Search

Notices

Commuters & LCR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-04-2024, 05:36 PM
  #121  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,518
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
That has not changed in years. There is a policy to avoid discipline that is contractual. We wanted PS and the company added it via the FOM for a backup flight. They are two different things. I once flew a bunch of trips with a copilot who did about 4 years in the office. He said the pilots who have trouble getting to work were always pretty consistent. It was the same guys over and over outside of severe IROPS.
The addition of the UTC policy was by mutual agreement by the company and the union. It prevented severe disruption caused by "calling in honest." The problem is, the UTC policy does not require 2 hours between flights in order to be given a seat. A CPO adding a time requirement is trying to make things more difficult for people who abide by the FOM. In fact, years ago, the union put out a bulletin explaining that PWA required 2 hours while the FOM UTC did not.
CBreezy is offline  
Old 08-04-2024, 05:47 PM
  #122  
Bent over by buybacks
 
StoneQOLdCrazy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 777
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I once flew a bunch of trips with a copilot who did about 4 years in the office. He said the pilots who have trouble getting to work were always pretty consistent. It was the same guys over and over outside of severe IROPS.
What is your point?
StoneQOLdCrazy is offline  
Old 08-04-2024, 06:08 PM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Posts: 930
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
The addition of the UTC policy was by mutual agreement by the company and the union. It prevented severe disruption caused by "calling in honest." The problem is, the UTC policy does not require 2 hours between flights in order to be given a seat. A CPO adding a time requirement is trying to make things more difficult for people who abide by the FOM. In fact, years ago, the union put out a bulletin explaining that PWA required 2 hours while the FOM UTC did not.
Previously, various CPOs have echoed the union’s guidance as well.

The problem with the FOM policy is that it’s subject to modification and/or revocation by management at any time. Our negotiators have overlooked 23.X during the last few contract cycles, in part because of the perceived benefit of the FOM UTC policy.

It’s time to turn PWA 23.X into something that actually leads the industry.
ancman is offline  
Old 08-04-2024, 06:53 PM
  #124  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,456
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
That has not changed in years. There is a policy to avoid discipline that is contractual. We wanted PS and the company added it via the FOM for a backup flight. They are two different things. I once flew a bunch of trips with a copilot who did about 4 years in the office. He said the pilots who have trouble getting to work were always pretty consistent. It was the same guys over and over outside of severe IROPS.
The point is that this is yet another reinterpretation of know policies and the PWA. I don't commute and don't plan to but if I did I'd be ****ed that this PWA was touted as an improving commutes (Delta PS home if you are extended and miss your commute) and it's done the oposite, eroded cummuter bennefits. "Only following the FOM Unable to Commute policy does not comply with PWA 23.X.3." is not how I understood it or anyone I know who commutes. If UTC doesn't comply with the PWA, why is it a company policy?
notEnuf is offline  
Old 08-04-2024, 08:06 PM
  #125  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,238
Default

This is just another thing in a long line of recent communications and positions that shows how out of touch and antagonistic flight ops management at Delta has become. All the way down to most CPOs now. Terrible leadership.
m3113n1a1 is offline  
Old 08-05-2024, 08:55 AM
  #126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Viper25's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 711
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
This is just another thing in a long line of recent communications and positions that shows how out of touch and antagonistic flight ops management at Delta has become. All the way down to most CPOs now. Terrible leadership.
The sad thing is I believe the VP of flight ops, BS, actually does seem like a good guy who cares. Maybe he’s too removed from these complaints to hear them, but I feel like if he heard it he would potentially try address a few of the items.
Viper25 is offline  
Old 08-05-2024, 01:10 PM
  #127  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Posts: 930
Default

Originally Posted by Viper25
The sad thing is I believe the VP of flight ops, BS, actually does seem like a good guy who cares. Maybe he’s too removed from these complaints to hear them, but I feel like if he heard it he would potentially try address a few of the items.
Everyone says that, and I’d like to give him the benefit of the doubt. But he’s now been in his current role for 6 months. There’s been little change in the behavior of middle management since.
ancman is offline  
Old 08-05-2024, 01:19 PM
  #128  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,639
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
Everyone says that, and I’d like to give him the benefit of the doubt. But he’s now been in his current role for 6 months. There’s been little change in the behavior of middle management since.
agreed. You don’t get that high up in an organization without knowing how to say the right things to the right people.

he comes off as a pilots’s pilot. And he may be, I’d like to think he is. But the actions of some of his subordinates do not indicate a pilot-friendly management tone. And that tone is set from above.
Gone Flying is offline  
Old 08-05-2024, 03:34 PM
  #129  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,456
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
Everyone says that, and I’d like to give him the benefit of the doubt. But he’s now been in his current role for 6 months. There’s been little change in the behavior of middle management since.
We have had some terrible decisions from that level in the last 6 months and several of them were attacks on the PWA, pay, and QOL. Retroactive PR theft being the one I think he would have been happy to turn a blind eye had the pilot group not rioted.
notEnuf is offline  
Old 08-05-2024, 04:29 PM
  #130  
Coverage Award...
 
LumberJack's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 1,363
Default

Originally Posted by Viper25
The sad thing is I believe the VP of flight ops, BS, actually does seem like a good guy who cares. Maybe he’s too removed from these complaints to hear them, but I feel like if he heard it he would potentially try address a few of the items.
I agree, BS is one of the few leaders that know how to win/win.
LumberJack is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ChewTheFat
Delta
31
06-21-2024 06:21 AM
AceyCandler
Major
5
03-02-2017 05:04 AM
jsled
United
12
08-28-2014 08:50 PM
stanherman
Major
10
02-20-2012 05:28 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices