Another factor coming up that I haven't seen in this discussion is the implementation of golden days for training starting in January. Does anyone know how that transition is supposed to go? Is it effective for anyone with training days after January 1 or does it start with the first AE bid awarded after January 1?
I wonder how many will skip the AEs that train in Nov/Dec to get the holidays off and delay training until we have the golden day provision active. |
Originally Posted by 321pilot
(Post 3669563)
Another factor coming up that I haven't seen in this discussion is the implementation of golden days for training starting in January. Does anyone know how that transition is supposed to go? Is it effective for anyone with training days after January 1 or does it start with the first AE bid awarded after January 1?
I wonder how many will skip the AEs that train in Nov/Dec to get the holidays off and delay training until we have the golden day provision active. I'm also curious how many are sitting out pending age 67 legislation. If the music stops, what seat do you want? |
Originally Posted by Gunfighter
(Post 3669647)
Raises hand. *Except for WBA longshots that occupy bid positions 1-7
I'm also curious how many are sitting out pending age 67 legislation. If the music stops, what seat do you want? airline is still growing fleets and widebodies. also, if ICAO doesn’t jump on it then it really won’t stop the movement since WBA seats would still be opening Lots of uncertainty, especially it even gets off the ground in Capitol Hill. It barely made it through committees… |
Originally Posted by tcco94
(Post 3669655)
Is age 67 really going to be a music stopping event? 1/3 of the pilots at age 65 aren’t even active. I imagine that number will only go one way if age 67 went, and that’s up.
airline is still growing fleets and widebodies. also, if ICAO doesn’t jump on it then it really won’t stop the movement since WBA seats would still be opening Lots of uncertainty, especially it even gets off the ground in Capitol Hill. It barely made it through committees… |
Originally Posted by tcco94
(Post 3669655)
Is age 67 really going to be a music stopping event? 1/3 of the pilots at age 65 aren’t even active. I imagine that number will only go one way if age 67 went, and that’s up.
airline is still growing fleets and widebodies. also, if ICAO doesn’t jump on it then it really won’t stop the movement since WBA seats would still be opening Lots of uncertainty, especially it even gets off the ground in Capitol Hill. It barely made it through committees… |
Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
(Post 3669530)
Maybe..a lot of people (with kids) don't like to train during the summer though also. But Delta also doesn't like to train as much during the summer either due to that being our busiest flying period. It'll be interesting to see if there's a pattern.
Assuming we’re still doing this in 6 months, you’ll have shook the tree pretty well, and the bids will become much more predictable. |
Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
(Post 3669681)
Well the bill passed the house this morning and will go to the Senate and then reconciliation. It's looking more and more like it'll pass... unfortunately.
|
Originally Posted by Xray678
(Post 3669704)
I would bet if the age goes up it will have very little effect on the number who are not active. It will still be roughly 30%. I also bet if we raise the age, ICAO follows very shortly after. If they don’t beat us to it.
as far as the number staying the same and having little effect, not sure I agree with that. Not everyone is going to go to 67. System will still be worked. still The overall point I wanted to make was the whole music will stop with growth a 2 year kick down the road unsure of how the results shake up might be too quick of a judgement. Can’t really extrapolate the same as 60 to 65 either. Too hard to really tell how this whole thing plays out. Think some are getting a little ahead of themselves with doomsday predictions |
Originally Posted by tcco94
(Post 3669749)
Certainly ICAO would probably follow suit, haven’t seen anything about them even moving in any capacity yet to raise it though. Let alone beat us.
as far as the number staying the same and having little effect, not sure I agree with that. Not everyone is going to go to 67. System will still be worked. still The overall point I wanted to make was the whole music will stop with growth a 2 year kick down the road unsure of how the results shake up might be too quick of a judgement. Can’t really extrapolate the same as 60 to 65 either. Too hard to really tell how this whole thing plays out. Think some are getting a little ahead of themselves with doomsday predictions |
Originally Posted by interceptorpilo
(Post 3669757)
So what you are saying is we have to pass the bill to know what’s in it? TIC. We have no say or control in this. It’s a **** sandwich that if served we have to eat.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:32 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands