Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Prepare yourselves… 2023 AEs >

Prepare yourselves… 2023 AEs

Search

Notices

Prepare yourselves… 2023 AEs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-23-2023, 07:42 AM
  #5571  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Posts: 947
Default

Originally Posted by TED74
Of course they didn’t need VBs to reduce credit. Had we given them VBs, it would have been even worse.

Any other straw men?
You say that as if there’s any more credit that can be pulled from the large NB categories that VBs were going to involve.

We’d have 30 microbases across the system if they actually meant a meaningful reduction in credit. It’s very telling that the company never brought up VBs again after the pull-down.
ancman is offline  
Old 10-23-2023, 07:58 AM
  #5572  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,465
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
That is the way I remember it also. IMHO it was a missed opportunity - All DALPA had to do was insist the unilateral pull down capability was permanent. If the company would not agree to that then - No Deal. If the company did agree to that it would have allowed DALPA to continually decide if it was beneficial to the Pilots or not.

The potential disruption to the flying distribution was never understood by a lot of Pilots and was exploited by those who did not want this. The reduction in "credit time" via DHs was real, but we will never know the extent and how it might have affected the Pilot group as a whole.

In any case I believe the Union pulled it down as part of a bigger strategic move and that's fine, but it would have been nice to have tried it if we kept the unilateral pull down capability.

Scoop
Without the ongoing threat of a pull down the company would have slow rolled the bad and talked up the good. Besides, the institutional inertia once this was instituted would have made it difficult to retract given the demographics of commuters vs not commuters. There would have never been enough unity to halt it after the fact. I'm glad it never was. YMMV
notEnuf is offline  
Old 10-23-2023, 08:13 AM
  #5573  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Posts: 947
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Without the ongoing threat of a pull down the company would have slow rolled the bad and talked up the good. Besides, the institutional inertia once this was instituted would have made it difficult to retract given the demographics of commuters vs not commuters. There would have never been enough unity to halt it after the fact. I'm glad it never was. YMMV
Yes, there was a palpable fear within ALPA that VBs may become too popular if line pilots saw them in action. Thus the smoke and mirrors show to the pilot group over how bad they were going to be, without any attempts to further negotiate better language or collect data from a trial.

I do agree with you that us having permanent pull-down language would have been essential.
ancman is offline  
Old 10-23-2023, 08:51 AM
  #5574  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 905
Default

Originally Posted by brakechatter
Didn't forget anything. The team that negotiated it did. Stand by my post, except to clarify that the company could not just unilaterally pull time from any base, while at the same time being in complete control of the outcome of where the time came from, if any. Somewhat akin to the AE process.
Neither was the point of the post -- in that the pulldown was not some mentality to protect the PTC mafia.
Not sure if this was directed at my reply or not, but the following part of your post was incorrect:

Originally Posted by brakechatter
This is not correct. There was no required timeline that the Company had to meet
Here is the language from MOU 16-03:

​​​​​​​This MOU will become effective on its date of signing and will remain in effect for a period of one year following December 1, 2016 unless extended by agreement of the parties. The provisions of Paragraph 1. Virtual Basing and Paragraph 2. Temporary Duty may be terminated at any time, separately or jointly, upon written notice by either party.
In the absence of an agreement to extend, the MOU terminated on November 30, 2017. No such agreement happened, and the company missed the deadline of the MOU.
bugman61 is offline  
Old 10-23-2023, 10:04 AM
  #5575  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jughead135's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: Hates Commuting
Posts: 960
Default

Originally Posted by Jaww
If FAs get PS, do you think pilots will immediately get it too before the ink dries? /s
I see your sarcasm tag, so not sure if you’re serious on this part. The ink is already dry on our side: §24.L.1.


As we all know, the company would never violate the contract, sooooo..,,.
Jughead135 is offline  
Old 10-23-2023, 11:29 AM
  #5576  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PilotWombat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Position: Currently freeloading
Posts: 550
Default

Originally Posted by Jughead135
I see your sarcasm tag, so not sure if you’re serious on this part. The ink is already dry on our side: §24.L.1.


As we all know, the company would never violate the contract, sooooo..,,.
"Sorry FA's, we can't give you PS commuting because we'd have to give it to the pilots too. You understand..."
PilotWombat is offline  
Old 10-23-2023, 11:45 AM
  #5577  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,558
Default

Originally Posted by Nick Bradshaw
I stopped reading this and all your posts after this statement. Oct 2023 join date? Been here 30 years? 21 posts so far this month. So basically, you want us to believe you quietly lurked here all these years, now "suddenly" you have lots to say?

No, it's one of these options:

1. Long time APC-er who got his account banned so you opened a new one
2. New troll account (CBreezyOOfff is that you?)
3. You're Lying
4. All of the above

Either way, you have zero credibility with your "been here over 30 years". Nice round number. Sure you have.
You say you’ve been at delta a long time but only joined apc in 2020… Credibility gone. But maybe you didn’t have any because all to often you don’t respond to the subject of the post, you just try to attack the poster.
Iceberg is offline  
Old 10-23-2023, 12:20 PM
  #5578  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 670
Default

Originally Posted by Iceberg
You say you’ve been at delta a long time but only joined apc in 2020… Credibility gone. But maybe you didn’t have any because all to often you don’t respond to the subject of the post, you just try to attack the poster.
You mean like you just did? Lol. Try harder.
Nick Bradshaw is offline  
Old 10-23-2023, 12:35 PM
  #5579  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,465
Default

Originally Posted by Iceberg
You say you’ve been at delta a long time but only joined apc in 2020… Credibility gone. But maybe you didn’t have any because all to often you don’t respond to the subject of the post, you just try to attack the poster.
False equivalence: Being hired at Delta requires APC membership upon hire date ( no earlier or later) and account holders never disappear and reappear as an alter ego. This is actually the worst credibility attack argument I've seen, ever.
notEnuf is offline  
Old 10-23-2023, 02:57 PM
  #5580  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,558
Default

Originally Posted by Nick Bradshaw
You mean like you just did? Lol. Try harder.
You don’t like your own argument?
Iceberg is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ColoradoAviator
Delta
3697
10-28-2022 04:00 AM
Trip7
Delta
3969
11-02-2021 08:57 AM
jsfBoat
Career Questions
2
05-12-2011 06:25 PM
Joachim
Regional
7
10-23-2007 05:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices