A350-1000 and other Fleet News
#2191
Agreed. Thats why I asked why Scoop referred to it in such a way. The Airbus is definitely a mental machine; perhaps more so than Boeing. But once you have a good working knowledge of it, its pretty simple and practical to operate in my opinion. But YMMV...
#2192
I believe he's referring to the performance hit with the greater than 20kt crosswind or any tailwind procedure.
#2193
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,595
#2195
I’ve flown Boeing, Airbus and McD. I find the FMS on the Airbus perfectly acceptable. The Boeing box is marginally better in only a handful of ways. The McD box on the 717 is pretty close to an Airbus box. The only things I really miss about the Boeing are the VSD and managed descent in heading mode.But Boeing can keep those for the comfort and size of the Airbus cockpit. “So Much Room for Activities!”
#2196
#2197
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Position: MD-88 FO
Posts: 1,571
the 350 box is almost exactly the same as the 320 box. It may be presented a little different but its functionality is 95% the same. The 350 box just fixes a lot of the software shortcomings in the 320 but has a few things missing that the 320 had that worked well. Like being able to change your speed or CI when it the descent phase.
#2198
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,595
#2200
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,371
Every time I JS in a Boeing, I ended up scratching my head.
If the FMS is wayyy better than the Airbus, the amount of time I see VS and people moving the throttles doesn’t make sense. It’s like Stockholm syndrome… lol
“But but but the Airbus doesn’t start down by itself.”
If the FMS is wayyy better than the Airbus, the amount of time I see VS and people moving the throttles doesn’t make sense. It’s like Stockholm syndrome… lol
“But but but the Airbus doesn’t start down by itself.”