Mission plus
#391
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2020
Position: 330B
Posts: 129
I agree. Coming back from the Caribbean yesterday we were getting the crap beat out of us…..in an area FWV showed as no turbulence. Happens all the time.
#392
#393
#394
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,727
#395
On Reserve
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 23
I’ve the exact opposite true too. Many many times. FWV says “hang on” and it’s glass. It was fairly accurate once upon a time but this last year I find it fairly worthless other grabbing ATIS from it.
#396
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: everywhere but nowhere
Posts: 425
the sensors on our jets send the data to NCAR which creates the turbulence models that populate WWx. Theoretically, with more automatic reports, the more accurate the models.
#397
Yeah, thanks. I didn’t know the technical terms, but that’s what I was trying to say. As I understand it’s based on variations in AOA.
#399
#400
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 48
This is not proprietary, but a presentation of GTG (Graphical Turbulence Guidance) information. There are several products that use this information. I think that it is the GTG data that also drives the Jepp display of turbulence as well as the upper subscription levels of ForeFlight.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post