Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
MBCBP implementation announced… >

MBCBP implementation announced…

Search

Notices

MBCBP implementation announced…

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-2023, 09:51 AM
  #151  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunfighter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,614
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
How you can say something completely incorrect with such confidence and self assuredness blows my mind!

Another thought: what it a large chunk of Delta pilots retire in a down market in the future..I wonder how expensive it could get for the company to plus them up.
The risk is minimal. The company obligation is covering the shortfall between deposits and current value. They have no obligation for lost gains. Over time, earnings on previous years deposits will cover the spread. The risk is contained mostly to the early years when there aren't historical earnings to cover the loss.
Gunfighter is offline  
Old 05-27-2023, 09:57 AM
  #152  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,455
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
How you can say something completely incorrect with such confidence and self assuredness blows my mind!

Another thought: what it a large chunk of Delta pilots retire in a down market in the future..I wonder how expensive it could get for the company to plus them up.
With 60% bonds that won't happen. Which is why the company agreed.
notEnuf is online now  
Old 05-27-2023, 10:02 AM
  #153  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,597
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
With 60% bonds that won't happen. Which is why the company agreed.
That won't happen? Bond prices don't go down? You should of told that to SVB Management 😂
Trip7 is offline  
Old 05-27-2023, 10:14 AM
  #154  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunfighter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,614
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
With 60% bonds that won't happen. Which is why the company agreed.
Assuming LIRKX is the fund, it is down 6% in the last year. The 2022 return was a loss of 15%.

https://www.blackrock.com/us/individ...-portcl-k-fund

There is a HUGE difference between owing a bond fund vs the underlying bond. If you own the bond, you get your interest and stated return. If you own a bond fund, you are subject to fluctuations in valuation based on interest rate movement.
Gunfighter is offline  
Old 05-27-2023, 10:31 AM
  #155  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,597
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter
Assuming LIRKX is the fund, it is down 6% in the last year. The 2022 return was a loss of 15%.

https://www.blackrock.com/us/individ...-portcl-k-fund

There is a HUGE difference between owing a bond fund vs the underlying bond. If you own the bond, you get your interest and stated return. If you own a bond fund, you are subject to fluctuations in valuation based on interest rate movement.
Even if you own the bond you're subject to fluctuating values. As interest rates rise bond prices go down and vice versa(I know you are famaliar with this just re emphasizing). If you're holding to maturity you don't really care. But if you're forced to sell to cover cash outflows (retiring pilots lump sum payouts or in the case of SVB, deposit redemptions) bond prices can have a significant impact.
Trip7 is offline  
Old 05-27-2023, 10:33 AM
  #156  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PilotWombat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Position: Currently freeloading
Posts: 549
Default

Originally Posted by TurbineDriver
Why didn’t the union negotiate a more aggressive equity holding?
Because that isn't the point of a MBCBP. It's supposed to have the rewards of a defined benefit plan, but with the safety of a defined contribution plan. That means its not intended to be another brokerage type fund, with brokerage type returns (high or low). You're guaranteed not to lose money, but the flip side is that the returns won't be stellar either.

This is from Fidelity:
IRS rules require that a participant’s total return on their MBCB balance when they take their money out cannot be less than 0% in the aggregate. This does not forbid negative returns in a year, it just means that a participant must at least get the sum of their pay credits out of the plan when they take their money. Many MBCB plans put a cap on annual returns that are credited to participant accounts (e.g., 10%) to address non-discrimination testing and regulatory compliance. A cap has an added bonus of providing some cushion for the plan sponsor against having to pay for the 0% cumulative floor.
PilotWombat is offline  
Old 05-27-2023, 10:41 AM
  #157  
Roll’n Thunder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Pilot
Posts: 3,836
Default

Originally Posted by PilotWombat
Because that isn't the point of a MBCBP. It's supposed to have the rewards of a defined benefit plan, but with the safety of a defined contribution plan. That means its not intended to be another brokerage type fund, with brokerage type returns (high or low). You're guaranteed not to lose money, but the flip side is that the returns won't be stellar either.

This is from Fidelity:
So do we have a cap? If the fund has a +12% year, do we all reap that gain, or will some be held back to offset down years? Hopefully when more documentation is available it will answer stuff like this.
tennisguru is online now  
Old 05-27-2023, 10:41 AM
  #158  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,455
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
That won't happen? Bond prices don't go down? You should of told that to SVB Management 😂
Save my quote. It won't happen. A fund diversifies the risk enough and treasuries will be fine. The 18-24 month debt ceiling shenanigans are for grandstanding for reelection. Corporate bonds will be converted to equity and sold in a worst case. Rates are increasing over never before lows.
notEnuf is online now  
Old 05-27-2023, 12:03 PM
  #159  
Has a furrowed brow
 
Wolf424's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,201
Default

As someone who hasn’t had spill retirement paid out as income before…

Let’s say you had 1.5-2 months (6-9 weeks naturally) of excess DC paid out and taxed as income, that money is also eligible for profit sharing, correct?
Wolf424 is online now  
Old 05-27-2023, 12:30 PM
  #160  
Roll’n Thunder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Pilot
Posts: 3,836
Default

Originally Posted by Wolf424
As someone who hasn’t had spill retirement paid out as income before…

Let’s say you had 1.5-2 months (6-9 weeks naturally) of excess DC paid out and taxed as income, that money is also eligible for profit sharing, correct?
No, DC excess, per diem, etc are all excluded from your PS calculation.
tennisguru is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bucking Bar
Delta
395
11-18-2022 05:36 AM
PilotWombat
Delta
18
01-27-2020 10:30 AM
Adlerdriver
FedEx
4
06-16-2017 07:13 AM
Snarge
United
56
02-12-2013 06:33 AM
embflieger
United
19
12-23-2012 02:42 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices