Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Prepare yourselves… 2023 AEs >

Prepare yourselves… 2023 AEs

Search

Notices

Prepare yourselves… 2023 AEs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-2023, 08:06 PM
  #6121  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,681
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
But is that not the same principle as training bypass in reverse? Paying pilots for work they aren't performing? Both circumstances, not the pilots fault.
but the training bypass is there to help the company if they so choose to use it, and exists entirely at the company’s discretion. not because foreign governments won’t let you fly to their country. (Which, as it stands currently, you are not pay protected for.)


Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
Your pound of flesh "quid" is your assumption.... pilots shouldn't pee in their boots until something gets passed.

I advocated for a PWA work around or LOA when age 67 reared it's head. If the MEC has not formulated a battle plan previously, shame on them.
if we don’t do anything the company will just not pay 65+ pilots to fly trips they are unqualified for. If a 65 year old can’t hold trips they are qualified to fly they are not pay protected. They can play games too. We may hold some cards, but it’s by no means a straight flush.

hopefully we can reach an agreement should 67 pass and I expect ALPA and management have been working on this behind the scenes. but I don’t expect anything like what JB wants to happen without significant gives by ALPA.
Gone Flying is offline  
Old 12-05-2023, 09:13 PM
  #6122  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,304
Default

Guys, we need to stop fighting each other..I kinda agree with JB here. If 67 happens and those pilots can't stay on their WB due to ICAO rules I would want ALPA to fight for them and get as much money from the company as possible. The company is our enemy, not fellow pilots. Let them have their money, it doesn't take anything from the rest of us.
m3113n1a1 is offline  
Old 12-05-2023, 10:36 PM
  #6123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Big E 757's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: A320 Left seat
Posts: 2,594
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond
Ok... He's a scenario for you. 67 passes but ICAO drags their feet. What is the best financial decision for 'Nick' in this case ( Or anyone else caught up in it). Should Delta pay protect him to go back to NB (would alpa advocate for that)? Or... Should he go out on disability at WB Captain pay?
Here is another option, if he's not indeed "Disabled", and he doesn't want to go back to NB at NB rates, how about just retire? Honestly, no one even considers that retirement is an option.
Big E 757 is offline  
Old 12-06-2023, 02:05 AM
  #6124  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,042
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
Guys, we need to stop fighting each other..I kinda agree with JB here. If 67 happens and those pilots can't stay on their WB due to ICAO rules I would want ALPA to fight for them and get as much money from the company as possible. The company is our enemy, not fellow pilots. Let them have their money, it doesn't take anything from the rest of us.
Just our seniority and 2 years of no movement.
hockeypilot44 is offline  
Old 12-06-2023, 02:13 AM
  #6125  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,042
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
Guys, we need to stop fighting each other..I kinda agree with JB here. If 67 happens and those pilots can't stay on their WB due to ICAO rules I would want ALPA to fight for them and get as much money from the company as possible. The company is our enemy, not fellow pilots. Let them have their money, it doesn't take anything from the rest of us.
Just our seniority and 2 years of no movement.
hockeypilot44 is offline  
Old 12-06-2023, 04:09 AM
  #6126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,609
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
Guys, we need to stop fighting each other..I kinda agree with JB here. If 67 happens and those pilots can't stay on their WB due to ICAO rules I would want ALPA to fight for them and get as much money from the company as possible. The company is our enemy, not fellow pilots. Let them have their money, it doesn't take anything from the rest of us.
If the company wants to be a charity, sure. But I'm not giving anything up for this. Not one penny. Age 67 is already a contractual concession to 90% of us
CBreezy is online now  
Old 12-06-2023, 04:12 AM
  #6127  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RonRicco's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: Captain
Posts: 830
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
Guys, we need to stop fighting each other..I kinda agree with JB here. If 67 happens and those pilots can't stay on their WB due to ICAO rules I would want ALPA to fight for them and get as much money from the company as possible. The company is our enemy, not fellow pilots. Let them have their money, it doesn't take anything from the rest of us.
Unless you don't consider profit sharing taking something?


The easy answer is this. Up until ICAO changes the age to match what the US has, you get paid what you can fly. If you are on the 350 and can hold all domestic, then you can get a full month. Bid reserve? The guarantee matches the domestic trip mix percentage or what you actually fly.

And have the option of an immediate VD for any age 65 plus pilot. This will allow the ones who believe there is a pilot shortage to bid into a category that has a lot of domestic flying to help alleaviate the problem they claim is the reason they should be able to fly into their golden years.
RonRicco is offline  
Old 12-06-2023, 05:16 AM
  #6128  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Position: 737 A
Posts: 1,070
Default

Originally Posted by RonRicco
Unless you don't consider profit sharing taking something?


The easy answer is this. Up until ICAO changes the age to match what the US has, you get paid what you can fly. If you are on the 350 and can hold all domestic, then you can get a full month. Bid reserve? The guarantee matches the domestic trip mix percentage or what you actually fly.

And have the option of an immediate VD for any age 65 plus pilot. This will allow the ones who believe there is a pilot shortage to bid into a category that has a lot of domestic flying to help alleaviate the problem they claim is the reason they should be able to fly into their golden years.
Seems simple enough. The only thing we might need to negotiate for a potential shenanigan the company could utilize. We should try and limit the company’s ability to bypass training on WB pilots choosing to bid NB. They could choose to trap a pilot in a category that doesn’t allow them to work a full schedule.
Vsop is offline  
Old 12-06-2023, 05:23 AM
  #6129  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Position: 350B
Posts: 76
Default

Originally Posted by Vsop
Seems simple enough. The only thing we might need to negotiate for a potential shenanigan the company could utilize. We should try and limit the company’s ability to bypass training on WB pilots choosing to bid NB. They could choose to trap a pilot in a category that doesn’t allow them to work a full schedule.
Well, there’s a conversion window to every AE.
DRaab is offline  
Old 12-06-2023, 05:25 AM
  #6130  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,681
Default

Originally Posted by DRaab
Well, there’s a conversion window to every AE.
training bypasses for longer than that conversion window are already contractual.
Gone Flying is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ColoradoAviator
Delta
3697
10-28-2022 05:00 AM
Trip7
Delta
3969
11-02-2021 09:57 AM
jsfBoat
Career Questions
2
05-12-2011 07:25 PM
Joachim
Regional
7
10-23-2007 06:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices