Search

Notices

What Is Full Retro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-05-2022, 12:24 PM
  #101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,006
Default

Lucky for us, there’s a good chance the mediator buys groceries, airline tickets, gas, cars, electricity and maybe even tuition/books/fees.
TED74 is offline  
Old 10-05-2022, 12:54 PM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tailhookah's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Widget Jet
Posts: 765
Default

TA1/2015…. Company was trying to low ball us and in addition get rid of profit sharing. They knew the next few years and beyond that profit sharing was going to be enormous. They only tried to deal that away because they knew what was being projected in the future. If they thought they’d be breaking even for the next cycle after that turd was signed, they wouldn’t have come after it. Just like now…. The projections are for enormous profits very soon. They think we make too much now and throw in our profit sharing on top and it literally ticks off the executives. They think we make too much. We have to take this contract from them by using our only leverage we have. Strike. Forward looking statements are enormous and also continually are being updated higher. They don’t want to pay us. It’s that simple. They spray us w/ false rhetoric while laughing behind our backs. Restoration of our profession now or forever be whimps.
Tailhookah is offline  
Old 10-05-2022, 01:03 PM
  #103  
Line Holder
 
b73nav8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Capt
Posts: 56
Default

Originally Posted by Tailhookah
TA1/2015…. Company was trying to low ball us and in addition get rid of profit sharing. They knew the next few years and beyond that profit sharing was going to be enormous. They only tried to deal that away because they knew what was being projected in the future. If they thought they’d be breaking even for the next cycle after that turd was signed, they wouldn’t have come after it. Just like now…. The projections are for enormous profits very soon. They think we make too much now and throw in our profit sharing on top and it literally ticks off the executives. They think we make too much. We have to take this contract from them by using our only leverage we have. Strike. Forward looking statements are enormous and also continually are being updated higher. They don’t want to pay us. It’s that simple. They spray us w/ false rhetoric while laughing behind our backs. Restoration of our profession now or forever be whimps.

This!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
b73nav8r is offline  
Old 10-05-2022, 02:14 PM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,523
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I sure hope the negotiators are smart enough to not compare us to the flight attendants. Company to mediator; “We are more than happy to match the flight attendant raises and will even call the boarding pay 16% however we want to align the pilots sick leave, work rules and retirement with the flight attendants!”
Again you tack to company arguments. The pay increase goes to affordability and a precedent for timely raises Delta is willing to grant for flight crews without concession. Flight crew pay is very different and this distinction for preflight changes the historic norm. Go ahead and exclude all but company arguments, your position is well known.

Last edited by notEnuf; 10-05-2022 at 02:24 PM.
notEnuf is online now  
Old 10-05-2022, 02:19 PM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,523
Default

Originally Posted by bugman61
Cool. Me too.

The board will use all of the tools at their disposal to force the parties to get to a reasonable deal. The further your table position is from what they deem reasonable, the harder it will be to get a release. It’s not as simple as just refusing to agree until they give up.

If our table position was a 50% raise DOS, the timeline and process to get a release would be much longer than if it was 20%. Similarly if the company was insisting on significant concessions it would be easier for us to get a release if that’s what we wanted.



I agree with you here, at least to the extent that we must do what it takes to get a significant shift in our pwa this cycle. It won’t be easy, but now is the time.
All we are disagreeing on is how big the "zone" is. If we are in the zone (which I believe we are) the lack of progress at the table indicates release sooner rather than later. The decision is entirely up to the NLRB but a few sessions with no progress forces the decision to release or park. And I have no problem with either.
notEnuf is online now  
Old 10-05-2022, 03:02 PM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,316
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Again you tack to company arguments. The pay increase goes to affordability and a precedent for timely raises Delta is willing to grant for flight crews without concession. Flight crew pay is very different and this distinction for preflight changes the historic norm. Go ahead and exclude all but company arguments, your position is well known.
The more you read his stuff the more ridiculous it comes. I still have a hard time believing it is a real Delta pilot. Has he taken one pro-labor argument? I can't remember one.
Nantonaku is offline  
Old 10-05-2022, 04:29 PM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,558
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I sure hope the negotiators are smart enough to not compare us to the flight attendants. Company to mediator; “We are more than happy to match the flight attendant raises and will even call the boarding pay 16% however we want to align the pilots sick leave, work rules and retirement with the flight attendants!”
That’s not the same thing at all. They had those work rules prior to their raises. They then got their raises without a reduction in other rules.
Iceberg is offline  
Old 10-05-2022, 04:47 PM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,646
Default

Originally Posted by Iceberg
That’s not the same thing at all. They had those work rules prior to their raises. They then got their raises without a reduction in other rules.
They lost the same retirement plan we had pre bankruptcy as well as sick leave and never got close to getting what we have post bankruptcy. Comparing us to flight attendants is simply not smart and would come back to haunt us. Our flight attendants are very efficient and over all costs relative to their peers are much lower than our costs. Why do you think the company fights unionization so much?
sailingfun is online now  
Old 10-05-2022, 04:56 PM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,558
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
They lost the same retirement plan we had pre bankruptcy as well as sick leave and never got close to getting what we have post bankruptcy. Comparing us to flight attendants is simply not smart and would come back to haunt us. The weird part is the ask I see on the forum is now dramatically less than our ask back in 2019 so it looks like we are more or less capitulating.
The weird part is that the company could give a cumulative 22+% raise to other employee groups without reducing other benefits yet we are being asked for concessions and you don’t see that as a factor in the reasonableness of our ask.
Iceberg is offline  
Old 10-06-2022, 04:07 AM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 907
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
All we are disagreeing on is how big the "zone" is. If we are in the zone (which I believe we are) the lack of progress at the table indicates release sooner rather than later. The decision is entirely up to the NLRB but a few sessions with no progress forces the decision to release or park. And I have no problem with either.
Fair enough, that was my point all along, that there are contextual factors which play into the decision by the nmb (which I assume you meant vs nlrb) to release.

Frankly nobody on here knows exactly where the zone is. I trust our MEC and negotiators to have a grasp of that information and make the appropriate strategic decisions based on the polling data to get us an appropriate deal at the appropriate time.
bugman61 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
newKnow
Delta
266
11-06-2016 03:41 PM
FL370esq
Delta
51
09-25-2016 08:55 AM
thndr8
Aviation Law
2
02-16-2015 03:52 PM
FlyLEAN
Part 91 and Low Time
0
01-13-2012 12:01 PM
Thunder1
United
17
11-29-2011 03:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices