Search

Notices

How the AIP Happened

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-08-2022, 03:21 PM
  #211  
Moderator
 
FangsF15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,859
Default

Originally Posted by Nantonaku
Half year? How long has the scope AIP taken? Why would a whole contract rewrite be faster than that? And why would the company not drag it out as long as possible? We are working at greatly discounted rates from last decade. Maybe we would have this singed by next fall?
Do you have even the slightest awareness of WHY it took 6 months? This AIP is a completely different situation.
FangsF15 is offline  
Old 12-08-2022, 05:08 PM
  #212  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,535
Default

Originally Posted by Planetrain
This blows my mind.
The language should have been written already for the closed 22 sections. The remaining should be pretty easy to crank out in a day with 3 negotiators and a few lawyers. Figure a couple turns with the company, if they really wanted, this could be wrapped up before Christmas.
part of the timeline is the 2 weeks for the holidays the company takes off. negotiators said they are moving through it so it might be the first week of jan
tunes is offline  
Old 12-08-2022, 05:26 PM
  #213  
Gets Weekends Off
 
StartngOvr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Drivin’ the bus
Posts: 728
Default How the AIP Happened

Originally Posted by Flownit
my understanding on this issue is that company and ALPA kept arguing over how to establish the baseline upon which 1:1 growth would start. I have a feeling (personal conjecture follow) it was drawn out by the company until pwa negotiations were done, including section 1 (scope) which should dovetail with the global agreement.

They should be arguing it. If the start point for 1:1 growth isn’t DL metal on 50% at a minimum then it falls short.

I’m guessing the company wants to start 1:1 growth from a point measured below even where C2016 minimums are.

I hope there is going to be clear guidance on where our section 1 protections land if we ratify the contract TA but not the scope AIP. We could potentially end up working under a contract in which section 1 is blank. (Old section 1 protections from C2016 nullified with new TA.)
StartngOvr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FangsF15
Delta
363
12-02-2022 11:57 PM
Regional
17
05-09-2012 06:04 PM
CPSFO
Your Photos and Videos
3
10-26-2011 10:10 PM
Spin
Hangar Talk
6
03-16-2011 04:24 PM
got2fly
Money Talk
6
02-21-2011 03:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices