Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
A350-1000 and other Fleet News >

A350-1000 and other Fleet News

Search

Notices

A350-1000 and other Fleet News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-2023, 07:03 AM
  #1611  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,456
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
I think this is called quibbling and quite frankly, is beneath you.
You are entitled to your opinion. When it comes to pilot cost numbers, pay, benefits and profit sharing I prefer facts.
notEnuf is offline  
Old 12-03-2023, 07:10 AM
  #1612  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 670
Default

This whole conversation of 787 vs 330/350 is nothing but mental masturbation. You all sound like a bunch of Riddle dorks. Who is your audience here? Management? Each other? Trying to win the internet and be the Smartest Man In The Room?

Pilots don't buy airplanes. Management doesn't care what pilots think and don't ask what we want to fly here (though I've heard ALPA and UAL have had those discussions). Delta management buys the cheapest jets they can find and makes them work. We're also the most profitable legacy, so they must be doing something right.

I say fly whatever they tell you to fly and let management make the financial decisions. What is it with pilots who think they could run an airline? That's never worked out.
Nick Bradshaw is offline  
Old 12-03-2023, 07:13 AM
  #1613  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,237
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
You are entitled to your opinion. When it comes to pilot cost numbers, pay, benefits and profit sharing I prefer facts.
Facts would be nice, but in lieu of spending considerable effort to try to extract the minutia, most people take a rough cut and see what the ballpark #'s are . Unless the exact number is published and broken out, are we to assume there are no pilot costs?

It's all you brother....you can argue with yourself from here on out on this one.

Peace Out
Buck Rogers is offline  
Old 12-03-2023, 07:15 AM
  #1614  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,237
Default

Originally Posted by Nick Bradshaw
This whole conversation of 787 vs 330/350 is nothing but mental masturbation. You all sound like a bunch of Riddle dorks. Who is your audience here? Management? Each other? Trying to win the internet and be the Smartest Man In The Room?

Pilots don't buy airplanes. Management doesn't care what pilots think and don't ask what we want to fly here (though I've heard ALPA and UAL have had those discussions). Delta management buys the cheapest jets they can find and makes them work. We're also the most profitable legacy, so they must be doing something right.

I say fly whatever they tell you to fly and let management make the financial decisions. What is it with pilots who think they could run an airline? That's never worked out.

Nick, you take a lot of grief on APC.

But ..............you nailed this one.
Buck Rogers is offline  
Old 12-03-2023, 07:17 AM
  #1615  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2023
Posts: 1,520
Default

Originally Posted by Nick Bradshaw
This whole conversation of 787 vs 330/350 is nothing but mental masturbation. You all sound like a bunch of Riddle dorks. Who is your audience here? Management? Each other? Trying to win the internet and be the Smartest Man In The Room?

Pilots don't buy airplanes. Management doesn't care what pilots think and don't ask what we want to fly here (though I've heard ALPA and UAL have had those discussions). Delta management buys the cheapest jets they can find and makes them work. We're also the most profitable legacy, so they must be doing something right.

I say fly whatever they tell you to fly and let management make the financial decisions. What is it with pilots who think they could run an airline? That's never worked out.
So what? I know they all pay the same. But our competition is moving to the 787s. It is a nicer experience for the pax. Go fly over to Asia on a 787. You'll feel totally different about it when you do - trust me. That experience can not be denied, you feel much better physically due to the capabilitites of the aircraft. So if we're charging premium for substandard, sooner or later that word gets out there. Especially the vloggers and travel bloggers. Like it or not, that is where the previous 2 generations are getting there info from. They will be the largest consumer cohort going forward for the next 40 years. How much longer will DAL be able to charge revenue premium when we leave people behind? IDK the answer to that. However it is clear what direction our competition is moving. As Sailing stated, the 330 is a washed up 40 year old design.
Hotel Kilo is offline  
Old 12-03-2023, 07:28 AM
  #1616  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tinpusher007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 330 B
Posts: 1,622
Default

Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo
Go look at UAL. They have seasonal out of ORD. WHy did you assume it was just AA??


Eithad? Really? Whatever, we are talking about a330 flying from US to Asia. The 787-9 is not payload optimized going or coming - that according to Captains from UAL and AAL that fly the routes year round. the A330 is and it's done often.
Im not assuming anything about AA, they don't fly to Asia from ORD. Period. That has more to do with their weak position there vs UA than a lack of suitable aircraft. You said your buddies at AA fly 78's from ORD. I'm saying they don't. I'm also agreeing with you that the 787-9, in particular is superior to the A339. BUT talking about UA who does fly 787s from ORD and just about everywhere else on some very long flights; compared to our A339, the 787 already has a higher MTOW by about 20k lbs AND as I said they carry 24 less pax and therefore 24 less pax bags. That's not at all insignificant. So it stands to reason that they never have payload issues on those routes. But I bet if you ask them about SFO-SIN or JNB/CPT-EWR they likely do have to sometimes leave pax or cargo. I don't know why me mentioning Etihad is "whatever" to you; as if that pilot's experience is somehow invalid. The point is the 787 is just like any other plane; if pushed to its limits it will take performance hits just like any other. It just so happens that the A339 takes those hits more often because it's capabilities are less than a 787; that we can agree on.

Last edited by Tinpusher007; 12-03-2023 at 07:38 AM.
Tinpusher007 is offline  
Old 12-03-2023, 07:36 AM
  #1617  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tinpusher007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 330 B
Posts: 1,622
Default

Originally Posted by Nick Bradshaw
This whole conversation of 787 vs 330/350 is nothing but mental masturbation. You all sound like a bunch of Riddle dorks. Who is your audience here? Management? Each other? Trying to win the internet and be the Smartest Man In The Room?

Pilots don't buy airplanes. Management doesn't care what pilots think and don't ask what we want to fly here (though I've heard ALPA and UAL have had those discussions). Delta management buys the cheapest jets they can find and makes them work. We're also the most profitable legacy, so they must be doing something right.

I say fly whatever they tell you to fly and let management make the financial decisions. What is it with pilots who think they could run an airline? That's never worked out.
It's a discussion...about airplane performance...on an airline pilot forum. Riddle dorks. Yes I am; class of '01. Who would have guessed, right? If this topic is so beneath you why comment? They buy them with their primary concern being money because that's what execs do. We operate them with our concern being their performance because that's what pilots do. Heaven forbid we talk about it on an Internet forum designed specifically for that purpose.
Tinpusher007 is offline  
Old 12-03-2023, 07:57 AM
  #1618  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,237
Default

Originally Posted by Tinpusher007
They buy them with their primary concern being money because that's what execs do. We operate them with our concern being their performance Money and QOL, because that's what pilots do.

FIFY...........

BTW....as has been shown, published performance numbers are meaningless. Best performing plane at Delta is/was the 757
Buck Rogers is offline  
Old 12-03-2023, 07:58 AM
  #1619  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2020
Position: 330B
Posts: 130
Default

Originally Posted by Nick Bradshaw
This whole conversation of 787 vs 330/350 is nothing but mental masturbation. You all sound like a bunch of Riddle dorks. Who is your audience here? Management? Each other? Trying to win the internet and be the Smartest Man In The Room?

Pilots don't buy airplanes. Management doesn't care what pilots think and don't ask what we want to fly here (though I've heard ALPA and UAL have had those discussions). Delta management buys the cheapest jets they can find and makes them work. We're also the most profitable legacy, so they must be doing something right.

I say fly whatever they tell you to fly and let management make the financial decisions. What is it with pilots who think they could run an airline? That's never worked out.
Lighten up Francis.

No one here expects this discussion will have any impact on what Delta does with aircraft purchases. The audience is other pilots. We like to talk about airplanes.
Rinaldi is offline  
Old 12-03-2023, 09:08 AM
  #1620  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tinpusher007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 330 B
Posts: 1,622
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
Best performing plane at Delta is/was the 757
So, you DO have an opinion on aircraft performance...odd.
Tinpusher007 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices