Search

Notices

C44 Recall

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-13-2024, 08:52 AM
  #331  
Roll’n Thunder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Pilot
Posts: 3,837
Default

Another ALPA give away. Now REG pilots can be rerouted prior to first airborne departure. Instead of getting assignment pay if that happened in the past now we will only get 50/100% of the changed first leg.
tennisguru is offline  
Old 06-13-2024, 11:14 AM
  #332  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Posts: 930
Default

Originally Posted by tennisguru
Another ALPA give away. Now REG pilots can be rerouted prior to first airborne departure. Instead of getting assignment pay if that happened in the past now we will only get 50/100% of the changed first leg.
And these guys wonder why there’s a rush to recall them before the election..
ancman is offline  
Old 06-13-2024, 11:20 AM
  #333  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Valar Morghulis's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 321
Default

Originally Posted by tennisguru
Another ALPA give away. Now REG pilots can be rerouted prior to first airborne departure. Instead of getting assignment pay if that happened in the past now we will only get 50/100% of the changed first leg.
Not 100% accurate. It can only be 1 leg, DH to flying or vice versa on the same flight, and DH to flying is by proffer only. Pays reroute pay and counts as a trigger for further RR pay (%150 to %200)

Any other change is still not allowed, and if violated pays assignment pay.

In exchange, after departure on the first leg, all DH to flying or vice versas on the same flight count as reroutes, so anyone who’s had that happen and has it in “impasse” needs to send a report, if you haven’t already, and make sure you get paid.

Valar Morghulis is offline  
Old 06-13-2024, 11:26 AM
  #334  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Posts: 930
Default

Originally Posted by Valar Morghulis
Not 100% accurate. It can only be 1 leg, DH to flying or vice versa on the same flight, and DH to flying is by proffer only. Pays reroute pay and counts as a trigger for further RR pay (%150 to %200)

Any other change is still not allowed, and if violated pays assignment pay.

In exchange, after departure on the first leg, all DH to flying or vice versas on the same flight count as reroutes, so anyone who’s had that happen and has it in “impasse” needs to send a report, if you haven’t already, and make sure you get paid.
Yes, and that was previously called an illegal reroute prior to departure of the first leg. The penalty for that required removing the entire rotation from the pilot’s schedule, with pay, or paying assignment pay (TRIPLE pay for the entire rotation).

This MEC once again further devalued our PWA and cost us negotiating capital. They’ve become a complete liability, necessitating prompt removal from office.
ancman is offline  
Old 06-13-2024, 11:36 AM
  #335  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Valar Morghulis's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 321
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
Yes, and that was previously called an illegal reroute before departure of the first leg. The penalty for that required removing the entire rotation from the pilot’s schedule, with pay, or paying assignment pay (TRIPLE pay for the entire rotation).

This MEC once again further devalued our PWA and cost us negotiating capital. They’ve become a complete liability to our PWA, necessitating prompt removal from office.
But in the above cases pilots weren’t getting that, or even paid reroute pay. They got zero because the company said “nope, flying to DH on the same flying isn’t a reroute” and not just prior to 1st departure, not at anytime.

A quick read of the FB page seem to show is that everyone in this situation was at an impasse with their scheduling disputes, and not being paid anything for any of this, and now they will be.
Valar Morghulis is offline  
Old 06-13-2024, 11:37 AM
  #336  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,238
Default

Originally Posted by Valar Morghulis
But in the above cases pilots weren’t getting that, or even paid reroute pay. They got zero because the company said “nope, flying to DH on the same flying isn’t a reroute” and not just prior to 1st departure, not at anytime.

A quick read of the FB page seem to show is that everyone in this situation was at an impasse with their scheduling disputes, and not being paid anything for any of this, and now they will be.
Yeah, so the company's tactic of just saying "no, give us a better deal" worked once again. Pathetic.
m3113n1a1 is offline  
Old 06-13-2024, 11:47 AM
  #337  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Posts: 930
Default

Originally Posted by Valar Morghulis
But in the above cases pilots weren’t getting that, or even paid reroute pay. They got zero because the company said “nope, flying to DH on the same flying isn’t a reroute” and not just prior to 1st departure, not at anytime.

A quick read of the FB page seem to show is that everyone in this situation was at an impasse with their scheduling disputes, and not being paid anything for any of this, and now they will be.
The company HAS, in the past, paid assignment pay for these (ask me how I know). Since you mention the FB page, I assume you’ve read SK’s thoughts on it as well.

This settlement pays affected pilots pennies on the dollar. It is very close to the worst case scenario that an arbitrator could impose. The MEC’s running motto appears to be “We’re always going to lose in arbitration, so let’s just preemptively forfeit every time.”

Management is now choosing which section of the PWA to chip away from next.
ancman is offline  
Old 06-13-2024, 12:58 PM
  #338  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2023
Posts: 1,521
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
Yes, and that was previously called an illegal reroute prior to departure of the first leg. The penalty for that required removing the entire rotation from the pilot’s schedule, with pay, or paying assignment pay (TRIPLE pay for the entire rotation).

This MEC once again further devalued our PWA and cost us negotiating capital. They’ve become a complete liability, necessitating prompt removal from office.
Originally Posted by ancman
The company HAS, in the past, paid assignment pay for these (ask me how I know). Since you mention the FB page, I assume you’ve read SK’s thoughts on it as well.

This settlement pays affected pilots pennies on the dollar. It is very close to the worst case scenario that an arbitrator could impose. The MEC’s running motto appears to be “We’re always going to lose in arbitration, so let’s just preemptively forfeit every time.”

Management is now choosing which section of the PWA to chip away from next.
All true. Its far past tme for DH and the rest to be removed. Yet another capitulation to appease the company and/or the phantom arbitrator. Once again the crowd in PTC has shown they are willing to roll over and play nice when in fact they should be building fortifications and trebuchets. (who wants to bet DH et al get rolled into some cushy management job after they are no longer in office).

Also, many here are not on the book of faces, can one of you post up what's going on there? Seems many of us who do not partake of the social medias are in the dark here about some of this. I did read the MOU. But it seems some other back channel stuff was going on to get to that point.
Hotel Kilo is offline  
Old 06-13-2024, 02:33 PM
  #339  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 180
Default

Originally Posted by CRJphlyer
Didn’t all of the reps support getting rid of ACE?
…Bueller… Does anyone know?
CRJphlyer is offline  
Old 06-13-2024, 02:55 PM
  #340  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: B737 FO
Posts: 709
Default

Originally Posted by Valar Morghulis
But in the above cases pilots weren’t getting that, or even paid reroute pay. They got zero because the company said “nope, flying to DH on the same flying isn’t a reroute” and not just prior to 1st departure, not at anytime.

A quick read of the FB page seem to show is that everyone in this situation was at an impasse with their scheduling disputes, and not being paid anything for any of this, and now they will be.
This hasn't happened to me, but if it had I wouldn't want DALPA to just fold on a major provision of reroutes so I would get paid a fraction of what should be paid. I'd rather not get paid at all and have it go to arbitration than see this happen. Talk about rewarding bad behavior!
BlueSkies is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Boeing Aviator
=> United Contract 2022
5
08-18-2022 09:15 AM
AlettaOcean
United
204
07-22-2022 09:02 AM
orvil
Delta
27
02-03-2017 03:03 PM
gzsg
Delta
2
11-02-2015 12:36 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices