Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Prepare yourselves… 2023 AEs >

Prepare yourselves… 2023 AEs

Search

Notices

Prepare yourselves… 2023 AEs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-19-2023, 06:45 AM
  #3111  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,728
Default

Originally Posted by Gooner
My read is that it will forever be the hub that should be a base but can’t be justified by the efficiency craving crew resources team. The ones that plan the pre month schedule, not the ones that actually deal with the inevitable fall out 6 months of the year. Placing more junior crews in the north east doesn’t really solve the fact you can just create turns or W international trips, those work great. #nopremonthcredit

I mean RDU/MCO/TPA/MIA have been in this category for a long time. Too easy to cover by the large ATL/NYC/DTW crew bases.

I’m guessing they’re doing the math on layover costs, crew transportation downtown, hotels, etc. vs opening a base, which also costs them money in rent, if they’re going to have a CPO and a pilot lounge, employee parking, etc. Then there’s the “efficiency” argument of having pilots on reserve there, vs those W trips you mentioned above.

They already have a FA base and lounge there, maybe they’ll just add to that space if they ever decide to re-open BOS. I was based in MIA in 1985 and BOS from 1986-1996 when they closed all the smaller bases to save money. In 1985 my new hire seniority number was 3879, and Delta had bases in BOS, MIA, ORD, MSY, IAH, DFW and ATL.

Now Delta has nearly 16,000 pilots and none of those earlier bases, except ATL of course, but they picked up NYC from the Pan Am merger and SLC, LAX from the Western merger then DTW, MSP and SEA from the NW merger. They opened and closed CVG, MCO and PDX, and closed MEM.

I don’t know what “cost metric” they use to rationalize opening a base, I would think hotels and crew transport would be at the top of the list but only they know for sure.

There was a guy named David Watson who was in charge of crew resources years ago before 9-11 and bankruptcy, who said if it were up to him, there would only be 1 base, ATL, and every reserve would fly 75hrs every month. I asked him who was going to fly during a wx event if every reserve was already flying 75hrs. He said, “That’s what Green Slips are for.”
Timbo is offline  
Old 06-19-2023, 07:17 AM
  #3112  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,032
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
I’m guessing they’re doing the math on layover costs, crew transportation downtown, hotels, etc. vs opening a base, which also costs them money in rent, if they’re going to have a CPO and a pilot lounge, employee parking, etc. Then there’s the “efficiency” argument of having pilots on reserve there, vs those W trips you mentioned above.

They already have a FA base and lounge there, maybe they’ll just add to that space if they ever decide to re-open BOS. I was based in MIA in 1985 and BOS from 1986-1996 when they closed all the smaller bases to save money. In 1985 my new hire seniority number was 3879, and Delta had bases in BOS, MIA, ORD, MSY, IAH, DFW and ATL.

Now Delta has nearly 16,000 pilots and none of those earlier bases, except ATL of course, but they picked up NYC from the Pan Am merger and SLC, LAX from the Western merger then DTW, MSP and SEA from the NW merger. They opened and closed CVG, MCO and PDX, and closed MEM.

I don’t know what “cost metric” they use to rationalize opening a base, I would think hotels and crew transport would be at the top of the list but only they know for sure.

There was a guy named David Watson who was in charge of crew resources years ago before 9-11 and bankruptcy, who said if it were up to him, there would only be 1 base, ATL, and every reserve would fly 75hrs every month. I asked him who was going to fly during a wx event if every reserve was already flying 75hrs. He said, “That’s what Green Slips are for.”
From listening to current management, the breaking of seat locks and training are the primary expenses the company is trying to avoid. If it were up to Delta, a pilot would bid one seat, and stay there.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 06-19-2023, 07:19 AM
  #3113  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2021
Posts: 57
Default

Originally Posted by skitheline
Any chance we ever see a BOS base for DL or has this idea been squashed completely?
The way they worded the rationalization makes it sound like BOS would need its flying to be less-diluted across fleets before a base makes sense. With the 717 now gone, the only other fleet at less-than 2019 levels in BOS is the 7ER... so it would seem logical that 7ER flying needs to be handed off to the other fleets before a BOS domicile could be revisited.
fadecfault is offline  
Old 06-19-2023, 07:19 AM
  #3114  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,032
Default

Originally Posted by skitheline
Looks like a BOS base is out of the picture for DL at the moment. Any chance we ever see a BOS base for DL or has this idea been squashed completely?
Waiting for the mass of A320's to go self-sustaining; a critical mass.

Maybe that is the wrong metaphor. They are bumping off each other already.

Let me think about this.

Ah' the issue is purity. Most of the neutrino action is from B737 atoms. We've almost eliminated the CL-65 and E190 contamination. A little A320NEO-XLR would really make a nice BANG! But so far, no love for those extra belly tanks and lack of cargo space.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 06-19-2023, 07:50 AM
  #3115  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 598
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
We've almost eliminated the CL-65 and E190 contamination.
Well that is also a problem. There's still a ton of RJ flying in BOS. E175s everywhere. I'd say at least 1/3 of the gates have an RJ at them at any given moment and they're broken all the time and lollygag on the ramp when they actually go. That takes up space a mainline jet could park at. The Taj Mullin simply isn't big enough for an efficient base. If only we had a bigger terminal there.
Tropical is offline  
Old 06-19-2023, 07:51 AM
  #3116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlexManFlex's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Posts: 633
Default

Originally Posted by dragon
Ah, I see that now.

I know folks have been surprised by training when they were counting on the conversion memo.

Agree on the late summer AEs being smaller if they can actually do them monthly.
Yep. When they say expect September for current pilots, that’s great. But it’s the “some may go earlier or later” that’s the thing. But if we really do have an AE July/August it’ll be bigger for those October/November classes is my guess!
FlexManFlex is offline  
Old 06-19-2023, 08:07 AM
  #3117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,731
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Waiting for the mass of A320's to go self-sustaining; a critical mass.

Maybe that is the wrong metaphor. They are bumping off each other already.

Let me think about this.

Ah' the issue is purity. Most of the neutrino action is from B737 atoms. We've almost eliminated the CL-65 and E190 contamination. A little A320NEO-XLR would really make a nice BANG! But so far, no love for those extra belly tanks and lack of cargo space.
XLR rumor… I believe that’s called “tickling the dragon.”
Planetrain is offline  
Old 06-19-2023, 08:32 AM
  #3118  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,032
Default

Originally Posted by Tropical
The Taj Mullin simply isn't big enough
... the Dude laughed out loud.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 06-19-2023, 08:34 AM
  #3119  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,032
Default

Originally Posted by Planetrain
XLR rumor… I believe that’s called “tickling the dragon.”
Well, don't drop a heavy brick on it.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 06-19-2023, 03:14 PM
  #3120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,974
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo

There was a guy named David Watson who was in charge of crew resources years ago before 9-11 and bankruptcy, who said if it were up to him, there would only be 1 base, ATL, and every reserve would fly 75hrs every month. I asked him who was going to fly during a wx event if every reserve was already flying 75hrs. He said, “That’s what Green Slips are for.”
He sounds like an idiot. My former regional had the same mentality and it was always an operational dumpster fire. They even brought in a hugely expensive consulting firm who showed them that a system similar to what we had at Delta (pre-optimizer) would save them millions per year: protecting reserves and only using them when absolutely needed. It’s a bit more nuanced in the details but it’s still amazing at how inept airline scheduling personnel apparently can be.
Gspeed is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ColoradoAviator
Delta
3697
10-28-2022 04:00 AM
Trip7
Delta
3969
11-02-2021 08:57 AM
jsfBoat
Career Questions
2
05-12-2011 06:25 PM
Joachim
Regional
7
10-23-2007 05:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices