Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
New BOS A330 base coming >

New BOS A330 base coming

Search

Notices

New BOS A330 base coming

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2024, 12:40 PM
  #131  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Big E 757's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: A320 Left seat
Posts: 2,594
Default

Originally Posted by Whoopsmybad
Because DTW couldn’t get a flight out on time or park a plane on time to save their collective a$$es.
Lots of disfunction outside of flight ops there.
Thats too bad. I was based there on the ER years ago and at least back then, the ramp ran great. This was 10 years ago, but I've been in and out of there in the 320 and never had problems. That sucks that it has gotten this bad. If Delta wants to grow it, they'll straighten out the ramp problems I hope.
Big E 757 is offline  
Old 07-11-2024, 01:26 PM
  #132  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2023
Posts: 1,566
Default

Originally Posted by Jaxs170
THe 320 does about 3x the flying as the 73. For AUG here are the approximate monthly departures:

-320: 1200 (to everywhere)

-737: 400 (almost solely FLA and the caribbean)

SEA only has about 750 departures on the 320. This descrepency between BOS and SEA on the 320 has been there for quite a while (and will INCREASE when the NEOs take over BOS-LAX), which is part of the reason us BOStonians can't understand why BS won't open the 320 base (that they were opening in 2020 with only around 800 monthly departures)

Now is when they should get BOS open because of the ATC restrictions limting NYC traffic numbers

But again, I seriously doubt they will do anything until most of the engine issues are in the rear view mirror
Of course it does, we have more 320s/319 than 73s
Hotel Kilo is offline  
Old 07-11-2024, 03:15 PM
  #133  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 2,469
Default

Originally Posted by Big E 757
So, I rode a jumpseat to work a couple weeks ago....about a week before the official announcement and the FO worked in the NYC CPO and I asked about this directly..

He told me network is always reluctant to give more than 6-12 months commitment about fleet plans. And by virtue of this, crew resources is reluctant to commit to new pilot bases. For whatever reason, Network gave Crew resources a 2 or 3 year commitment to Boston A330 fleet plans this time, and we have substantial deliveries on the 330, with what I'm told is another biggish A330-900 order that is inked but still dealing with Rolls Royce on the MRO details so it's not been announced. Lots of planes, lots of new routes and frequencies that haven't been announced, and they need, yes need, to take pressure off the JFK operation so Boston was next best for some of these new routes and frequencies. Hopefully SLC gets some love soon, and DTW too. I think DTW is the biggest head scratcher to me because it's only a 1 hour flight from every northeast city and they have that huge, beautiful terminal and it seems like they have plenty of room to add flights. Hopefully that and SLC next.

Also, someone mentioned TLV out of BOS. They did have that service and it ended with the October 7th attack, and I'm told they don't intend to bring it back. I guess we've got a cushy new codeshare with El Al and they're doing 3-4 flights to JfK a day I think. I just did TLV out of JFK. Layover right on the beach in an awesome location, with great beach bars and restaurants. It was one of the few layovers in my career where I felt like I was almost on vacation. And the Israelies are out and about living their best lives. Truly wonderful to see.
Hiding the good stuff.
PilotBases is offline  
Old 07-11-2024, 05:27 PM
  #134  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 63
Default

I prob missed it but when is this base prob gonna open again? Q1 or Q2 of 2025 or later?
CaptOveur is offline  
Old 07-11-2024, 06:14 PM
  #135  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 56
Default

Originally Posted by PilotBases
Hiding the good stuff.
Remember the A350 order in January? It was for 20 A350-1000 and options for 20 widebody aircraft. I've been told by number of people that those 20 options are A330-900. Here's hoping.
TallWeeds is offline  
Old 07-11-2024, 06:33 PM
  #136  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tinpusher007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 330 B
Posts: 1,629
Default

Originally Posted by TallWeeds
Remember the A350 order in January? It was for 20 A350-1000 and options for 20 widebody aircraft. I've been told by number of people that those 20 options are A330-900. Here's hoping.
Most likely; DL can't resist a cheap airplane that no one else wants.
Tinpusher007 is offline  
Old 07-11-2024, 07:00 PM
  #137  
Moderator
 
FangsF15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,986
Default

Originally Posted by TallWeeds
Remember the A350 order in January? It was for 20 A350-1000 and options for 20 widebody aircraft. I've been told by number of people that those 20 options are A330-900. Here's hoping.
Sure enough, you are absolutely right. Just went and reread the press release. Not sure how I missed the 20 options weren’t specifically 35K’s.
FangsF15 is offline  
Old 07-11-2024, 07:05 PM
  #138  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Position: 737 A
Posts: 1,070
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
Sure enough, you are absolutely right. Just went and reread the press release. Not sure how I missed the 20 options weren’t specifically 35K’s.
I had to go back and look too. I think it was reported with different verbiage “20 350-1000 and 20 options.” I like many assumed that meant all -1000. Guess not, they all pay the same so no difference in my eyes.
Vsop is offline  
Old 07-11-2024, 08:16 PM
  #139  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,681
Default

Originally Posted by TallWeeds
Remember the A350 order in January? It was for 20 A350-1000 and options for 20 widebody aircraft. I've been told by number of people that those 20 options are A330-900. Here's hoping.
is the 339 still having PO issues on what should be reasonable flights?
Gone Flying is offline  
Old 07-12-2024, 06:47 AM
  #140  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tinpusher007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 330 B
Posts: 1,629
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
is the 339 still having PO issues on what should be reasonable flights?
We now have some relief with regard to different bleed configurations for takeoff but the crosswind procedure that sometimes needs to be used comes with a significant payload hit because of the extra runway it eats up. Hopefully the company takes note and options more A359s instead of 339s.
Tinpusher007 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Herc130AV8R
American
19
09-19-2019 08:23 PM
Olario
Delta
80
08-25-2019 07:17 PM
rabsing76
Mesa Airlines
232
10-20-2017 09:59 AM
buffalopilot
Regional
18
05-03-2007 10:06 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices