Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
A350-1000 and other Fleet News >

A350-1000 and other Fleet News

Search

Notices

A350-1000 and other Fleet News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-2023, 05:37 AM
  #511  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by PilotBases
If we do a 1-1 order, that’s 45 jets at top pay replacing 763s at super NB pay, would be interesting to see where WB A falls when all said and done.
5 digits at some point.
gloopy is offline  
Old 04-16-2023, 05:52 AM
  #512  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
If I remember correctly, you have posted many, many times about how JB is going to eat our lunch everywhere. I almost wonder if you have an above-average obsession with them? I don't think our mgmt is ignoring them. While I still think RA was a better CEO than EB, Ed is a "good" CEO and could even be "great" if he stopped being so infatuated with himself and social/political issues. I remember when SWA announced service to ATL. "They are going to take over the world!" some said. They are a good competitor in ATL, but they haven't eaten our lunch there. We responded appropriately and are still doing quite nicely thank you. If all your JB predictions were true, we'd have left BOS long ago. We're still doing well there, last I checked. It isn't always either-or. JB can have a good business model, AND we can still thrive, and occasionally kick the sh!t out of them when needed. Our mgmt is actually pretty good at that.
Its not that JB will "eat our lunch" overall. We compete well against them, however it took almost 20 years to win back BOS after Leo built the billion dollar Taj Mullin and then gifted them an entire terminal. Even before that brilliant move, they were already growing as fast as aircraft deliveries allowed while DL was parking planes as fast as they could MD pilots.

Also I always knew SWA buying AirTran was an awesome thing for DL. AT was a ruthless and irrational competitor. They did a lot of damage to DL's yields, but fortunatly for us their AC choice limited how severe they could strike us. Even when they got "transcon" planes, they still messed up by getting the baby 73-7's. Those two plane choices helped mitigate the damage they could do but they still did a lot. When SWA bought them, that put them quickly on the path to have baby 737's that paid more than our 777 and 747 CA and FO rates. SWA is a tough competitor, but they're very rational and sustainability is more important to them than simply being in yield trashing endless growth mode.

SWA buying AT was one of the absolute best things that could have happened to DL. It was only rivaled by Alaska CEO's arrogance when RA tried to hand them the west coast on a platinum platter full of Louis XIII and they flipped it onto his suit and said "NO DEAL SUCKA!" as they thought they had forever ownership and could be the left coast feeder for the entire industry on their terms. That bold blunder on their part forced RA's hand and he went at them hard.

Premium lay flat Trans Atlantic is a lot different than NYC-FLL super saver tickets or transcon/Caribbean red eyes. Their margins may not be as amazing as ours given the equipment they elected to use (for now) but dumping evermore lay flat TA seats at a fraction of our yields is something the bean counters will barely notice...until the day they really notice it, and by then it could be too late. History is full of "gradually, then suddenly" financial blunders. Not crushing them now while we can do it by barely making a dent in otherwsie eye watering numbers will one day come back to haunt us.
gloopy is offline  
Old 04-16-2023, 06:06 AM
  #513  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NuGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,902
Default

Originally Posted by JustNarced
Early 2007 hires by next year.
Doubtful. There are still 98-2001 fNWAs that can't hold WB A, and there are a lot of them.
NuGuy is offline  
Old 04-16-2023, 08:16 AM
  #514  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunfighter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,613
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy
Doubtful. There are still 98-2001 fNWAs that can't hold WB Top Pay Rate A, and there are a lot of them.
On the current trajectory today's low 5xxx will hold Top Pay Rate A next year. That covers 98-2001 fNWA.

* NYC 765 A was awarded to a July 98 fNWA hire back in Jan. 39xx

Last edited by Gunfighter; 04-16-2023 at 08:39 AM.
Gunfighter is online now  
Old 04-16-2023, 08:31 AM
  #515  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter
On the current trajectory today's low 5xxx will hold Top Pay Rate A next year. That covers 98-2001 fNWA.

* NYC 765 A was awarded to a July 98 fNWA hire back in Jan. 39xx
And the next ones up are 2007-08-10 and once that small group (1000ish total) has their chance it goes instantly to 2014+
gloopy is offline  
Old 04-16-2023, 06:18 PM
  #516  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 631
Default

How many senior NB A are gonna take a paycut to fly junior WB A. GS on NB fleet are flowing; will they trade for better QOL?
LandGreen2 is offline  
Old 04-16-2023, 07:51 PM
  #517  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2021
Posts: 51
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
The dynamics of it? Yes. Kicking back in Corinthian leather chairs swirling thousand dollar Scotch in a snifter and lighting Ghurka Royal Courtesan's with $100 bills is fun until the money runs out and you wish you had those Billions in burnback money back and are not faced with overlapping fields of fire from redundantly irrational critical mass competitors and suddenly have to shrink to profitability again.

The so called "pilot shortage" is somewhat saving them from themselves, but its sugar high in limiting competitors growth rates will only last so long. When the next "lost decade" happens we will have to deal with uber junior ULCC's who now seat dump millions of lay flat premium seats below our costs. We can deal with them now on our terms by peeling off some profits, or we can deal with them later on their terms by surrendering marketshare to salvage yields in a crumbling revenue environment.

IMO all such attempts now should be met with crushing resistance before the cancer spreads. But that requires long term thinking and B-schools don't focus on that anymore.
Totally agree with the concept of never underestimating the competition. I just don’t see B6 gaining enough slots to make their transatlantic franchise much of a threat in terms of market share. It’s a competitive product but very limited frequency and overall capacity. Happy to see DAL respond by adding the LGW flights.
Hawk1G is offline  
Old 04-17-2023, 08:59 AM
  #518  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by Hawk1G
Happy to see DAL respond by adding the LGW flights.
Agreed. I've always thought the hype of LHR was hillariously overblown. "But its on the tUbE!" LOL please. The Gatwick Express is +/- 5 minutes the same to downtown.
gloopy is offline  
Old 04-17-2023, 09:01 AM
  #519  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SurferLucas's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Taking up space
Posts: 262
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Agreed. I've always thought the hype of LHR was hillariously overblown. "But its on the tUbE!" LOL please. The Gatwick Express is +/- 5 minutes the same to downtown.
I was more shocked to see the layover location for LGW,
SurferLucas is offline  
Old 04-17-2023, 09:11 AM
  #520  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by SurferLucas
I was more shocked to see the layover location for LGW,
Haven't seen that. Then again we don't layover in some once great overnight cities in the US anymore either. Oh well.
gloopy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices