50 seater's are much more powerful than the language proposed.

My personal opinion is that if you think the 717s are tied to this deal you aren't smart enough to cast a vote for this TA.

Guys are posting photos of 717 markings already painted in msp.

Do you think southwest airlines is going to hinge their entire fleet plan on how a bunch of delta pilots vote?

I've personally flown with numerous captains who have had FAA jumpseaters that state flat out that the 717's are a done deal.

How many more clues do you guys need?
So wait a second? Vote no and the multi-billion dollar DCI contract termination costs suddenly just vanish and DCI goes away? You can't just sunset DCI. You can't.

And if the 88 717s are a done deal, would you rather get nothing? Why not take your money?

Fact. If we create a new fleet of SNB aircraft, DCI will shrink by 20% plus (under the TA, and without).

How does that work?
SailorJerry is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices