Search

Notices

67 is dead,

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2024, 06:20 AM
  #371  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,689
Default

Originally Posted by Stan446
So...is 67 dead or guys just have no meaning to their lives and want to complain forever.
I think it's dead. The airlines jumped in with the reality of what it would do to scheduling among other issues.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 02-24-2024, 07:02 AM
  #372  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,049
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
Cmon Bar - How about a little balance in your recollection. How would you refer to the 1000+ furloughed DAL Pilots who Comair would give preferential hiring to only if they resigned their Delta seniority number? Hardly seems very family like.

Scoop
I would say their own MEC sold them down the river for $660,000,000.00 (per the bankruptcy transcript) I will tell you the exact same thing I told JC Lawson:

Who do the Delta pilots work for?

Delta

Who does the Delta MEC negotiate with?

Delta

Who owns Comair?

Delta

JC Lawson's stupid letter was absolutely meaningless. It provided political cover for those who wanted to sell out the junior Delta pilots. Our Delta MEC Chair could have picked up the phone to Delta Air Lines and Delta would have been happy to have qualified pilots doing the back-fill flying that the Delta MEC had permitted. Instead of helping the junior Delta pilots, the MEC used the opportunity to negotiate.

As the then MEC Chair told me "scope just gets you to the table."

How do I know this? How do I know that a single call would have opened the door? Because it did at ASA (it was the ASA pilots that made that call).

ASA was happy to hire Delta pilots in Atlanta and a little more than a dozen actually came over. ASA greeted those pilots with open arms and to their great credit, the Delta pilots who flew for ASA did a great job with a terrific attitude. When Delta resumed hiring in 2007 a large percent of those intitial Delta hires were people who made connections with Delta pilots.

End result: ASA pilots got hired. JC Lawson's own son lost his job when Comair shuttered.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 02-24-2024, 07:05 AM
  #373  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 121
Default

Originally Posted by Stan446
So...is 67 dead or guys just have no meaning to their lives and want to complain forever.
It's not dead, dead. It isn't well, though.

It still has to be passed by the full Senate and then both versions have to be negotiated in conference with the House.
Hoosier Daddy is offline  
Old 02-24-2024, 07:07 AM
  #374  
Bent over by buybacks
 
StoneQOLdCrazy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 829
Default

Originally Posted by 180ToAJ
Age 67 would be a large costs increase to LTD, correct? Nobody has denied that...

It won’t be impacted in the near future, but don’t you think the company would want to reduce costs?
It would absolutely have a profound impact on younger pilots. The increased premiums Delta will pay due to raising the age will need to be addressed somewhere, and it will greatly affect the next contract negotiation.

In the meantime, Delta would cut where it could. I be they could save a few hundred thousand dollars a month if they started putting us in ****ty hotels. No more hiltons or marriotts. That's the first thing they'd do. And save money by clamping down on sick calls, and doubling down on improperly paying us, with their "IT" problems.
StoneQOLdCrazy is offline  
Old 02-24-2024, 07:13 AM
  #375  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,049
Default

Age 67 will probably happen eventually, but not now.

The best case is a study and coordination with ICAO to minimize disruption.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 02-24-2024, 07:28 AM
  #376  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: LAX ER
Posts: 1,606
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Age 67 will probably happen eventually, but not now.

The best case is a study and coordination with ICAO to minimize disruption.
By the time all of that occurs what would be the point

I’m sure 2 man augmented crews is going to happen faster.
tcco94 is offline  
Old 02-24-2024, 08:31 AM
  #377  
Moderator
 
FangsF15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,971
Default

Originally Posted by 180ToAJ
Age 67 would be a large costs increase to LTD, correct? Nobody has denied that.

It won’t be impacted in the near future, but don’t you think the company would want to reduce costs?
I know we would have to vote for it, but haven’t we voted in concessions in the past?
Pension loss, PS reduction, etc.
Why did we vote for those? Could it happen again?

Most pilots do not want 67. Most pilots really like LTD the way it is. An increase to 67 can put LTD at risk. Not now, but who knows what will happen over the next 20 years?
We have no control over the retirement age, but selling it as a win, especially for LTD, is glib.
This is really the only part of your argument I am taking issue. You seem to have a presupposition that concessions are somehow inevitable if 67 passes. I just don't see how the company can turn that around on us. I mean, ALPA was fighting hard against it, just like the company was (albeit behind the scenes). In fact, if anything, I think ALPA will have the upper hand, especially if ICAO does not go first.

In the big scheme of things, it's just another 'cost of doing business' the company will have to absorb. Again, I'm not say there are zero repercussions (like increased scrutiny by Harvey-Watt, or reduction in topline negotiating room, or similar).

Certainly for those who have legitimately lost their medical, how can you say that 67 is not a win? And for everyone else who is worried about a condition rearing its ugly head someday (like me, who has been on LTD 2x already), it is absolutely in the "pro" column. I get that you disagree, and see it as a con, actually. We can agree to disagree.
FangsF15 is offline  
Old 02-24-2024, 08:32 AM
  #378  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,049
Default

Originally Posted by tcco94
By the time all of that occurs what would be the point

I’m sure 2 man augmented crews is going to happen faster.
Is this to improve the profession, the industry, or just a couple of pilots who want an extra million?

That is where the lobbying and lawsuits have pushed back a lot of people who might be supporters. If you want ALPA on your side, you got to get the votes.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 02-24-2024, 10:19 AM
  #379  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Capt
Posts: 2,049
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Is this to improve the profession, the industry, or just a couple of pilots who want an extra million?

That is where the lobbying and lawsuits have pushed back a lot of people who might be supporters. If you want ALPA on your side, you got to get the votes.
Guaranteed if 67 passes, you’re here at 65 and a day. guaranteed
boog123 is offline  
Old 02-24-2024, 10:54 AM
  #380  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,689
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
I would say their own MEC sold them down the river for $660,000,000.00 (per the bankruptcy transcript) I will tell you the exact same thing I told JC Lawson:

Who do the Delta pilots work for?

Delta

Who does the Delta MEC negotiate with?

Delta

Who owns Comair?

Delta

JC Lawson's stupid letter was absolutely meaningless. It provided political cover for those who wanted to sell out the junior Delta pilots. Our Delta MEC Chair could have picked up the phone to Delta Air Lines and Delta would have been happy to have qualified pilots doing the back-fill flying that the Delta MEC had permitted. Instead of helping the junior Delta pilots, the MEC used the opportunity to negotiate.

As the then MEC Chair told me "scope just gets you to the table."

How do I know this? How do I know that a single call would have opened the door? Because it did at ASA (it was the ASA pilots that made that call).

ASA was happy to hire Delta pilots in Atlanta and a little more than a dozen actually came over. ASA greeted those pilots with open arms and to their great credit, the Delta pilots who flew for ASA did a great job with a terrific attitude. When Delta resumed hiring in 2007 a large percent of those intitial Delta hires were people who made connections with Delta pilots.

End result: ASA pilots got hired. JC Lawson's own son lost his job when Comair shuttered.
I know you keep discounting it but I was at the meeting where the Comair MEC said that they were going to try and force a merger and if so would invoke ALPA merger policy and push for a DOH integration. That was the end of support for them.
sailingfun is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sellener
Flight Schools and Training
10
09-10-2009 07:29 AM
usmc-sgt
Hangar Talk
11
08-28-2008 08:33 AM
multipilot
Hangar Talk
1
07-31-2008 04:53 PM
FlyerJosh
Hangar Talk
14
03-28-2008 08:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices