Search

Notices

67 is dead,

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-2024, 07:50 AM
  #621  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 7,014
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter
Who?

.

Well played Sir!
Scoop is offline  
Old 05-08-2024, 08:31 AM
  #622  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Posts: 248
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter
Who?

.
I really wanna know!
Lifeson2112 is offline  
Old 05-08-2024, 08:40 AM
  #623  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 903
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter
/S/ If you work til 65 you need to fund 17 years of retirement. If you work til 67, you only need to fund 15. That's a 12% reduction in retirement years. The benefit is even bigger than 12%, because you are eliminating the two healthiest, most active, able bodied years of your retirement. /S/

I'm resisting the siren song of correcting math errors on the internet. Can we just accept the financial calculations as proof of cognative decline and move on?
If someone else doesn't get in the white house the retirements might not be worth spit and we will all hope they push retirement to 71 💀
overqualified52 is offline  
Old 05-08-2024, 09:47 AM
  #624  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 919
Default

Originally Posted by overqualified52
If someone else doesn't get in the white house the retirements might not be worth spit and we will all hope they push retirement to 71 💀
huh? In what reality is the “other guy” (regardless of who it is) going to solve retirement or inflation issues?
Extenda is online now  
Old 05-08-2024, 12:09 PM
  #625  
Can’t find crew pickup
 
Joined APC: Jun 2021
Posts: 2,300
Default

Originally Posted by Extenda
huh? In what reality is the “other guy” (regardless of who it is) going to solve retirement or inflation issues?
Maybe one side prints less than the other? But they both like to just print more cash. Then we end up like this.
Whoopsmybad is offline  
Old 05-08-2024, 12:49 PM
  #626  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunfighter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,666
Default

Originally Posted by Extenda
huh? In what reality is the “other guy” (regardless of who it is) going to solve retirement or inflation issues?
Inflation is a design feature of the central banking system. Invest in some income producing real estate with long term fixed rate debt and let the Fed printing press do the heavy lifting.
Gunfighter is offline  
Old 05-08-2024, 02:04 PM
  #627  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2022
Posts: 339
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
Yep. I'm actually against raising the age, as it is amusing to see how guys only "see the light" about the unfairness of Age 65 only when they themselves are approaching retirement (but it wasn't "unfair" a decade earlier).

That said, the math is pretty easy. Age 66. Senior WB captain. If you are flying, you can make $500K without too much effort, and you get 17% (or higher) to add on to the significant retirement accounts that you should have accrued over a career. You are not only not tapping into any savings at all, retirement or not, but you still are adding to them, and probably in a significant manner (house is likely paid for by now, kids are likely on their own, etc). Or, you could be enjoying retirement, but the spigot of impressive income and company-provided contributions to retirement have gone to zero. That's not bad at all--enjoy retirement that you have earned! But the math is real, and math doesn't have agendas--only numbers.
The math just does not equal anywhere close to $2m though. I'm not saying I agree or disagree with 67, just that you can't count $1m in income and also count another million because you didn't pay expenses out of your 401k like the retired guy did. Its like $1.2-1.5m extra, maybe.
Puddytatt is offline  
Old 05-08-2024, 03:38 PM
  #628  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jughead135's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Hates Commuting
Posts: 973
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter
Who?

.

Filler

Jughead135 is offline  
Old 05-08-2024, 04:21 PM
  #629  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 1,466
Default

Originally Posted by Jughead135
Filler

wake up to find out that you are the eyes of the world…….
Hubcapped is offline  
Old 05-08-2024, 04:38 PM
  #630  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,005
Default

Originally Posted by Puddytatt
The math just does not equal anywhere close to $2m though. I'm not saying I agree or disagree with 67, just that you can't count $1m in income and also count another million because you didn't pay expenses out of your 401k like the retired guy did. Its like $1.2-1.5m extra, maybe.
Another way to look at it: you invest that $1M you didn’t spend from 65 to 67 and in 12 years at age 79 you have $2M more in the bank than you would if you retired at 65 (6% interest). And I disagree with 67.
interceptorpilo is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sellener
Flight Schools and Training
10
09-10-2009 07:29 AM
usmc-sgt
Hangar Talk
11
08-28-2008 08:33 AM
multipilot
Hangar Talk
1
07-31-2008 04:53 PM
FlyerJosh
Hangar Talk
14
03-28-2008 08:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices