Prepare yourselves… 2023 AEs
#2811
Runs with scissors
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,756
Just a guess but the -400 all of us (7ER pilots) are already typed for. We could fly it, it’s just delta doesn’t do things this way from some old way we use to do it. I believe because there was a 76 domestic and international back in the day.
320 to 330 is a short course, but nevertheless, a new type rating. A 320 pilot can’t fly a 330. A 7ER pilot can fly a -400. It’s just delta likes to be difficult
320 to 330 is a short course, but nevertheless, a new type rating. A 320 pilot can’t fly a 330. A 7ER pilot can fly a -400. It’s just delta likes to be difficult
Interesting historical tidbit; the 767-400 was originally a domestic only aircraft and it arrived without HF radios, as a replacement jet for our retiring L10-11 domestic aircraft. It originally flew from MCO, PBI, FLL, MIA to LGA most of the time, just like the L10-11s it was replacing. There were a few “incidents” when landing in LGA in the wet, snowy winter months and it was decided maybe it wasn’t a good idea to go there with that jet, so they installed the HF radios and started sending them to Europe.
#2812
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 458
The reason you 767ER guys can’t fly the 767-400 is because the -400 has different avionics displays, ie. flat screens vs round dials for airspeed and altitude.
Interesting historical tidbit; the 767-400 was originally a domestic only aircraft and it arrived without HF radios, as a replacement jet for our retiring L10-11 domestic aircraft. It originally flew from MCO, PBI, FLL, MIA to LGA most of the time, just like the L10-11s it was replacing. There were a few “incidents” when landing in LGA in the wet, snowy winter months and it was decided maybe it wasn’t a good idea to go there with that jet, so they installed the HF radios and started sending them to Europe.
Interesting historical tidbit; the 767-400 was originally a domestic only aircraft and it arrived without HF radios, as a replacement jet for our retiring L10-11 domestic aircraft. It originally flew from MCO, PBI, FLL, MIA to LGA most of the time, just like the L10-11s it was replacing. There were a few “incidents” when landing in LGA in the wet, snowy winter months and it was decided maybe it wasn’t a good idea to go there with that jet, so they installed the HF radios and started sending them to Europe.
I mean, they could fly it, as long as they got the difference training and then did a few hours in the sim every year like United does. And that’s the major reason why we don’t, sim time. We have only 1, United has two. That’s it in the world.
If our sim burnt to the ground we would be in deep you know what
#2813
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 96
Thank you! B-to-A as “Other” hadn’t crossed my mind.
#2815
Not sure why that would b a factor. In my short stint at AAL, I flew the 75/76, and one leg you'd have a jet with round dials and the next leg you might have a jet with flat screens. Maybe that was a short term solutions approved by the FAA. I really didn't think anything of it at the time
#2817
22.G. was specifically changed to take the number of training days out of the equation (to prevent the company from extending the course by 1 day and getting additional freeze months out of a pilot, like they did with the 320>330 course a few years ago). As I said, the 7ER/400 was just an "example" in 22.G, not a definitive list, but still...
#2818
Not sure why that would b a factor. In my short stint at AAL, I flew the 75/76, and one leg you'd have a jet with round dials and the next leg you might have a jet with flat screens. Maybe that was a short term solutions approved by the FAA. I really didn't think anything of it at the time
Also, useless trivia... the reason the -400 category name is the 765 is because there used to be a domestic (764) and international (765) category. When they got rid of the domestic only category, they kept the international designator with the pilots in it. Dumb, but this is Doing Everything Like The Amish after all...
300 (7ER's) are older by a good bit.
#2819
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: Looking left
Posts: 3,418
UAL flies thee 767-300 and -400 in one category. My understanding is that the FAA would have allowed DL to do it too, but they would have had to maintain a currency in both aircraft simultaneously. DL did not want to deal with that headache, so the company decided to kept them separate categories.
Also, useless trivia... the reason the -400 category name is the 765 is because there used to be a domestic (764) and international (765) category. When they got rid of the domestic only category, they kept the international designator with the pilots in it. Dumb, but this is Doing Everything Like The Amish after all...
300 (7ER's) are older by a good bit.
Also, useless trivia... the reason the -400 category name is the 765 is because there used to be a domestic (764) and international (765) category. When they got rid of the domestic only category, they kept the international designator with the pilots in it. Dumb, but this is Doing Everything Like The Amish after all...
300 (7ER's) are older by a good bit.
Older by roughly 5 years.
https://www.planespotters.net/airline/Delta-Air-Lines
#2820
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 2,469
There were 9 or so post-y2k 763s that are now flying for Amazon. Might have been helpful here, in hindsight…
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post