Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Prepare yourselves… 2023 AEs >

Prepare yourselves… 2023 AEs

Search

Notices

Prepare yourselves… 2023 AEs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-2023, 10:09 AM
  #2101  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 7,000
Default

Originally Posted by 4fans
Delta tends to need a business case for any decision that costs money. It is possible that one data point in their business case calculation is a projection of how many paid moves a new base would generate. If this is the case, then people that are willing to move is likely on the cost side and people who are already there are not.

just a theory.

I see this as a factor but not a big deal. Open the base with a smallish number and you would not have a lot of moves. A one time expense that would continually save on Hotels and possibly Premium pay (if they don't screw up the staffing that is). How does an average move cost compare with a single 6 day 330/350/765A GS?

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 04-19-2023, 11:02 AM
  #2102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,768
Default

SLC350? Did he really say that or is that what we all wanted to hear? This rumor doesn’t pass the smell test at all.
Planetrain is offline  
Old 04-19-2023, 11:02 AM
  #2103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 795
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
I see this as a factor but not a big deal. Open the base with a smallish number and you would not have a lot of moves. A one time expense that would continually save on Hotels and possibly Premium pay (if they don't screw up the staffing that is). How does an average move cost compare with a single 6 day 330/350/765A GS?

Scoop
You’re right Scoop, and I also don’t have any details of the many other variables that are obviously influencing their basing decisions. I’m also not claiming that not opening Boston is a good or bad decision. I was just trying to point out that a person being willing to move to a new base might not positively influence Delta’s decision-making the way we think it might.

I do believe that the people with all of the information are making the decision not to open Boston based on the dollars. They might even factor in the cost of a potential base or category closure down the road in their cost equation.

It becomes more difficult to effectively second-guess decisions when we realize we don’t have access to the same information as the decision maker.
4fans is offline  
Old 04-19-2023, 11:37 AM
  #2104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: Looking left
Posts: 3,399
Default

Originally Posted by 4fans
Delta tends to need a business case for any decision that costs money. It is possible that one data point in their business case calculation is a projection of how many paid moves a new base would generate. If this is the case, then people that are willing to move is likely on the cost side and people who are already there are not.

just a theory.
A few weeks ago at propel convention, EB said we had grown in BOS and were now the number 1 airline.

PB said that right now BOS is cost neutral...the cost to open the base (and cut down on hotels) is about the same as the current model of DH folks up there from NY to cover rotations and paying for all the hotels room...while he didn't say it, he was inferring that it would take some additional growth to tip the cost savings scale toward the open a new base decision.

And the 320 out of BOS serves 13 destinations, which is same as JFK, and one more than LGA (12)
DWC CAP10 USAF is offline  
Old 04-19-2023, 11:39 AM
  #2105  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 51
Default

Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
I mean, times have also changed a bit. Many younger-hires/commuters aren’t moving to base because the bases are quite frankly garbage places to live. Sure there are nice things in any city, but as an aggregate I’d say most of the Delta hubs (and the same can be said for every other legacy too in my opinion) are undesirable places to live with high cost of living that negate some of the benefits of living in base. I’ll keep my house at the beach, lower cost of living, and good schools and continue to commute.
I hope you can appreciate the irony in calling places high cost of living and undesirable at the same time.
pixelflying is offline  
Old 04-19-2023, 11:49 AM
  #2106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CX500T's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Position: NYC 7ERA
Posts: 2,063
Default

Originally Posted by pixelflying
I hope you can appreciate the irony in calling places high cost of living and undesirable at the same time.
Places can be high cost of living and undesirable at the same time.

In the case of NYC or LA, if you are in the entertainment industry, you kind of need to live near one.

Financial Services? NYC is a big hub for that (as is Chicago)

Tech? Seattle or SFO.

But some places have very out of whack cost of living with the desirability for people with my lifestyle and desires. When I was in the oil field, Casper Wyoming was expensive as hell, as was Gillette, WY. Local markets driven crazy by influx of oil dollars, but not really that great of a place to live. I was spending $2,000 a month for 1 bedroom apartment in a OK but not super fancy part of town in 2011. Not a lot of people have Casper, WY high on their "lets go here" list. We made the best of it, but when I was out of that industry, the house that we ended up buying was on the market the next day. (it was a weird dynamic where apartments were stupid expensive, but houses were just expensive but not unobtainable)
CX500T is offline  
Old 04-19-2023, 12:53 PM
  #2107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunfighter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,647
Default

Originally Posted by pixelflying
I hope you can appreciate the irony in calling places high cost of living and undesirable at the same time.
High cost of living makes a place undesirable for a pilot with limited resources. I don't get how you can call that ironic. The fact that many of the high cost places are cities in decline further makes the case for undesirability.
Gunfighter is offline  
Old 04-19-2023, 12:58 PM
  #2108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: LAX ER
Posts: 1,606
Default

Originally Posted by Planetrain
SLC350? Did he really say that or is that what we all wanted to hear? This rumor doesn’t pass the smell test at all.
330 has 3-5 departures throughout the year but now 350 is rumor for having… zero
tcco94 is offline  
Old 04-19-2023, 02:28 PM
  #2109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 311
Default

Originally Posted by tcco94
330 has 3-5 departures throughout the year but now 350 is rumor for having… zero
Don’t you dare bring logic into this conversation. It’s a bannable offense
peepz is offline  
Old 04-19-2023, 03:37 PM
  #2110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: LAX ER
Posts: 1,606
Default

Originally Posted by peepz
Don’t you dare bring logic into this conversation. It’s a bannable offense
ATL220!!!! It’s coming!
tcco94 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ColoradoAviator
Delta
3697
10-28-2022 04:00 AM
Trip7
Delta
3969
11-02-2021 08:57 AM
jsfBoat
Career Questions
2
05-12-2011 06:25 PM
Joachim
Regional
7
10-23-2007 05:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices