Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2 >

Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-17-2022, 04:38 AM
  #661  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,636
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
When switching aircraft I think we now do systems at home prior to day 1. I tried to log onto the systems course via LMS and it says "Not for Credit." Do I have to wait to be assigned the curriculum first? The new manuals were all pushed to my IPAD so I thought I could just start.

Thanks Scoop
there is a smart sheet to fill out to request LMS learning ( I think it under your specific fleet, training section)

They got me my courses the next day
Gone Flying is offline  
Old 06-17-2022, 06:40 AM
  #662  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,595
Default

Originally Posted by airplanes
I keep hearing about people hired in 2021 already making captain in Nyc but looking at widget seniority that should be taking quite a bit longer. Is the estimate in WS a bit pessimistic? Does NB A really take 10 years at ATL? I would assume it would come slightly faster if the hiring continues and the economy doesn’t implode.
The standard gouge for a good airline career was always 12 years to make CA, 18 years for Widebody CA and 20 Years for Widebody international. 10 years at our most senior base is actually pretty good but off the top of my head it’s less than that on the last few bids.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 06-17-2022, 07:48 AM
  #663  
It's 5 o'clock somewhere
 
Margaritaville's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2020
Posts: 2,154
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The standard gouge for a good airline career was always 12 years to make CA, 18 years for Widebody CA and 20 Years for Widebody international. 10 years at our most senior base is actually pretty good but off the top of my head it’s less than that on the last few bids.
I have no idea what you're replying to because I have no reason to read this thread but this comment jumped out at me and I want to point out what an anachronism you are. I get you're an old fart and your career is behind you and you think you have a lot to offer us "kids" (I'm in my 50s) but 100% of your thoughts are rooted in the airline industry of the 80s and 90s. Listening to you talk is like watching back to the future in the 50s. Your own company has CAs with less than 3 years with the company even on the 717 in ATL and I hear my buddies say all the time that 330 CA is going to come down to 10 years soon. Pretty sure 767 is already less than that. Yet here you sit and tell us about the industry of the 80s. Shut up. Stop trying to lower everyone expectations. Quit being a management toadie and go fishing.
Margaritaville is offline  
Old 06-17-2022, 08:07 AM
  #664  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,595
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
I have no idea what you're replying to because I have no reason to read this thread but this comment jumped out at me and I want to point out what an anachronism you are. I get you're an old fart and your career is behind you and you think you have a lot to offer us "kids" (I'm in my 50s) but 100% of your thoughts are rooted in the airline industry of the 80s and 90s. Listening to you talk is like watching back to the future in the 50s. Your own company has CAs with less than 3 years with the company even on the 717 in ATL and I hear my buddies say all the time that 330 CA is going to come down to 10 years soon. Pretty sure 767 is already less than that. Yet here you sit and tell us about the industry of the 80s. Shut up. Stop trying to lower everyone expectations. Quit being a management toadie and go fishing.
Man I bet you are a joy to be around!
sailingfun is offline  
Old 06-17-2022, 08:14 AM
  #665  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hawaii50's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 757 Left
Posts: 1,308
Default

Hey Sailing, you've posted a ton of good stuff here over the years. Ignore the haters. Especially the ones that work somewhere else.
Hawaii50 is offline  
Old 06-17-2022, 10:18 AM
  #666  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Petting Zoo
Posts: 2,090
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
I have no idea what you're replying to because I have no reason to read this thread but this comment jumped out at me and I want to point out what an anachronism you are. I get you're an old fart and your career is behind you and you think you have a lot to offer us "kids" (I'm in my 50s) but 100% of your thoughts are rooted in the airline industry of the 80s and 90s.....
Disagree.

Don't always agree but always appreciate the insights and the manner in which he presents them.
Sputnik is offline  
Old 06-17-2022, 10:24 AM
  #667  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,303
Default

Originally Posted by Sputnik
Disagree.

Don't always agree but always appreciate the insights and the manner in which he presents them.
Definitely appreciate his posts. I question his motives and think he is wrong about 75% of the time but I still value the posts and read them and take them seriously.
Nantonaku is offline  
Old 06-17-2022, 12:37 PM
  #668  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,636
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The standard gouge for a good airline career was always 12 years to make CA, 18 years for Widebody CA and 20 Years for Widebody international. 10 years at our most senior base is actually pretty good but off the top of my head it’s less than that on the last few bids.
So I will need some help here because I obviously was not around for the past 30+ years, but with the exception of 2000-2001 hires, couldn’t most pilots at DL hold CA by the 12 year mark? Airlinefiles.com has a jr CA snapshot going all the way back to 2005 and it is usually under 10 years (again excluding those hired from 2000-2001, which by any objective standard probably had the worst career trajectory and seniority progression of any pilots at DL hired after deregulation)

historically speaking, hasn’t jr CA typically been around 60-65% systemwide seniority? I wonder what keeps causing it to drop to pilots with 90% company seniority recently?

18 years to WB CA is probably not going to happen for most at DL. Im projected to be in the seniority range of WB CA plug around the 25 year mark and would be thrilled if that ends up happening.

for someone hired today it will take closer to 27-28 years to hit that number.
Gone Flying is offline  
Old 06-17-2022, 01:27 PM
  #669  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,370
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
So I will need some help here because I obviously was not around for the past 30+ years, but with the exception of 2000-2001 hires, couldn’t most pilots at DL hold CA by the 12 year mark? Airlinefiles.com has a jr CA snapshot going all the way back to 2005 and it is usually under 10 years (again excluding those hired from 2000-2001, which by any objective standard probably had the worst career trajectory and seniority progression of any pilots at DL hired after deregulation)

historically speaking, hasn’t jr CA typically been around 60-65% systemwide seniority? I wonder what keeps causing it to drop to pilots with 90% company seniority recently?

18 years to WB CA is probably not going to happen for most at DL. Im projected to be in the seniority range of WB CA plug around the 25 year mark and would be thrilled if that ends up happening.

for someone hired today it will take closer to 27-28 years to hit that number.
By your numbers it's obvious you are in the "767 isn't a widebody unless it has -400 at the end" crowd, but the 767s are slated to replaced by 330s, which will add a significant number of seats.
Baradium is offline  
Old 06-17-2022, 01:32 PM
  #670  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,636
Default

Originally Posted by Baradium
By your numbers it's obvious you are in the "767 isn't a widebody unless it has -400 at the end" crowd, but the 767s are slated to replaced by 330s, which will add a significant number of seats.
i was thinking WB pay but yeah I tend to exclude the ER from WB calculations because

1) it’s going away and
2) it pays pretty close to a 737

I think you are right that the total number of WB paying positions will increase as we add 330s and 350s

i was using 2500-3000 as what is needed to hold a WB reliably we will see how that number changes as our fleet changes
Gone Flying is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boog123
Delta
6
07-14-2016 11:26 AM
iahflyr
Major
27
09-30-2014 09:04 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices