Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
A350-1000 and other Fleet News >

A350-1000 and other Fleet News

Search

Notices

A350-1000 and other Fleet News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-05-2024, 03:54 PM
  #2571  
looking for underboob
 
bohicagain's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: NYC 7ER LCA
Posts: 902
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
It matters to me! I non rev often to STT. I should say used to non rev. American no longer has 757's for the market. There are no extra gates available. As a result American has gone from 195seats to under 130 for their STT flights. Even the A320 won't work. They are mostly 319's to PHL, JFK, CLT and a 737-800 to MIA. The only upside is I have bought so many tickets that I am platinum.
When Delta pulls the 757's even more seats will be lost and fares will increase.
This!!!
Flew to STT yesterday. Left full out of ATL and right up to 38,000 feet. Landing distance available 6592. No problem for the 75! It's amazing machine and hope it stays for years to come. I'm sure bean counters take into consideration the fuel price when selling seats on a 757.

How many here drive a gas guzzler getting less than 20 mpg vs a prius? Same concept. Cheaper to pay more for gas for a paid off airplane then to save gas money by buying new airplanes.

Maybe because I was on the 717 but I was tired of doing CLT and MCI turns. Prefer destinations and trips on the ER
bohicagain is offline  
Old 03-05-2024, 04:04 PM
  #2572  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Position: MD-88 FO
Posts: 1,571
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
Interesting, since a Delta 350 has never once landed in JFK other than a divert. Are you talking a pilot base?
Well, yeah, if they wanna fly to India and not transit Russian airspace…a350 in jfk.
Myfingershurt is offline  
Old 03-05-2024, 05:02 PM
  #2573  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Position: 737 A
Posts: 1,031
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
but this thing MAKES GAS at .81!!!!


-ER pilots who somehow know more than performance engineers
or they just believe the engineers/programers that programmed the FMS and noticed that .80/.81 had more EFOA than .77/.78/.79/.82 ….
Vsop is offline  
Old 03-05-2024, 05:15 PM
  #2574  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 891
Default

Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo
Maybe, maybe 2028?

Here's something else to chew on. 350 in JFK. Heard it here first.
very very spicy rumor. The exact kind of spicy rumor I come to APC to read.
Extenda is offline  
Old 03-05-2024, 05:35 PM
  #2575  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: LAX ER
Posts: 1,606
Default

Originally Posted by CX500T
Bid pack quality and variety on the 757. As a junior-ish racoon picking through the trash of bid packs, the bottom ER trips are better than midpack 320 trips. At least NYC.

The only 0500 report has a 26 hour Honolulu layover.
very few double Uncommutable.
idk man. A **** load of 757 flying in Atlanta is not better than 320/737 mid pack trips. Thankfully I’m senior on this fleet to avoid that ****show.
tcco94 is offline  
Old 03-05-2024, 05:36 PM
  #2576  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: LAX ER
Posts: 1,606
Default

Originally Posted by Extenda
very very spicy rumor. The exact kind of spicy rumor I come to APC to read.
350 base in airport the 350 has 0 routes from.

also 350SLC.

heard it here first.
tcco94 is offline  
Old 03-05-2024, 05:46 PM
  #2577  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: LAX ER
Posts: 1,606
Default

I love how every 3-6 months we have a multi-page argument about the 757. Never fails. I fly the thing and I could care less about most of these topics. I like the international and island trips and pay (even though it’s about the same as 320 now). Comfort of 320 looks nice and probably what I will upgrade on later this year.

The only thing I’ll look back on with 75/76 is the fun ass trips I got to do. A lot of diversity and interesting mixes…international/sports charters/domestic/island etc. Very well may never be a fleet diversity like this ever again in our careers.

But I won’t brag about the performance. I really don’t care. Yes I can look back to one hand on how many weight restricted issues I have had. Almost never. But in reality is that a huge deal to me? No not really. Most people don’t care. Whatever trips/seniority/base is like 90%+ of why people bid. Only goobers are out there placing bids to fly a specific fleet type to say they did.
tcco94 is offline  
Old 03-05-2024, 06:08 PM
  #2578  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,637
Default

Originally Posted by tcco94
350 base in airport the 350 has 0 routes from YET.

also 350SLC.

heard it here first.
FIFY.

We currently have 28 350s in service with 36 more on order. I don’t think it’s unreasonable at all to suspect we will eventually fly our largest and longest range WB out of our second largest hub.
Gone Flying is online now  
Old 03-05-2024, 06:24 PM
  #2579  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Viper25's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 710
Default

Originally Posted by tcco94
I love how every 3-6 months we have a multi-page argument about the 757. Never fails. I fly the thing and I could care less about most of these topics. I like the international and island trips and pay (even though it’s about the same as 320 now). Comfort of 320 looks nice and probably what I will upgrade on later this year.

The only thing I’ll look back on with 75/76 is the fun ass trips I got to do. A lot of diversity and interesting mixes…international/sports charters/domestic/island etc. Very well may never be a fleet diversity like this ever again in our careers.

But I won’t brag about the performance. I really don’t care. Yes I can look back to one hand on how many weight restricted issues I have had. Almost never. But in reality is that a huge deal to me? No not really. Most people don’t care. Whatever trips/seniority/base is like 90%+ of why people bid. Only goobers are out there placing bids to fly a specific fleet type to say they did.
Exactly. No need to debate this thing so often. The performance is good for the company but the “seat of the pants” is the same across all the airliners I’ve flown, especially being on AP 99% of the time. Trips/seniority/base/pay are the reasons to bid.
Viper25 is offline  
Old 03-05-2024, 06:29 PM
  #2580  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2023
Posts: 1,520
Default

Originally Posted by tcco94
I love how every 3-6 months we have a multi-page argument about the 757. Never fails. I fly the thing and I could care less about most of these topics. I like the international and island trips and pay (even though it’s about the same as 320 now). Comfort of 320 looks nice and probably what I will upgrade on later this year.

The only thing I’ll look back on with 75/76 is the fun ass trips I got to do. A lot of diversity and interesting mixes…international/sports charters/domestic/island etc. Very well may never be a fleet diversity like this ever again in our careers.

But I won’t brag about the performance. I really don’t care. Yes I can look back to one hand on how many weight restricted issues I have had. Almost never. But in reality is that a huge deal to me? No not really. Most people don’t care. Whatever trips/seniority/base is like 90%+ of why people bid. Only goobers are out there placing bids to fly a specific fleet type to say they did.
I was in the fleet for almost 2 decades.

Flown most of our underperforming yet efficient other planes to include the big buses. Nothing, nothing ( other than the 777-200LR and maybe the 350-1000) comes remotely close to the capability of the 757. Nothing.
Hotel Kilo is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices