Originally Posted by Jaww
(Post 3681661)
What’s is the point you’re making? That Curly gets a pass because it is convenient for the pilots? Hmmm. Absolute good ole boy nonsense.
*Note* I was an iCrewMax user, and was genuinely beaked when DL shut their access. I'm not defending the ouster. I just see them as two totally different issues. And if DC retiree's actually do get unfettered access, this really is a moo issue. |
Originally Posted by FangsF15
(Post 3681672)
My point is Curly was once privy to ALL the information he uses for his site without restriction, and had his site up and running for years with DL's full knowledge/blessing. He's not an outside/3rd party company trying to piggy back, or more critically tunnel in to DL's servers.
*Note* I was an iCrewMax user, and was genuinely beaked when DL shut their access. I'm not defending the ouster. I just see them as two totally different issues. And if DC retiree's actually do get unfettered access, this really is a moo issue. |
Originally Posted by Jaww
(Post 3681674)
So Uncle Ed always get access to my personal data? Cool.
|
Originally Posted by FangsF15
(Post 3681691)
I'm not sure why this is such a big deal? Seriously, we have 16,000+ pilots on the seniority list with the exact same access to... Your Name and DOB. I mean, CJO holders not yet on property get access to it for crying out loud.
there is no provision for a retired pilot to make money using ostensibly protected personal data, nor should there be. but by golly, we'll need to use an 8 digit passcode to protect...something. |
Originally Posted by StoneQOLdCrazy
(Post 3681694)
curly is not on the seniority list and probably 5000 pilots have been hired since he left, which he never would have had access to. Defending this kind of corporate hypocrisy and data mining is troubling.
there is no provision for a retired pilot to make money using ostensibly protected personal data, nor should there be. but by golly, we'll need to use an 8 digit passcode to protect...something. the guy likes the excel sheets and getting different views of the data. Hes not taking the money and buying an island either, in 15 years i doubt itll be around. I dont wanna have to program all that on excel like i did the previous company. Just relax about this **** youre gonna end up making a load of work for me. |
Originally Posted by Gone Flying
(Post 3681579)
if WS gives me bad data the worst that happens is I screw up my bid and that’s a me problem. If oak notes gives me bad data and I screw up that happens in a DL flight deck and that’s a DL problem and leaves the door wide open for them wrt liability. That’s why the double standard.
So not sure how it is going to happen as you describe. I would say let's test it. Shouldn't take long to see how accurate reliable and robust his stuff is. Id wager it would pass any rigorous tests with flying colors as again he's simply harvesting data direct from Miss+ But we can't have good things like that so let's kill it. And then there was iCrewMax.... good stuff but again, deemed inappropriate for our use for some silly reason |
Oops this is the AE thread
#GoFlex |
Originally Posted by StoneQOLdCrazy
(Post 3681694)
curly is not on the seniority list and probably 5000 pilots have been hired since he left, which he never would have had access to. Defending this kind of corporate hypocrisy and data mining is troubling.
there is no provision for a retired pilot to make money using ostensibly protected personal data, nor should there be. but by golly, we'll need to use an 8 digit passcode to protect...something. Why are people trying to create a problem where there isn’t one? |
Originally Posted by Xray678
(Post 3682051)
Why are people trying to create a problem where there isn’t one? |
Just one more example of big D's hypocrisy. Pilots - pro Bell. Company - pro Curls. Now about the AE, who's gonna have the break down first?
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:22 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands