Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-2012, 11:59 AM
  #101051  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: DL 7ER F/O
Posts: 249
Default

FTB,

You just hit the nail, once these aircraft are here, they are here to stay, remember that their number will NOT be reduced. That one sentence led me to vote NO on our previous agreements, and I think that statement will come back to haunt us with this agreement. I do think once they are here MGT will be back for block hour restriction relief after just a short time.

Keep these jets off property unless WE are at the controls!

Maybe we could get our point across if all the NO voters put their ballots in on the first day the polls open. I have read the agreement and in no way can I vote for this, as DAL has become my hobby job, it quit being a career long ago.
Rudder is offline  
Old 05-24-2012, 12:11 PM
  #101052  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 204
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Yeah really. Let's count the savings.

300 lost pilot jobs forever due to work rules/increased productivity.
An early out that gets rid of top scale pilots and replaces them with year ones.
Savings from smoothing out future training bubbles and less need to hire for that.
Massive savings on accelerated parking of money losing 50 seaters.
Increased revenue on new fleet of 70 extremely cost effective planes at DCI.
Savings of 1/3 pilot profit sharing up to the 2.5B profit level.
Subsidized A/C leases on an already cheap used airframe (717).

And (they would get this anyway, but it still counts against our 3% COLAs):
Likely full inflation rate revenue increases from increased ticket prices.

And possibly:
Less staffing from less sick calls due to intimidation.
New round of DCI cut throat predatory bargaining to get shiny new jets.

Add all that up and then subtract that from the "costing" of this TA and I have a feeling its very, very affordable.
How does this smooth out the retirement bubble? It might make an incentive to retire early for some but they still wouldn't know when guys would pull the trigger in that over 60 zone.
Maddoggin is offline  
Old 05-24-2012, 12:12 PM
  #101053  
Gets Weekends Off
 
944Turbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: M88A MSP
Posts: 117
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Another issue here, and call me cynical, but the block hour ratio seems like a pinky promise for now. Just like the 325 cap and the 255 "final last time this is all we need" cap before it.

Once they acquire the airplanes they can come back and seek relief on the block hour ratio not working and making those planes unprofitable. If we've got a hole in C2012, we might exchange block hour ratio to fix that other hole.

But if they never had the jets in the first place then they never had the jets.

Exactly! Anyone remember C2K and those block hour limits? History repeats itself.
944Turbo is offline  
Old 05-24-2012, 12:15 PM
  #101054  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by Maddoggin
How does this smooth out the retirement bubble? It might make an incentive to retire early for some but they still wouldn't know when guys would pull the trigger in that over 60 zone.
Right now we have almost zero leaving this year and only 80 or 90 next year. Even 2014 I think is only around 150 or so. Very manageable. Its better and cheaper from the company standpoint to try and get some from years beyond that (where the numbers rapidly rise to >300/year all the way to >800/year) to leave in the next 2-3 years. That way they are gone and the big years down the road are flattened out a bit, thus resulting in a smaller training bubble down the road.
gloopy is offline  
Old 05-24-2012, 12:19 PM
  #101055  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: Decoupled
Posts: 922
Default

Originally Posted by Maddoggin
Does this TA fix the reserves not crediting the same amount for the same trip flown by a lineholder. I've been looking for it but can't seem to find it.
No. No change. It sucks for reserves.
orvil is offline  
Old 05-24-2012, 12:19 PM
  #101056  
Gets Weekends Off
 
seamonster's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: ????????????????
Posts: 216
Default

Is the TA on the ALPA website?

Is anyone having trouble logging in to the site?
seamonster is offline  
Old 05-24-2012, 12:21 PM
  #101057  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MrBojangles's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 589
Default

Originally Posted by seamonster
Is the TA on the ALPA website?

Is anyone having trouble logging in to the site?

try doing your password in all caps
MrBojangles is offline  
Old 05-24-2012, 12:23 PM
  #101058  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: Decoupled
Posts: 922
Default

There are all kinds of little things that were not addressed. For instance, the coach DH issue with SIN-NRT. (I think that's the city pair.) I will never fly international again, but I think this should have been changed. It sucks for the guys doing it. I looked for it and couldn't find any change.



That's the new contract. All kinds of holes that didn't get plugged.
orvil is offline  
Old 05-24-2012, 12:24 PM
  #101059  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 478
Default

Thanks to FTB for crystallizing my thought process. We need to change our mindset/negotiating strategy. We HAVE to stop negotiating for the good times and negotiate for the bad. If that entails giving up profit sharing then so be it.

Since deregulation how many concessionary contracts have airlines had? How many positive contracts have we had and what was their time duration?

We don't end up negotiating for the long term good, only for the short term. When things go bad, they have and they will, we end up giving back. We give back hourly rates and when they can't take anymore of our pay, they take our pensions, our work rules and our scope.

They CAN'T take our pensions anymore, they CAN take our scope. By ALLOWING the company MORE large, new, cost efficient RJ's in return for ratios, we are playing Russian roulette. It is ONLY a matter of time before the next economic/company financial downturn.

Force Majeure, they can't reduce OUR block hours AND GIVE them to the regionals if they DON'T have the airframes!!!!!
Rather B Fishin is offline  
Old 05-24-2012, 12:27 PM
  #101060  
Gets Weekends Off
 
seamonster's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: ????????????????
Posts: 216
Default

Originally Posted by orvil
There are all kinds of little things that were not addressed. For instance, the coach DH issue with SIN-NRT. (I think that's the city pair.) I will never fly international again, but I think this should have been changed. It sucks for the guys doing it. I looked for it and couldn't find any change.



That's the new contract. All kinds of holes that didn't get plugged.
So is it coach to NRT?
seamonster is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices