C44 Recall
06-25-2024, 05:09 PM
#461
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Position: 7ERA
Posts: 950
I heard that TK has council bypassed to 44. The allegation was that he was the man behind the curtain for the individual who has initiated the 44 recalls. Supposedly, that individual has only been here a little over a year and has no prior union experience (prior mil), but is initiating a recall, which is a little odd on the surface. Not sure if TK wants to run for 44 rep or if he would be setting the stage for placing people who would vote for him in the MC election this time around. Has anyone else heard any of this? I don't know if there is any truth to it or not, as I have no history with the person I heard it from to know the level to which I can count on the accuracy of the statement.
06-26-2024, 04:27 AM
#462
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,518
I heard that TK has council bypassed to 44. The allegation was that he was the man behind the curtain for the individual who has initiated the 44 recalls. Supposedly, that individual has only been here a little over a year and has no prior union experience (prior mil), but is initiating a recall, which is a little odd on the surface. Not sure if TK wants to run for 44 rep or if he would be setting the stage for placing people who would vote for him in the MC election this time around. Has anyone else heard any of this? I don't know if there is any truth to it or not, as I have no history with the person I heard it from to know the level to which I can count on the accuracy of the statement.
And no. He's not behind it. There are A LOT of people who that worked with DA who want to see him go.
06-26-2024, 07:14 AM
#463
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Position: 7ERA
Posts: 950
Being here a year has nothing to do with having no union experience. Some guys come here as former reps or even MEC chairman. Even if he was prior mil, he probably has friends that were not. And military guys are often much more skeptical of unions and can see fraudulent and self serving behavior before civilians do
And no. He's not behind it. There are A LOT of people who that worked with DA who want to see him go.
And no. He's not behind it. There are A LOT of people who that worked with DA who want to see him go.
06-28-2024, 10:19 AM
#464
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2014
Posts: 133
Being here a year has nothing to do with having no union experience. Some guys come here as former reps or even MEC chairman. Even if he was prior mil, he probably has friends that were not. And military guys are often much more skeptical of unions and can see fraudulent and self serving behavior before civilians do
And no. He's not behind it. There are A LOT of people who that worked with DA who want to see him go.
And no. He's not behind it. There are A LOT of people who that worked with DA who want to see him go.
06-28-2024, 10:29 AM
#465
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,518
06-28-2024, 10:53 AM
#466
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,341
06-28-2024, 11:09 AM
#467
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2014
Posts: 133
So he has "friends" that inform him of all the union politics and procedures so he can lead all the rest of us out of darkness, but they are unwilling to file themselves, and whoever these theoretical "friends" you propose are, TK is definitely not among them. And when you say "filed it himself," you mean he filed it with help from DA since his "friends" apparently did not instruct him on how to properly file a resolution, maybe because they don't know, whoever they are. Maybe they're not even in C44 like most of the naysayers posting in here.
06-28-2024, 11:12 AM
#468
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,518
So he has "friends" that inform him of all the union politics and procedures so he can lead all the rest of us out of darkness, but they are unwilling to file themselves, and whoever these theoretical "friends" you propose are, TK is definitely not among them. And when you say "filed it himself," you mean he filed it with help from DA since his "friends" apparently did not instruct him on how to properly file a resolution, maybe because they don't know, whoever they are. Maybe they're not even in C44 like most of the naysayers posting in here.
06-28-2024, 11:47 AM
#469
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,997
What are you blabbering about? You mean filing a resolution that wasn't required but c44 lied to national that it was? So he's working with TK but he's also not working with TK? Why are we talking about friends or not friends? Maybe he just doesn't like what he sees? It couldn't possibly be that. It MUST be a grand conspiracy
06-28-2024, 11:59 AM
#470
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,518
ALPA National told him he was wrong. He lied to ALPA national and said this is how it has always been done. ALPA National said if it's always been required, it's probably okay to require it but it can be ruled on by the executive board. That would result in a delay of the recall
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
