Search

Notices

AMS landing incident

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-22-2024, 08:00 AM
  #21  
Moderator
 
FangsF15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,786
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter
Earplugs or ANC earbuds are good at deadening engine noise. Nothing filters out bumper carts in the 767 aisle and galley. In the 330 bunk, even with earplugs, you can feel the engines spool up for a step climb. Thanks to moving thrust levers, Boeing pilots tend to do better at avoiding throttle bursts in a climb.
FWIW, there is such a thing as an ANC "Sleep Bud" for side sleepers. I can vouch for the Soundcore A10 by Anker. They now have an A20 out, I believe. I was dubious, but you really can lay your ear on the pillow and not feel them, especially so for a rest-break length nap. Pair them to your phone with any white noise app, and it would take dropping a china plate next to a Class II seat to disturb you.
FangsF15 is online now  
Old 07-22-2024, 11:33 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PilotWombat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Position: Currently freeloading
Posts: 548
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
FWIW, there is such a thing as an ANC "Sleep Bud" for side sleepers. I can vouch for the Soundcore A10 by Anker. They now have an A20 out, I believe. I was dubious, but you really can lay your ear on the pillow and not feel them, especially so for a rest-break length nap. Pair them to your phone with any white noise app, and it would take dropping a china plate next to a Class II seat to disturb you.
I use these guys: https://us.loopearplugs.com/products...46599252803817 You can't feel them once they're in and they deaden everything. If for some reason the standard ones aren't enough for you, they make a double plug version. I use them in the bunk and while commuting and can sleep for hours without interruption. I've actually wondered if being so effective is a bad thing, because I wouldn't be able to hear the phone going off if the flight deck was calling for any reason. Luckily the light is pretty bright.
PilotWombat is offline  
Old 07-22-2024, 11:49 PM
  #23  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,211
Default

Originally Posted by Long Haul
But most of the blame, in my opinion, should lay upon the government for not allowing a decent precision approach to runway 24 due to noise abatement reasons, even though very strong southwest winds there are so common.
CA had been there a decent amount and RWY22 has an ILS…..with a GS….that takes you to the TD zone.
Yeah the gusting 40 part sucked and without the gust they would have probably been alright.
Don’t like the situation, go around and ask for the other runway, operational necessity.
They have a convoluted runway decision model over there.

Last edited by TiredSoul; 07-23-2024 at 12:15 AM.
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 07-23-2024, 05:46 AM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 80
Default

Anybody else notice in the final report that the relief pilot became PM for landing and the original PM sat in the jumpseat? Is that a thing on some fleets? In all the 3 pilot operations I've ever done the PM comes back from 3rd break and goes back to their control seat with the relief rotating back to the jumpseat.
Gulfasaurus is offline  
Old 07-23-2024, 07:36 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,568
Default

Originally Posted by Gulfasaurus
Anybody else notice in the final report that the relief pilot became PM for landing and the original PM sat in the jumpseat? Is that a thing on some fleets? In all the 3 pilot operations I've ever done the PM comes back from 3rd break and goes back to their control seat with the relief rotating back to the jumpseat.
I did notice that and the report also mentioned that with him taking the first break he was the least rested.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 07-23-2024, 08:03 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunfighter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,608
Default

Originally Posted by Gulfasaurus
Anybody else notice in the final report that the relief pilot became PM for landing and the original PM sat in the jumpseat? Is that a thing on some fleets? In all the 3 pilot operations I've ever done the PM comes back from 3rd break and goes back to their control seat with the relief rotating back to the jumpseat.
Relief pilot as PM for landing is a holdover from a super premium widebody airline where everybody had a turn in a the seat. In four pilot operations it was common for one pilot to get the takeoff and another to get the landing.

There are FAR 117 guidelines for 3 pilot rest breaks. The landing pilot gets at least 120 consecutive minutes in the last half of the FDP. PM requires 90 minutes, but not specified when. It would make sense that 3rd break is better rested than 1st break upon landing in most circumstances.
Gunfighter is online now  
Old 07-23-2024, 09:10 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Big E 757's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: A320 Left seat
Posts: 2,590
Default

Originally Posted by Gulfasaurus
Anybody else notice in the final report that the relief pilot became PM for landing and the original PM sat in the jumpseat? Is that a thing on some fleets? In all the 3 pilot operations I've ever done the PM comes back from 3rd break and goes back to their control seat with the relief rotating back to the jumpseat.
The only time I witnessed this, the PM on 3rd break either wasn't woken up by the FA's (on the ER with the lie flat rest seat) or he fell back asleep. By the time we got the PM up in the flight deck, we were descending below 180 and the Captain told me to just stay in the seat.
Big E 757 is offline  
Old 07-23-2024, 10:05 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,994
Default

Originally Posted by Gulfasaurus
Anybody else notice in the final report that the relief pilot became PM for landing and the original PM sat in the jumpseat? Is that a thing on some fleets? In all the 3 pilot operations I've ever done the PM comes back from 3rd break and goes back to their control seat with the relief rotating back to the jumpseat.
Sadly, this comes from pilots who say they’re too “groggy” to monitor landing right after they woke up. Or they say 45 minutes isn’t enough time to get up to speed on the arrival plan…even to an airport they have seen dozens of times or perhaps thrice in the current month.

If I’m ever WBA some day, I don’t plan to support this rest plan. A monitoring FO who has been on the flight deck for two continuous rest breaks after what is often an ineffective first break can be nearly useless.
TED74 is offline  
Old 07-23-2024, 07:14 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LloydC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 104
Default

Originally Posted by TED74
If I’m ever WBA some day, I don’t plan to support this rest plan. A monitoring FO who has been on the flight deck for two continuous rest breaks after what is often an ineffective first break can be nearly useless.
A counter point would be that the FO coming back off the 3rd break into the JS has the best view of the operation and is best positioned to monitor/backup both the PF and PM.

The bigger issue in this case was the fact that nobody called for a go around. Two dots low? Keep it coming. Big sinker on short final. Easy with it. Not to mention that sometimes Autothrust isn’t your friend.
LloydC is online now  
Old 07-24-2024, 03:49 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,994
Default

Originally Posted by LloydC
A counter point would be that the FO coming back off the 3rd break into the JS has the best view of the operation and is best positioned to monitor/backup both the PF and PM.
Certainly I want the jumpseater to back us up. And if you’re going to have a tired FO in the right seat he’s gonna need some backup. PMing after an ocean crossing having had first break is the most tired and thousand-yard-stareish I’ve been in 121 ops, even with caffeine.

I dare say if the jumpseat was the best place to put your most rested crewmember we’d probably normalize that and incorporate into FARs. Alas, the PF and PM are the spots we have actual rest requirements defined.
TED74 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FLowpayFO
Regional
26
05-26-2010 08:11 PM
FliFast
Major
9
04-22-2008 03:43 AM
AUS_ATC
Major
7
02-23-2007 05:22 AM
Delta102
Hangar Talk
0
02-22-2007 07:23 PM
Gordon C
JetBlue
5
10-06-2005 03:28 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices