Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Size of Delta LAX base >

Size of Delta LAX base

Search

Notices

Size of Delta LAX base

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-2023, 05:47 AM
  #11  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 598
Default

A word of caution on reading too much into upgrade times. While it's true that every NB fleet has CAs hired in 2022, that may not hold going forward with the AE (Delta speak for position bid) drought we've been having, and it creating a bid backlog. I think when the next AE comes, we'll see a lot of senior FOs who have been on the fence throw in an upgrade because they fear the next AE may not come for a while and the trips suck either way.

Not to be a conspiracy theorist, but I wonder if the AE drought was an intentional move by management to make upgrades more senior. Word is that they weren't happy at all by how junior 73N and ER A have been going and how they had to cancel positions to keep it from going to people currently in indoc. By creating this backlog, it will probably cause CA to trend more senior.

There's also going to be a lot of cross fleet movement. I think we'll see WB B (wide body FO) go much more senior. 350 will likely become the most junior of the WBs everywhere except LAX. It's unlikely newhires will be seeing 330 any more, even in NYC.

Another wild card is that this is the first AE all the MOAB pilots (covid displacement) and most of 2021-2022s newhires have been unlocked for. That will also make things go more senior. I think many of these pilots want the WBs but were seat locked out, and that's the reason it's been going to newhires. This drought maximized those seat locks too.
Tropical is offline  
Old 05-02-2023, 06:01 AM
  #12  
Leaves Biscoff crumbs
 
Meme In Command's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2020
Position: Blue Juice Taste Tester
Posts: 1,363
Default

Originally Posted by Tropical
A word of caution on reading too much into upgrade times. While it's true that every NB fleet has CAs hired in 2022, that may not hold going forward with the AE (Delta speak for position bid) drought we've been having, and it creating a bid backlog. I think when the next AE comes, we'll see a lot of senior FOs who have been on the fence throw in an upgrade because they fear the next AE may not come for a while and the trips suck either way.

Not to be a conspiracy theorist, but I wonder if the AE drought was an intentional move by management to make upgrades more senior. Word is that they weren't happy at all by how junior 73N and ER A have been going and how they had to cancel positions to keep it from going to people currently in indoc. By creating this backlog, it will probably cause CA to trend more senior.

There's also going to be a lot of cross fleet movement. I think we'll see WB B (wide body FO) go much more senior. 350 will likely become the most junior of the WBs everywhere except LAX. It's unlikely newhires will be seeing 330 any more, even in NYC.

Another wild card is that this is the first AE all the MOAB pilots (covid displacement) and most of 2021-2022s newhires have been unlocked for. That will also make things go more senior. I think many of these pilots want the WBs but were seat locked out, and that's the reason it's been going to newhires. This drought maximized those seat locks too.
Is there a reason for their dissatisfaction with the junior upgrades? Do they have data to show they're underperforming in some way?
Meme In Command is offline  
Old 05-02-2023, 06:04 AM
  #13  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 598
Default

Originally Posted by Meme In Command
Is there a reason for their dissatisfaction with the junior upgrades? Do they have data to show they're underperforming in some way?
My understanding is that they didn't want people getting A bids who haven't even passed initial IOE yet. Rumor is that NYC 73NA was going to go to a newhire still in indoc and BS had to pull the plug on a few positions to keep that from happening.
Tropical is offline  
Old 05-02-2023, 06:08 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Posts: 791
Default

Almost like not having a plan is the plan.

A5S
All 5 Stages is offline  
Old 05-02-2023, 06:19 AM
  #15  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 598
Default

Originally Posted by All 5 Stages
Almost like not having a plan is the plan.

A5S
"Son, the Russians don't take a dump without having a plan".
Tropical is offline  
Old 05-02-2023, 06:23 AM
  #16  
Leaves Biscoff crumbs
 
Meme In Command's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2020
Position: Blue Juice Taste Tester
Posts: 1,363
Default

Originally Posted by Tropical
My understanding is that they didn't want people getting A bids who haven't even passed initial IOE yet. Rumor is that NYC 73NA was going to go to a newhire still in indoc and BS had to pull the plug on a few positions to keep that from happening.
Oh ok that makes sense. To me this seems like such an easy "concession" to give the company during a negotiation. "Ok, no upgrade bids unless you've at least finished OE or have X hours in a DL aircraft" and then we ask for something we actually want in return.
Meme In Command is offline  
Old 05-02-2023, 06:31 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DeltaboundRedux's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2020
Position: Enoch Powell Enthusiast
Posts: 2,268
Default

Originally Posted by Meme In Command
Is there a reason for their dissatisfaction with the junior upgrades? Do they have data to show they're underperforming in some way?
To ask the question is to answer it.

Delta is a data driven business. But they’re not in the business of sharing it with every Lookie Lou.

It might simply be a matter if wanting to try and keep control of some of the Delta pilot standardization going forward with the massive influx of new hires from many different backgrounds. “Different” isn’t necessarily “wrong”, but aligning 15,000+ pilots to be replaceable cogs in a giant wheel doesn’t happen overnight.
DeltaboundRedux is offline  
Old 05-02-2023, 06:44 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2020
Posts: 1,881
Default

Originally Posted by Meme In Command
Oh ok that makes sense. To me this seems like such an easy "concession" to give the company during a negotiation. "Ok, no upgrade bids unless you've at least finished OE or have X hours in a DL aircraft" and then we ask for something we actually want in return.
No “concession” needed as this is an abhoration that will self correct. The only reason that it happened is because no other pilots wanted the position. Unfortunately, IMO, in a few years we’ll likely have pilots posting how they’ve been here over 3 years and still can’t even hold NYC CA position. Enjoy it while it lasts.

We fly, mgmt manages, they don’t “have” to award every position offered on an AE, but the ones they do have to be filled according to seniority.

The reason this is not addressed in the PWA is because it has been inconceivable for a vast period of major airline history.
nene is offline  
Old 05-02-2023, 06:59 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 2,356
Default

Looking at the NB bid packs alpa sent out yesterday, I don’t think NB A is going to trend senior massively. Maybe a few will bite with the new rates, but many NB Bs will just enjoy the pay rise. Likewise with ER not getting banded, and 321neo matching it, I don’t think it sees a spike in seniority for more than an AE or two before it settles down again.
PilotBases is offline  
Old 05-02-2023, 07:11 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: LAX ER
Posts: 1,606
Default

Originally Posted by PilotBases
Looking at the NB bid packs alpa sent out yesterday, I don’t think NB A is going to trend senior massively. Maybe a few will bite with the new rates, but many NB Bs will just enjoy the pay rise. Likewise with ER not getting banded, and 321neo matching it, I don’t think it sees a spike in seniority for more than an AE or two before it settles down again.
Are these for Jun rotations or the FRMT email we got yesterday. Would love to peek at Jun rotations if they’re out somewhere
tcco94 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
norskman2
Regional
18
07-18-2011 02:26 AM
fins
Regional
165
11-21-2008 08:26 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices