Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2 >

Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-25-2024, 04:00 PM
  #6111  
Moderator
 
FangsF15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,812
Default

Originally Posted by CRJphlyer
I don’t want it to go to memrat. I don’t support a IROP LOA but I elect representatives for a reason. I do not support letting the memrat cat out of the bag for every little thing that happens.
LOA’s are very few and far between. They are anything but a “little thing”.

Every LOA should go to MEMRAT with very,very few exceptions (there should be a high bar to override for obvious/lopsided wins - don’t we already have a Policy Manual provision for this?). As already stated, I don’t know anyone who thinks the Batch Size giveaway would have passed MEMRAT. It’s a problem when reps are that out of step with their constituency.
FangsF15 is offline  
Old 08-25-2024, 04:17 PM
  #6112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,518
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
Lol. “Send in DARTs about the IROP” is entirely different from “We are engaging in talks with management to provide contractual relief related to IROP recovery. Please contact us with your thoughts and suggestions.”
It's amazing to me that he thinks a DART about the IROP is a pass to negotiate an LOA.. I bet most darts were explicitly about how the contract was violated. Are they going to negotiate the company back into compliance again?
CBreezy is offline  
Old 08-25-2024, 04:30 PM
  #6113  
Bent over by buybacks
 
StoneQOLdCrazy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 776
Default

Originally Posted by CRJphlyer
I believe they have. They asked for pilots to send in DARTs about the IROP.
You cannot be serious. Asking for anecdotes from the IROP has nothing at all to do with seeking input for a potentially PWA-altering LOA.

zero polling, zero input sought. This is how we got TA1.

Moak is pleased.

edit: agree with Ancman and CBreezy. How can a guy be this naive?
StoneQOLdCrazy is offline  
Old 08-25-2024, 04:36 PM
  #6114  
Bent over by buybacks
 
StoneQOLdCrazy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 776
Default

Originally Posted by CRJphlyer
I don’t want it to go to memrat. I don’t support a IROP LOA but I elect representatives for a reason. I do not support letting the memrat cat out of the bag for every little thing that happens.
Bro, you clearly have ZERO perspective on how hard it was for us to wrest control from the MEC on matters like this. It was a hard-earned achievement that you appear to be absolutely clueless about.

Are you getting talking points from DH or DA?

I sure hope you are not in a position of influence within DALPA or have any kind of pilot-facing role there.

Last edited by StoneQOLdCrazy; 08-25-2024 at 04:46 PM.
StoneQOLdCrazy is offline  
Old 08-25-2024, 05:41 PM
  #6115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,238
Default

An LOA to give the company relief during IROPs?? That would be absolutely insane and industry leading in the wrong direction.
​​​​​​
m3113n1a1 is offline  
Old 08-25-2024, 08:28 PM
  #6116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
20Fathoms's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,014
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
An LOA to give the company relief during IROPs?? That would be absolutely insane and industry leading in the wrong direction.
​​​​​​
Agreed. I’ll never understand the pull of some of our reps to ingratiate themselves to management. Like it’s the cool kids club and they’re special now, so sure whatever you guys want. It was on full display during TA1. I had an FO rep tell me verbatim that they’d had “a peek behind the curtain” and that they were the best positioned to make decisions for us because of that inside knowledge.

MEMRAT is a powerful antidote to that BS line of thinking.
20Fathoms is offline  
Old 08-26-2024, 02:40 AM
  #6117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Posts: 930
Default

Originally Posted by 20Fathoms
Agreed. I’ll never understand the pull of some of our reps to ingratiate themselves to management. Like it’s the cool kids club and they’re special now, so sure whatever you guys want. It was on full display during TA1. I had an FO rep tell me verbatim that they’d had “a peek behind the curtain” and that they were the best positioned to make decisions for us because of that inside knowledge.

MEMRAT is a powerful antidote to that BS line of thinking.
Definitely. That is why I’m against letting MEC members have full autonomy to make PWA-altering decisions.

When the curtain is peeled back to reveal their “insider” line of thinking, it is often clear how naive and/or management-influenced their decision process was. A perfect example was AB’s 3rd grade level dissertation on why the batch size giveaway was a good deal. Both his naivety and susceptibility to management were on full display.

Any action that will alter any word in the PWA, whether an LOA or MEC-driven grievance settlement, should go to MEMRAT as the final step. The notion that the MEC understands what pilots want better than the pilots themselves is absurd.
ancman is offline  
Old 08-26-2024, 03:00 AM
  #6118  
seeing the large hubs...
 
iaflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 73N A
Posts: 3,747
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
if they come back with something that is good for the pilot group and it passes memrat (like LOA 20-04) I don’t see an issue. My problem becomes when a rouge MEC decides to give away a piece of our contract for nothing in a move that (by my best guess) would have failed memrat spectacularly.
Exactly. You all remember the "oh lets give the company some relief and give them stand-up overnights at a cheaper price." ?

For those who weren't here, in 2015 there was an agreement during FAR 117 negotiations to allow more Stand-up overnights with few limits, and at a cheaper price (basically, 7 hours or so vs 10.5 we had before). It was slipped in the LOA without telling anyone and it got leaked. We didn't have Memrat for LOA, so we would of been stuck with it had the MEC approved it. A last minute huge onslaught of negative comments removed them at the last minute.

Regardinging giving the company some relief during IROPS - lets start with paying people correctly, then we'll talk about IROPS relief. Maybe tie IROPS relief to Crew360 being implemented for pay?
iaflyer is offline  
Old 08-26-2024, 04:19 AM
  #6119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,016
Default

All LOA’s should go to memrat. Voting is online anyway. I still wouldn’t even know these talks are going on except for this website. Something’s suspicious. What relief does company need? Reroute pay relief? Seriously? I have no idea.
hockeypilot44 is offline  
Old 08-26-2024, 04:30 AM
  #6120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 180
Default

Glad to see the ChitChatters have found a 2nd home here.

Look, I don’t support an IROP LOA. The company didn’t follow the PWA during the last IROP, why would they follow an LOA?

I also don’t want everything going to memrat. I trust my reps to make sound, informed decisions.
CRJphlyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boog123
Delta
6
07-14-2016 11:26 AM
iahflyr
Major
27
09-30-2014 09:04 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices