Search

Notices

23.M.7 Updated

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-27-2023, 06:43 AM
  #61  
seeing the large hubs...
 
iaflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 73N A
Posts: 3,748
Default

Originally Posted by Airfix
If you auto acknowledge a trip can you then not accept the trip once it is awarded to you?
Yes - remember it's a two step process.

Trip goes out - the system auto Acknowledges it for you. The next step is Auto Award - you don't have to select this option (which is on the left in the iCrew screen).

What will happen is that you won't get any call when it Auto Acknowledges it, but you will get the Award call. Just ignore it or decline in the app.

Problem is - CS sometimes jumps the gun and puts it on your schedule. I've had that happen a few times - eventually they call, or they figure it out. Once I called after two hours to tell them I wasn't doing the trip, because I didn't accept the Award. No biggie, they just removed the trip from my line.
iaflyer is offline  
Old 06-27-2023, 06:44 AM
  #62  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by Jaww
Maybe to put it behind us. Like pardoning Nixon. Time to move on.
Nixon resigned his seat.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 06-27-2023, 06:46 AM
  #63  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
Let's say we filed a grievance we knew we were going to lose. A grievance the company knew we were going to lose. How else do you stop the IA nonsense without giving up batch sizes, at least to an extent? And what if the company says "we'll stop doing it if you give up batch sizes." And when we say no, they say, "okay, we will just 23,M.7 even more. Thanks for playing.

*Devil's Advocate.
Lets say every scheduling committee chairman, every negotiator and MEC Chair (including ALPA's President) all testified to the contrary.

Who was it that wanted ARCOS to begin with?

Maybe it wasn't our job to fix something we never wanted.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 06-27-2023, 06:54 AM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,518
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Lets say every scheduling committee chairman, every negotiator and MEC Chair (including ALPA's President) all testified to the contrary.

Who was it that wanted ARCOS to begin with?

Maybe it wasn't our job to fix something we never wanted.
What did our negotiators and MEC "testify" to during the RJ/flow down grievance? How did that work out?
CBreezy is offline  
Old 06-27-2023, 06:55 AM
  #65  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy
Policy manual already states that any proposed grievance settlement must be presented to the MEC prior to signing for at least 96 hours, and may be rejected if a majority of the MEC so wills.

If the grievance settlement was signed, that means a majority of the MEC approved of it.
This is why we insist that pilot representatives be PILOT representatives. Reps should work under the contract they negotiate.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 06-27-2023, 06:59 AM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NuGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,903
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
This is why we insist that pilot representatives be PILOT representatives. Reps should work under the contract they negotiate.
Are reps not flying the line? Being a rep is not a full time gig.
NuGuy is offline  
Old 06-27-2023, 07:12 AM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Gramercy Riffs
Posts: 528
Default

You should look at some rep’s wide reports. Illuminating.
beernutt is offline  
Old 06-27-2023, 07:12 AM
  #68  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
What did our negotiators and MEC "testify" to during the RJ/flow down grievance? How did that work out?
That was a big error on the part of ALPA's President. Jo Depete did not follow the Admin Manual Section 40. It is my belief he was ignorant of the Admin Manual that he was tasked with administering. Either of the Delta candidates for that job would have been better informed.

Originally Posted by ALPA Admin Manual Section 40
. Prior to commencement of any bargaining for any ALPA pilot group within a
mainline/express system, the applicable Negotiating Committee will meet with the
Negotiating Committees of other ALPA pilot groups in the mainline/express system to review
opening scope proposals and how they advance ALPA’s scope goals and guidelines. The
committees will work with each other to develop a consensus on proposals; if, however, they
are unable to do so, subsection 3a below will apply.
a. Following consultation as specified above, and prior to submission of the scope proposal
to the airline, the applicable Negotiating Committee will report to the Scope
Subcommittee that ALPA pilot groups have consulted with one another and have or have
not reached consensus that the planned scope proposal meets ALPA’s scope goals and
guidelines; if the latter, Negotiating Committees of other ALPA pilot groups in the
system can submit statements of agreement or disagreement to the Scope Subcommittee,
which can recommend changes following consultation with the Negotiating Committees
involved.
b. The applicable Negotiating Committee and ALPA pilot groups within the
mainline/express system will develop in conjunction with the opening proposal agreed
reporting benchmarks with respect to developments in on-going scope negotiations which
will require that the Negotiating Committee provide updates on the status of scope
negotiations to the Scope Subcommittee. In the absence of consensual agreements
concerning benchmarks, the Scope Subcommittee will determine reporting benchmarks.
4. During the period that final approval of a collective bargaining agreement is subject to
Presidential review under the Constitution and By-Laws, MEC designated representatives of
all ALPA pilot groups within the mainline/express system may submit comments prior to the
Presidential signature concerning conformity of negotiated scope provisions with
recommendations of the Scope Subcommittee and Association policy
The President of ALPA should have never "authorized" the bargaining in violation of the Delta Pilots' Scope language and should not have ratified the conflicting agreement.

The Scope Committee Chairman should have brought this concern to the Delta MEC Chairman (do not know if that happened, maybe it did). The Delta MEC Chairman would have brought this concern to the President of ALPA. The President of ALPA would have saluted smartly and done what he was told by an Executive Board member with 15,000 votes & the defacto support of all the legacy carriers on scope issues - so more than 40,000 (DePete's airline has what, 4,500?). The President of ALPA will never f' with a major's MEC Chairman. Really just a phone call is enough to stop this kind of error in its tracks.

I do know that past Scope Committee Chairman used to have meals with the President of ALPA to protect Delta pilots from this kind of predatory negotiation. Tom Canoll was one of the best administrators the association ever had - which is really important when ALPA bargaining groups are trying to get into the flying performed by Delta pilots.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 06-27-2023, 07:12 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
StartngOvr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Drivin’ the bus
Posts: 728
Default

Originally Posted by crazyjaydawg
Sounds like the MEC chair went rogue on this and agreed to the settlement without consultation from the MEC itself.

Policy manual allows this. Two questions:

1) Should the policy manual be changed so that the Chair can’t unilaterally sign grievance settlements?

2) Should the current Chair be recalled over this blatant misstep?
TK says hello…..

StartngOvr is offline  
Old 06-27-2023, 07:18 AM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2022
Posts: 337
Default

Originally Posted by iaflyer
Yes - remember it's a two step process.

Trip goes out - the system auto Acknowledges it for you. The next step is Auto Award - you don't have to select this option (which is on the left in the iCrew screen).

What will happen is that you won't get any call when it Auto Acknowledges it, but you will get the Award call. Just ignore it or decline in the app.

Problem is - CS sometimes jumps the gun and puts it on your schedule. I've had that happen a few times - eventually they call, or they figure it out. Once I called after two hours to tell them I wasn't doing the trip, because I didn't accept the Award. No biggie, they just removed the trip from my line.
I think you, and a bunch of other posters before you, need to go look up the difference in accept and acknowledge. You accept the award first, and then can either decline or acknowledge it.
Puddytatt is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Excargodog
COVID19
70
11-26-2021 08:01 AM
RBZL
Part 135
481
03-13-2020 10:02 AM
purplepilot
Cargo
35
09-13-2007 04:00 AM
HSLD
Major
0
11-18-2005 01:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices