Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2 >

Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Yesterday, 08:35 PM
  #6701  
Gets Weekends Off
 
20Fathoms's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,068
Default

Originally Posted by 170Till5
I would rather be able to reference the PWA to a scheduler since it has the most weight than the SRH. But again, it shouldn’t take a whole other 100+ page document to understand our contract 😂. That’s my opinion though and I know I’m not alone in that. I would rather reference the book than rely on cliff notes for my homework assignment / exam

Giving 10+ examples to explain reroute pay really means they did a poor job explaining how reroute pay works in their lawyer speak
What’s really annoying is when the cliff notes makes up random stuff that isn’t even in the book. So to be sure of any issue you need to read the book and then check the cliff notes to make sure it isn’t overruled there.
20Fathoms is online now  
Old Yesterday, 08:58 PM
  #6702  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,017
Default

Originally Posted by 170Till5
… since it has the most weight than the SRH.
False. Please don’t spread this misinformation.
TED74 is offline  
Old Today, 04:52 AM
  #6703  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Posts: 704
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
Just for those who may not be aware, the SRH is 100% binding on the company, as are the Scheduling Alerts & Negotiators Notepads. If you get a scheduler saying they don’t have to abide by them, calmly ask for a supervisor. And follow up with an FCR to ensure accountability for that scheduler.

While it’s always best to quote the PWA, these other documents are vetted through the company before publication and are absolutely just as binding.
that’s good to know. I did not realize it was legally binding for the company to follow what it says, just as much as the PWA
170Till5 is offline  
Old Today, 07:28 AM
  #6704  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 615
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
Just for those who may not be aware, the SRH is 100% binding on the company, as are the Scheduling Alerts & Negotiators Notepads. If you get a scheduler saying they don’t have to abide by them, calmly ask for a supervisor. And follow up with an FCR to ensure accountability for that scheduler.

While it’s always best to quote the PWA, these other documents are vetted through the company before publication and are absolutely just as binding.
As well as notify the Scheduling Committee when it occurs.

And on that same note, if you see incomplete or incorrect items in the SRH, please submit an STS Inquiry to the Scheduling Committee to bring it to their attention. Working through a pretty major overhaul of the SRH and want to include as much stuff as we possibly can to improve the document.
Ar Pilot is offline  
Old Today, 09:56 AM
  #6705  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,571
Default

Originally Posted by texas1970
The contract is not supposed to explain how reroute pay works. The contract is supposed to simply state it. And it does, in 23 L4

The examples are a bonus to make things easier, and my guess is they were specifically crafted during negotiations to make sure both sides had a good idea of what they were agreeing to. Of course, there were some unforeseen situations, which is why we just had an MOU about it.

Its hard to predict every reroute scenario that might come up.

I really don’t think people understand what a “simple” contract would leave us with. What parts would you eliminate? And every single thing we “reword” would now be up to a new interpretation by the company and an arbitrator.
This can not be overstated. Every changed or new word in the contract creates a break from precedent and shows intent to rework meaning. You basically tell the arbitrator that what we had was not desired and a new understanding is now enacted. That severes any arguement about precedent and opens the new language to interpretation of the understanding.
notEnuf is offline  
Old Today, 11:31 AM
  #6706  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Posts: 704
Default

Originally Posted by 20Fathoms
What’s really annoying is when the cliff notes makes up random stuff that isn’t even in the book. So to be sure of any issue you need to read the book and then check the cliff notes to make sure it isn’t overruled there.
I saw that for daylight savings time this past weekend the company was assigning people 0900 SC on day 1 on reserve. Since that’s technically 10 hours of rest from midnight. They’re right but petty IMO playing games with the pilot group to get them to sit reserve 1 hour earlier. So we need to reword the contract now to state 1000 on the first day of reserve as the earliest and at least10 hours of rest
170Till5 is offline  
Old Today, 11:39 AM
  #6707  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,779
Default

Originally Posted by 170Till5
I saw that for daylight savings time this past weekend the company was assigning people 0900 SC on day 1 on reserve. Since that’s technically 10 hours of rest from midnight. They’re right but petty IMO playing games with the pilot group to get them to sit reserve 1 hour earlier. So we need to reword the contract now to state 1000 on the first day of reserve as the earliest and at least10 hours of rest
We get it back on “spring forward”
Planetrain is offline  
Old Today, 12:10 PM
  #6708  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,304
Default

Originally Posted by Planetrain
We get it back on “spring forward”
Did they assign 10am SC this past spring? If so, that should be a grievance.
m3113n1a1 is offline  
Old Today, 12:42 PM
  #6709  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2021
Posts: 243
Default

Originally Posted by 170Till5
I saw that for daylight savings time this past weekend the company was assigning people 0900 SC on day 1 on reserve. Since that’s technically 10 hours of rest from midnight. They’re right but petty IMO playing games with the pilot group to get them to sit reserve 1 hour earlier. So we need to reword the contract now to state 1000 on the first day of reserve as the earliest and at least10 hours of rest
The wording doesn't say anything about 10AM. It also doesn't say anything about the trip/SC being on the pilots schedule by noon on an X day. It's at least 10 hours after start of LC, placed on schedule at least 12 hours before start of LC. This is of particular importance when coming off non-fly days that don't end at midnight (i.e. PB/PR.)

The wording doesn't need to change for the niche case of daylight saving. And I don't really see it as the company playing games, it's actually pretty black/white. But daylight saving does have a tendancy to throw people off.

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
Did they assign 10am SC this past spring? If so, that should be a grievance.
Indeed.
Verdell is offline  
Old Today, 01:37 PM
  #6710  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2022
Posts: 112
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
Did they assign 10am SC this past spring? If so, that should be a grievance.
and an ASAP
CruJones is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boog123
Delta
6
07-14-2016 12:26 PM
iahflyr
Major
27
09-30-2014 10:04 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 07:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 10:14 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 05:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices